MCHB
Price
$15.31
Change
+$0.42 (+2.82%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.39B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFNC
Price
$22.48
Change
+$0.31 (+1.40%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.26B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHB vs SFNC

MCHB vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHB vs. SFNC commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHB is a Buy and SFNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (MCHB: $15.31 vs. SFNC: $22.48)
Brand notoriety: MCHB and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHB: 107% vs. SFNC: 107%
Market capitalization -- MCHB: $3.39B vs. SFNC: $3.26B
MCHB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.39B. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHB is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHB is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

MCHB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.34% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCHB is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHB($3.39B) and SFNC($3.26B) have the same market capitalization . SFNC has higher P/E ratio than MCHB: SFNC (13.73) vs MCHB (0.03). SFNC YTD gains are higher at: 20.167 vs. MCHB (12.835). MCHB has less debt than SFNC: MCHB (211M) vs SFNC (762M). MCHB has higher revenues than SFNC: MCHB (720M) vs SFNC (126M).
MCHBSFNCMCHB / SFNC
Capitalization3.39B3.26B104%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.83520.16764%
P/E Ratio0.0313.730%
Revenue720M126M571%
Total CashN/A343M-
Total Debt211M762M28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHB vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
MCHB
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1041
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3571
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10084
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4020

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHB's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFNC (90) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MCHB’s stock grew significantly faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SFNC (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MCHB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MCHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MCHB (61) in the null industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MCHB (100) in the null industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHBSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIBD5.390.24
+4.58%
Direxion Daily AI And Big Data Bear 2X
BSCS20.330.02
+0.07%
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corp Bd ETF
QVMM35.60N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF
ZJAN27.93-0.05
-0.16%
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January
FCEF23.59-0.06
-0.25%
First Trust Income Opportunity ETF

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
+1.28%
UCB - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
UBSI - SFNC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
FNB - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
AUB - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
CATY - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
More