MAG
Price
$13.83
Change
-$0.04 (-0.29%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
95 days until earnings call
NEM
Price
$38.28
Change
+$1.26 (+3.40%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
61 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MAG vs NEM

Header iconMAG vs NEM Comparison
Open Charts MAG vs NEMBanner chart's image
MAG Silver
Price$13.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
Volume$1.06M
CapitalizationN/A
Newmont
Price$38.28
Change+$1.26 (+3.40%)
Volume$23.93M
CapitalizationN/A
MAG vs NEM Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAG vs. NEM commentary
Dec 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAG is a Hold and NEM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 21, 2024
Stock price -- (MAG: $13.83 vs. NEM: $38.28)
Brand notoriety: MAG: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAG: 152% vs. NEM: 199%
Market capitalization -- MAG: $1.12B vs. NEM: $42B
MAG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.12B. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than MAG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the short-term than MAG.

Price Growth

MAG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.43% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAG is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

NEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.40% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($42B) has a higher market cap than MAG($1.12B). NEM has higher P/E ratio than MAG: NEM (36.25) vs MAG (22.98). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 32.853 vs. NEM (-5.207). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 320M vs. MAG (-13.89M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 3.03B vs. MAG (68.7M). MAG has less debt than NEM: MAG (154K) vs NEM (9.44B). NEM has higher revenues than MAG: NEM (11.8B) vs MAG (0).
MAGNEMMAG / NEM
Capitalization1.12B42B3%
EBITDA-13.89M320M-4%
Gain YTD32.853-5.207-631%
P/E Ratio22.9836.2563%
Revenue011.8B-
Total Cash68.7M3.03B2%
Total Debt154K9.44B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAG vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings
MAG
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5255
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7284
SMR RATING
1..100
5690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8825
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEM's Valuation (12) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAG (93). This means that NEM’s stock grew significantly faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (84). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (56) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEM (90). This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (64). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAG (88). This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAGNEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGOWX58.460.62
+1.07%
Voya Large-Cap Growth W
JDPRX15.510.14
+0.91%
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value R
RPFCX62.410.55
+0.89%
Davis Balanced Fund A
EMAAX14.99N/A
N/A
Gabelli Entpr Mergers & Acquisitions A
IGIFX35.94-0.32
-0.89%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc F1