MAT
Price
$13.29
Change
+$0.15 (+1.14%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.8B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRKS
Price
$33.25
Change
+$0.58 (+1.78%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.51B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAT vs PRKS

MAT vs PRKS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MAT vs. PRKS commentary
Sep 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MAT is a Buy and PRKS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MAT vs PRKS: Fundamental Ratings
MAT
PRKS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4638
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7265
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5043
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5038

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRKS's Valuation (59) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as MAT (79) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PRKS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

PRKS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as MAT (100) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PRKS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

PRKS's SMR Rating (38) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as MAT (46) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PRKS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

PRKS's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as MAT (72) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PRKS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

PRKS's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as MAT (50) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PRKS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MATPRKS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2026
Stock price -- (MAT: $13.29 vs. PRKS: $33.25)
Brand notoriety: MAT and PRKS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAT: 137% vs. PRKS: 71%
Market capitalization -- MAT: $3.8B vs. PRKS: $1.51B
MAT [@Recreational Products] is valued at $3.8B. PRKS’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $1.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $932 to $30.64B. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $2.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PRKS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRKS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRKS is a better buy in the long-term than MAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRKS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PRKS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRKS is a better buy in the short-term than MAT.

Price Growth

MAT (@Recreational Products) experienced а +0.23% price change this week, while PRKS (@Recreational Products) price change was -2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

PRKS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+1.19% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

View a ticker or compare two or three
MAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRKS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLDR59.170.89
+1.53%
Builders FirstSource
APH84.091.01
+1.22%
Amphenol Corporation
FATE2.350.02
+0.86%
Fate Therapeutics
PAVM3.900.02
+0.64%
PAVmed Inc
POET7.770.02
+0.26%
POET Technologies

MAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been loosely correlated with JAKK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then JAKK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAT
1D Price
Change %
MAT100%
+1.14%
JAKK - MAT
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.93%
ONEW - MAT
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
FNKO - MAT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
HAS - MAT
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
PRKS - MAT
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
More

PRKS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRKS has been loosely correlated with FUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRKS jumps, then FUN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRKS
1D Price
Change %
PRKS100%
+1.78%
FUN - PRKS
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
GOLF - PRKS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
CLAR - PRKS
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
AS - PRKS
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.74%
PTON - PRKS
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
More