Ad is loading...
LW
Price
$76.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
41 days until earnings call
PLAG
Price
$3.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

LW vs PLAG

Header iconLW vs PLAG Comparison
Open Charts LW vs PLAGBanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$76.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.27M
CapitalizationN/A
Planet Green Holdings
Price$3.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$154.12K
CapitalizationN/A
LW vs PLAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LW vs. PLAG commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a StrongBuy and PLAG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (LW: $76.75)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.55% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.06% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than PLAG($18.8M). LW YTD gains are higher at: -27.658 vs. PLAG (-32.938). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. PLAG (-22.52M). PLAG has less debt than LW: PLAG (3.76M) vs LW (3.63B). LW has higher revenues than PLAG: LW (6.35B) vs PLAG (24.3M).
LWPLAGLW / PLAG
Capitalization15.4B18.8M81,915%
EBITDA1.34B-22.52M-5,967%
Gain YTD-27.658-32.93884%
P/E Ratio13.62N/A-
Revenue6.35B24.3M26,115%
Total CashN/A314K-
Total Debt3.63B3.76M96,517%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs PLAG: Fundamental Ratings
LW
PLAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
733
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
2697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3847

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (48) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PLAG (56). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to PLAG’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PLAG (100). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to PLAG’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (26) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLAG (97). This means that LW’s stock grew significantly faster than PLAG’s over the last 12 months.

PLAG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (55). This means that PLAG’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLAG (100). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SABR3.670.07
+1.94%
Sabre Corp
COFS36.500.67
+1.87%
ChoiceOne Financial Services
ERIE425.035.58
+1.33%
Erie Indemnity Company
IRT21.480.13
+0.61%
Independence Realty Trust
CGTX0.44N/A
-0.05%
Cognition Therapeutics

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+0.84%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
POST - LW
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.56%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
USNA - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
More

PLAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLAG and RMCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLAG and RMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLAG
1D Price
Change %
PLAG100%
+2.82%
RMCF - PLAG
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
NOMD - PLAG
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
KHC - PLAG
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
LW - PLAG
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
FAMI - PLAG
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
More