LZ
Price
$6.92
Change
+$0.36 (+5.50%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.19B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ULS
Price
$96.99
Change
-$0.68 (-0.70%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
19.55B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LZ vs ULS

LZ vs ULS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LZ vs. ULS commentary
Jul 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZ is a Buy and ULS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2026
Stock price -- (LZ: $6.07 vs. ULS: $96.99)
Brand notoriety: LZ and ULS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LZ: 121% vs. ULS: 101%
Market capitalization -- LZ: $1.19B vs. ULS: $19.55B
LZ [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $1.19B. ULS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $19.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ULS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the long-term than LZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ULS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the short-term than LZ.

Price Growth

LZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +5.93% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

ULS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+1.85% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ULS($19.5B) has a higher market cap than LZ($1.19B). LZ has higher P/E ratio than ULS: LZ (91.08) vs ULS (52.16). ULS YTD gains are higher at: 23.383 vs. LZ (-38.872). ULS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 732M vs. LZ (75.9M). ULS has more cash in the bank: 258M vs. LZ (183M). LZ has less debt than ULS: LZ (15.2M) vs ULS (539M). ULS has higher revenues than LZ: ULS (3.11B) vs LZ (780M).
LZULSLZ / ULS
Capitalization1.19B19.5B6%
EBITDA75.9M732M10%
Gain YTD-38.87223.383-166%
P/E Ratio91.0852.16175%
Revenue780M3.11B25%
Total Cash183M258M71%
Total Debt15.2M539M3%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZULS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ULS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRMD7.85N/A
N/A
CorMedix
ENGN1.75N/A
N/A
enGene Therapeutics Inc
DFSC2.15N/A
N/A
Defsec Technologies Inc
SN151.47-0.37
-0.24%
SharkNinja
TTAM18.21-0.19
-1.03%
Titan America SA

ULS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ULS and ARMK have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ULS and ARMK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULS
1D Price
Change %
ULS100%
-0.70%
ARMK - ULS
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
TRI - ULS
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBZ - ULS
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
AZZ - ULS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
LZ - ULS
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More