MCO
Price
$478.38
Change
-$3.88 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
82.85B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SNEX
Price
$76.57
Change
-$1.05 (-1.35%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
9.26B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCO vs SNEX

MCO vs SNEX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Moody's Corporation (MCO) vs. StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Moody's Corporation (MCO) operates a high-margin credit ratings and analytics franchise with over $7.7 billion in annual revenue and a 51.1% adjusted operating margin.
  • StoneX Group (SNEX) is a diversified financial services network that recently delivered a 143% surge in quarterly net income, fueled by acquisitions and elevated market volatility.
  • MCO's stock has declined roughly 7% year-to-date and trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio near 30, while SNEX has gained over 75% year-to-date and trades at a P/E under 20.
  • Both companies benefit from secular trends but through entirely different mechanisms: Moody's monetizes data and credit expertise through recurring subscriptions, while StoneX profits from transaction volumes, spreads, and net interest on client balances.
  • Recent weeks have shown divergent momentum — MCO shares pulled back from mid-July highs near $523 while SNEX has been navigating post-split consolidation after a dramatic run.
  • AI-driven decision tools and strategic acquisitions are central to each company's growth narrative, but their risk profiles and market sensitivities differ substantially.

Introduction

Comparing MCO (Moody's Corporation) and SNEX (StoneX Group Inc.) may seem unconventional at first glance — one is a century-old credit rating agency turned data-and-analytics powerhouse, the other a global financial services network connecting clients to markets across commodities, currencies, and securities. Yet both occupy critical positions in the modern financial ecosystem and attract fundamentally different investor profiles. Moody's appeals to those seeking durable, recurring revenue streams and high margins, while StoneX attracts investors drawn to earnings acceleration, cyclical leverage, and acquisition-driven compounding. This stock comparison examines how these two names stack up across business models, recent performance, and market positioning.

MCO Overview and Recent Performance

Moody's Corporation operates through two primary segments: Moody's Investors Service (MIS), which issues credit ratings on debt instruments, and Moody's Analytics (MA), which provides financial data, research, and risk-management software. In its most recent full fiscal year, MCO generated record revenue of $7.7 billion — a 9% increase — and expanded its adjusted operating margin to 51.1%. Adjusted diluted EPS (earnings per share) rose 20% to $14.94.

The company has been methodically integrating AI (artificial intelligence) capabilities into its product suite, embedding decision-grade data directly into customer workflows through APIs (application programming interfaces), agentic solutions, and partnerships with platforms like Salesforce and ServiceNow. Customers who adopt at least one standalone GenAI or agentic product are retaining at a 97% rate and growing at roughly double the pace of the broader client base. In recent weeks, MCO shares have pulled back from the $510–$523 range to approximately $471, reflecting broader market caution around valuation and macroeconomic uncertainty — including tariff-related concerns and shifting interest rate expectations. Over the past year, the stock has declined roughly 7%, underperforming the broader market. The company's 2026 guidance projects adjusted EPS in the range of $16.40 to $17.00, implying continued double-digit earnings growth.

SNEX Overview and Recent Performance

StoneX Group is a global financial services network that provides execution, clearing, risk management, advisory, and post-trade solutions across commodities, currencies, securities, and digital assets. The company operates through four segments — Commercial, Institutional, Self-Directed/Retail, and Payments — serving a diversified client base from multinational corporations to retail traders. StoneX has completed over 30 acquisitions in the past decade, with the transformative purchase of R.J. O'Brien (RJO), the oldest futures brokerage in the U.S., closing in mid-2025.

The RJO integration has fundamentally reshaped StoneX's financial profile. In its fiscal second quarter of 2026 (ending March 31, 2026), the company reported record net operating revenues of $829.1 million, up 70% year-over-year, and net income of $174.3 million — a 143% surge. Quarterly ROE (return on equity) reached 26.5%, while ROE on tangible book value hit 37.0%. Listed derivatives volumes approached 100 million contracts, and average client equity plus sweep balances reached $15.2 billion. In recent weeks, SNEX shares have undergone a 3-for-2 stock split and consolidated in the $70–$84 range after a rally that drove the stock up more than 75% year-to-date. Elevated geopolitical tensions and commodity-market volatility have continued to support trading volumes across the company's product lines.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating opportunities across thousands of tickers, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that execute across diverse trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — from swing trading and trend following to pattern recognition and breakout strategies. Each bot trades a unique set of tickers and maintains its own performance track record, with many bots generating double-digit annualized returns in favorable market conditions. Rather than overwhelming users with the full library, the Trending AI Robots section surfaces only those bots that are best aligned with current market conditions — making it easier for traders to identify strategies with demonstrated recent effectiveness. To explore which AI trading strategies are currently trending, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business Model: Moody's generates roughly half its revenue from credit ratings — a franchise protected by high barriers to entry, regulatory designations, and decades of market trust — and the other half from subscription-based analytics with 97% recurring revenue. StoneX earns revenue primarily through transaction-based fees, trading spreads, commissions, and net interest income on client balances, making its top line inherently more sensitive to market activity levels and volatility.

Growth Drivers: MCO's growth is increasingly tied to AI adoption, private credit markets, infrastructure and energy-transition financing, and digital finance innovations such as its recently proposed stablecoin rating methodology. SNEX's growth is powered by acquisitions, cross-selling an expanding product suite into newly acquired client bases, and secular trends such as the digitization of derivatives markets and rising demand for hedging services.

Margins and Profitability: Moody's boasts some of the widest margins in financial services — an adjusted operating margin above 51% — reflecting the asset-light, royalty-like economics of ratings and data licensing. StoneX operates with structurally thinner margins given the high-volume, transaction-intensive nature of its business; however, operating leverage from recent acquisitions is driving margin expansion, with tangible ROE reaching 37% in the most recent quarter.

Recent Momentum and Sentiment: SNEX has strongly outperformed MCO over the trailing twelve months, with the former up roughly 76% compared to a roughly 7% decline for Moody's. However, SNEX's rally reflects an element of cyclical tailwind from elevated market volatility — particularly in commodities amid geopolitical disruptions — which may not persist indefinitely. Moody's, by contrast, has faced valuation compression as investors rotate away from higher-multiple names in an uncertain rate environment.

Risk Factors: Moody's faces sensitivity to debt issuance volumes — a slowdown in corporate or government bond issuance could pressure MIS revenue — along with regulatory risks tied to its role in credit markets. StoneX faces credit risk from client defaults in volatile markets, integration risk from its aggressive M&A (mergers and acquisitions) strategy, and earnings sensitivity to interest rate changes, with a 100-basis-point shift in short-term rates currently estimated to impact EPS by over $1.00 annually.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, stability of earnings drivers, and relative positioning in the current market environment, Tickeron's AI would likely view Moody's (MCO) as the more probabilistically favorable candidate for trend-following strategies at this juncture — despite its weaker year-to-date price performance. The reasoning centers on the durability and predictability of MCO's revenue base: 97% recurring revenue in the Analytics segment, a 93% retention rate, and AI-driven product adoption that compounds customer stickiness. While StoneX (SNEX) is delivering dramatically higher earnings growth, much of that acceleration is tied to market volatility and recent M&A — variables that are inherently less stable and harder to model forward. That said, for shorter-horizon momentum strategies, SNEX's powerful earnings surprises and volume-driven operating leverage present a compelling case. The final preference depends on the AI bot's specific strategy and timeframe, but on a probability-weighted basis, Moody's combination of visibility, margin structure, and secular AI tailwinds offers the more consistent signal.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MCO vs. SNEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCO is a StrongBuy and SNEX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MCO: $478.38 vs. SNEX: $76.57)
Brand notoriety: MCO and SNEX are both not notable
MCO represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while SNEX is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCO: 83% vs. SNEX: 40%
Market capitalization -- MCO: $82.85B vs. SNEX: $9.26B
MCO [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $82.85B. SNEX’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $9.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $121.44B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $38.91B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNEX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNEX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNEX is a better buy in the long-term than MCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNEX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SNEX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the short-term than SNEX.

Price Growth

MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +1.46% price change this week, while SNEX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.20%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

SNEX is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.21% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.01% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCO($82.8B) has a higher market cap than SNEX($9.26B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than SNEX: MCO (30.35) vs SNEX (20.52). SNEX YTD gains are higher at: 81.102 vs. MCO (-5.930). MCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.36B vs. SNEX (2.53B). MCO has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. SNEX (37.4M). MCO has less debt than SNEX: MCO (7.52B) vs SNEX (21.8B). SNEX has higher revenues than MCO: SNEX (152B) vs MCO (8.16B).
MCOSNEXMCO / SNEX
Capitalization82.8B9.26B894%
EBITDA4.36B2.53B173%
Gain YTD-5.93081.102-7%
P/E Ratio30.3520.52148%
Revenue8.16B152B5%
Total Cash1.5B37.4M4,000%
Total Debt7.52B21.8B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCO vs SNEX: Fundamental Ratings
MCO
SNEX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6372
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5737
SMR RATING
1..100
1547
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8328
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNEX's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (85) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

SNEX's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (57) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's SMR Rating (15) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as SNEX (47) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to SNEX’s over the last 12 months.

SNEX's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (54) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

SNEX's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (83) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCOSNEX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SNEX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAND39.140.31
+0.80%
Bandwidth
FLG14.22-0.03
-0.21%
Flagstar Bank National Association
GSK51.69-0.38
-0.73%
GSK plc
CURV2.55-0.06
-2.30%
Torrid Holdings
FUSE0.78-0.03
-3.54%
Fusemachines Inc.

SNEX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNEX has been loosely correlated with MRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNEX jumps, then MRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNEX
1D Price
Change %
SNEX100%
-1.35%
MRX - SNEX
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
MCO - SNEX
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
MORN - SNEX
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
RJF - SNEX
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
NDAQ - SNEX
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
More