Advertisement
CATY vs MCHB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATY is a Hold and MCHB is a Hold.
| CATY | MCHB | CATY / MCHB | |
| Capitalization | 4.14B | 3.41B | 121% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.739 | 15.063 | 204% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.14 | 11.83 | 103% |
| Revenue | 871M | 771M | 113% |
| Total Cash | 136M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 154M | 289M | 53% |
CATY | MCHB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 39 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MCHB's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CATY (66) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CATY’s over the last 12 months.
CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHB (100) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.
CATY's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCHB (14) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.
CATY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCHB (49) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to MCHB’s over the last 12 months.
CATY's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHB (76) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.
| CATY | MCHB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 32% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 28% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 19% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 65% | 10 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 32% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 15% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CATY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MCHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CATY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MCHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CATY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CATY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MCHB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.08% price change this week, while MCHB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
CATY is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
MCHB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TXNU | 40.95 | 2.84 | +7.45% |
| Direxion Daily TXN Bull 2X ETF | |||
| TSLT | 13.52 | 0.13 | +0.97% |
| T-REX 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | |||
| RSST | 34.76 | 0.31 | +0.90% |
| Return Stacked® US Stocks & Mgd Futs ETF | |||
| AUGU | 32.09 | 0.21 | +0.67% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncAugETF | |||
| EMLP | 43.79 | -0.16 | -0.36% |
| First Trust North Amer Engy InfrasETF | |||
CATY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATY has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CATY jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CATY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATY | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| UCB - CATY | 89% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| UBSI - CATY | 89% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| AUB - CATY | 87% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| FULT - CATY | 87% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ONB - CATY | 87% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||
MCHB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHB has been loosely correlated with CATY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHB jumps, then CATY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHB | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| CATY - MCHB | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| TRMK - MCHB | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| EFSC - MCHB | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| UBSI - MCHB | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| FFBC - MCHB | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||