Comparing MCO (Moody's Corporation) and SNEX (StoneX Group Inc.) may seem unconventional at first glance — one is a century-old credit rating agency turned data-and-analytics powerhouse, the other a global financial services network connecting clients to markets across commodities, currencies, and securities. Yet both occupy critical positions in the modern financial ecosystem and attract fundamentally different investor profiles. Moody's appeals to those seeking durable, recurring revenue streams and high margins, while StoneX attracts investors drawn to earnings acceleration, cyclical leverage, and acquisition-driven compounding. This stock comparison examines how these two names stack up across business models, recent performance, and market positioning.
Moody's Corporation operates through two primary segments: Moody's Investors Service (MIS), which issues credit ratings on debt instruments, and Moody's Analytics (MA), which provides financial data, research, and risk-management software. In its most recent full fiscal year, MCO generated record revenue of $7.7 billion — a 9% increase — and expanded its adjusted operating margin to 51.1%. Adjusted diluted EPS (earnings per share) rose 20% to $14.94.
The company has been methodically integrating AI (artificial intelligence) capabilities into its product suite, embedding decision-grade data directly into customer workflows through APIs (application programming interfaces), agentic solutions, and partnerships with platforms like Salesforce and ServiceNow. Customers who adopt at least one standalone GenAI or agentic product are retaining at a 97% rate and growing at roughly double the pace of the broader client base. In recent weeks, MCO shares have pulled back from the $510–$523 range to approximately $471, reflecting broader market caution around valuation and macroeconomic uncertainty — including tariff-related concerns and shifting interest rate expectations. Over the past year, the stock has declined roughly 7%, underperforming the broader market. The company's 2026 guidance projects adjusted EPS in the range of $16.40 to $17.00, implying continued double-digit earnings growth.
StoneX Group is a global financial services network that provides execution, clearing, risk management, advisory, and post-trade solutions across commodities, currencies, securities, and digital assets. The company operates through four segments — Commercial, Institutional, Self-Directed/Retail, and Payments — serving a diversified client base from multinational corporations to retail traders. StoneX has completed over 30 acquisitions in the past decade, with the transformative purchase of R.J. O'Brien (RJO), the oldest futures brokerage in the U.S., closing in mid-2025.
The RJO integration has fundamentally reshaped StoneX's financial profile. In its fiscal second quarter of 2026 (ending March 31, 2026), the company reported record net operating revenues of $829.1 million, up 70% year-over-year, and net income of $174.3 million — a 143% surge. Quarterly ROE (return on equity) reached 26.5%, while ROE on tangible book value hit 37.0%. Listed derivatives volumes approached 100 million contracts, and average client equity plus sweep balances reached $15.2 billion. In recent weeks, SNEX shares have undergone a 3-for-2 stock split and consolidated in the $70–$84 range after a rally that drove the stock up more than 75% year-to-date. Elevated geopolitical tensions and commodity-market volatility have continued to support trading volumes across the company's product lines.
For investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating opportunities across thousands of tickers, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that execute across diverse trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — from swing trading and trend following to pattern recognition and breakout strategies. Each bot trades a unique set of tickers and maintains its own performance track record, with many bots generating double-digit annualized returns in favorable market conditions. Rather than overwhelming users with the full library, the Trending AI Robots section surfaces only those bots that are best aligned with current market conditions — making it easier for traders to identify strategies with demonstrated recent effectiveness. To explore which AI trading strategies are currently trending, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Business Model: Moody's generates roughly half its revenue from credit ratings — a franchise protected by high barriers to entry, regulatory designations, and decades of market trust — and the other half from subscription-based analytics with 97% recurring revenue. StoneX earns revenue primarily through transaction-based fees, trading spreads, commissions, and net interest income on client balances, making its top line inherently more sensitive to market activity levels and volatility.
Growth Drivers: MCO's growth is increasingly tied to AI adoption, private credit markets, infrastructure and energy-transition financing, and digital finance innovations such as its recently proposed stablecoin rating methodology. SNEX's growth is powered by acquisitions, cross-selling an expanding product suite into newly acquired client bases, and secular trends such as the digitization of derivatives markets and rising demand for hedging services.
Margins and Profitability: Moody's boasts some of the widest margins in financial services — an adjusted operating margin above 51% — reflecting the asset-light, royalty-like economics of ratings and data licensing. StoneX operates with structurally thinner margins given the high-volume, transaction-intensive nature of its business; however, operating leverage from recent acquisitions is driving margin expansion, with tangible ROE reaching 37% in the most recent quarter.
Recent Momentum and Sentiment: SNEX has strongly outperformed MCO over the trailing twelve months, with the former up roughly 76% compared to a roughly 7% decline for Moody's. However, SNEX's rally reflects an element of cyclical tailwind from elevated market volatility — particularly in commodities amid geopolitical disruptions — which may not persist indefinitely. Moody's, by contrast, has faced valuation compression as investors rotate away from higher-multiple names in an uncertain rate environment.
Risk Factors: Moody's faces sensitivity to debt issuance volumes — a slowdown in corporate or government bond issuance could pressure MIS revenue — along with regulatory risks tied to its role in credit markets. StoneX faces credit risk from client defaults in volatile markets, integration risk from its aggressive M&A (mergers and acquisitions) strategy, and earnings sensitivity to interest rate changes, with a 100-basis-point shift in short-term rates currently estimated to impact EPS by over $1.00 annually.
Based on observable trend consistency, stability of earnings drivers, and relative positioning in the current market environment, Tickeron's AI would likely view Moody's (MCO) as the more probabilistically favorable candidate for trend-following strategies at this juncture — despite its weaker year-to-date price performance. The reasoning centers on the durability and predictability of MCO's revenue base: 97% recurring revenue in the Analytics segment, a 93% retention rate, and AI-driven product adoption that compounds customer stickiness. While StoneX (SNEX) is delivering dramatically higher earnings growth, much of that acceleration is tied to market volatility and recent M&A — variables that are inherently less stable and harder to model forward. That said, for shorter-horizon momentum strategies, SNEX's powerful earnings surprises and volume-driven operating leverage present a compelling case. The final preference depends on the AI bot's specific strategy and timeframe, but on a probability-weighted basis, Moody's combination of visibility, margin structure, and secular AI tailwinds offers the more consistent signal.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNEX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNEX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +1.46% price change this week, while SNEX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.20%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.94%.
MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
SNEX is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.01% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| MCO | SNEX | MCO / SNEX | |
| Capitalization | 82.8B | 9.26B | 894% |
| EBITDA | 4.36B | 2.53B | 173% |
| Gain YTD | -5.930 | 81.102 | -7% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.35 | 20.52 | 148% |
| Revenue | 8.16B | 152B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 1.5B | 37.4M | 4,000% |
| Total Debt | 7.52B | 21.8B | 35% |
MCO | SNEX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNEX's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (85) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
SNEX's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (57) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's SMR Rating (15) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as SNEX (47) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to SNEX’s over the last 12 months.
SNEX's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (54) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
SNEX's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (83) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
| MCO | SNEX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 59% | 14 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 33% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNEX has been loosely correlated with MRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNEX jumps, then MRX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNEX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNEX | 100% | -1.35% | ||
| MRX - SNEX | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| MCO - SNEX | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| MORN - SNEX | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| RJF - SNEX | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| NDAQ - SNEX | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
More | ||||