WFC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LVDS | WFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 19 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 60% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LVDS and WFC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVDS and WFC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVDS | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| WFC - LVDS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| BAC - LVDS | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| AMZN - LVDS | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
| RTX - LVDS | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.12% | ||
| MSFT - LVDS | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.