MRX
Price
$64.92
Change
-$1.00 (-1.52%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.67B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SNEX
Price
$76.57
Change
-$1.05 (-1.35%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
9.26B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRX vs SNEX

MRX vs SNEX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Marex Group (MRX) vs. StoneX Group (SNEX) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Marex Group and StoneX Group are both diversified global financial services platforms connecting clients to commodities, energy, and financial markets, but they differ meaningfully in scale, revenue mix, and growth trajectory.
  • Marex (MRX) has posted 11 consecutive years of profit growth, driven by expansion in Prime Services and disciplined M&A (mergers and acquisitions) execution, with a leaner, higher-margin profile.
  • StoneX (SNEX) operates at far greater total revenue scale — over $130 billion in FY2025 — reflecting a massive physical commodities business alongside its institutional, retail, and payments segments.
  • Both stocks have delivered exceptional year-to-date returns exceeding 70%, substantially outperforming the broader market, though each has experienced a moderation in price momentum in recent weeks.
  • StoneX carries a larger market capitalization and higher P/E (price-to-earnings) multiple, while Marex trades at a more compressed valuation with a lower P/E ratio, offering a different risk-reward profile.
  • Recent M&A activity has been a central theme for both companies, with StoneX closing transformative acquisitions and Marex steadily expanding its geographic footprint and capabilities.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the global financial infrastructure space — the plumbing that connects traders, producers, and institutions to commodity and financial markets — often encounter two compelling yet distinct names: MRX (Marex Group plc) and SNEX (StoneX Group Inc.). Both companies operate diversified platforms spanning clearing, execution, market-making, and client services across multiple asset classes and geographies. Yet their business models, growth strategies, and valuation profiles diverge in important ways. This stock comparison examines how each company has performed in the current market environment, what forces are shaping sentiment, and how AI-driven analytical tools might assess the relative positioning of these two financial services peers.

MRX Overview and Recent Performance

Marex Group plc is a diversified global financial services platform headquartered in London with shares listed on the Nasdaq. The company provides essential liquidity, market access, and infrastructure services to clients across energy, commodities, and financial markets through four core service lines: Clearing, Agency and Execution, Market Making, and Hedging and Investment Solutions. With access to 60 exchanges and a presence in more than 40 offices worldwide, Marex serves a broad client base that includes commodity producers, banks, hedge funds, and asset managers.

In recent months, Marex has sustained a strong growth trajectory. The company reported record fourth-quarter results for its 2025 fiscal year, with revenue climbing 38% year-over-year to $572.1 million and adjusted profit before tax rising 41% to $114.9 million. Full-year FY2025 adjusted profit before tax reached $418.1 million, marking the company's eleventh consecutive year of profit growth. This performance has been powered by standout expansion in Prime Services and Agency and Execution, alongside steady growth in Clearing client balances, which averaged $13.3 billion in the third quarter. Marex has also pursued an active M&A strategy, adding Winterflood Securities (UK equities market-making) and Valcourt (Swiss fixed income) to its platform, while S&P Global Ratings affirmed its BBB- investment-grade credit rating with a stable outlook. The stock has delivered a year-to-date return of approximately 72%, though it has pulled back modestly from its recent highs near $71 in early July, settling around the mid-$60s, reflecting some near-term consolidation after a powerful rally.

SNEX Overview and Recent Performance

StoneX Group Inc. is a Fortune 50 global financial services network headquartered in New York, connecting companies, organizations, traders, and investors to the global market ecosystem. The company operates across four segments — Commercial, Institutional, Self-Directed/Retail, and Payments — serving more than 54,000 institutional, commercial, and payments clients and over 260,000 self-directed/retail accounts from more than 80 offices spanning six continents. Its services include execution, clearing, custody, risk management, and advisory across equities, fixed income, currencies, commodities, and digital assets.

StoneX closed its fiscal year 2025 with record results, posting annual net income of $305.9 million (up 17% year-over-year) on total revenues exceeding $130 billion. The fourth fiscal quarter alone generated record quarterly net income of $85.7 million, with net operating revenues surging 29% to $585.1 million, aided by strong contributions in equities trading, prime brokerage, and fixed income. The period was transformational on the M&A front: StoneX completed the acquisition of R.J. O'Brien, the oldest futures brokerage in the U.S. and the largest independent non-bank FCM (Futures Commission Merchant), as well as The Benchmark Company, adding investment banking, equity research, and institutional sales capabilities. It also acquired Intercam's U.S.-based brokerage operations to deepen its Latin American wealth management presence. The stock has surged roughly 76% year-to-date, though it has experienced a notable pullback of approximately 18% over the past month from its mid-June all-time high, as the market digests post-acquisition integration dynamics and broader sector rotation.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where speed, pattern recognition, and discipline increasingly determine outcomes, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers traders a curated window into the platform's most compelling AI-driven trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively scan thousands of tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn placement in this featured section. The bots span a wide spectrum of trading styles — from trend-following and swing trading to breakout and mean-reversion strategies — operating across timeframes as short as 5 minutes and as long as 60 minutes. Performance metrics vary significantly by strategy, with top-performing bots in recent periods posting annualized returns ranging from approximately 50% to well over 200%, depending on the sector focus, risk parameters, and volatility regime. Win rates among leading bots have ranged from roughly 57% to over 67%, with profit factors occasionally exceeding 4.0 in highly favorable conditions. Every bot comes with full transparency into closed trades, open positions, equity curves, and key statistics such as Sharpe ratio and maximum drawdown. For traders looking to explore which AI strategies are resonating with the current market, the Trending AI Robots page provides a regularly updated, data-rich starting point.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both MRX and SNEX operate in the same broad financial infrastructure arena, several structural differences define their risk and return profiles.

Business Model and Revenue Scale: StoneX generates enormous total revenues — over $130 billion in FY2025 — because a large portion flows through its physical commodities segment, where it acts as principal in buying, transporting, storing, and selling physical goods. This produces thin margins on massive volumes. Marex, by contrast, operates a more fee- and commission-oriented model with FY2025 revenues of approximately $2.0 billion, yielding higher adjusted profit before tax margins (around 20.7%) than StoneX's net operating revenue model. The difference reflects two paths to scale: StoneX pursues breadth and volume, while Marex emphasizes higher-margin intermediation.

Growth Drivers: Both companies are deploying M&A aggressively, but with different flavors. StoneX's acquisitions of R.J. O'Brien and The Benchmark Company are transformative, significantly expanding its U.S. futures clearing footprint and adding investment banking capabilities. Marex's deals, such as Winterflood and Valcourt, are more measured, adding specific capabilities and client relationships in targeted geographies or asset classes.

Valuation: At recent levels, Marex trades at approximately 14.9 times trailing earnings, while StoneX commands a P/E of roughly 19.9. StoneX's premium likely reflects its larger market capitalization (~$8.8 billion versus ~$4.7 billion), longer public track record, and the perceived value of its newly acquired investment banking and expanded futures capabilities. Marex's lower multiple may reflect its shorter public history and the market's ongoing assessment of earnings sustainability.

Risk Factors: StoneX faces integration risk from its large-scale acquisitions and carries higher financial leverage, with a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 1.27. Marex navigated a short-seller report in 2025, which S&P reviewed and dismissed as unlikely to have a material impact. Both are sensitive to commodity market volatility and exchange volumes, though Marex's more diversified service mix has shown resilience when exchange volumes decline.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings momentum, margin profile, and relative valuation, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a nuanced preference between these two stocks depending on the strategy employed. Marex's higher and expanding profit margins, 11-year streak of profit growth, and more compressed valuation multiple could make it appear more attractive to trend-following and value-oriented AI models, particularly given the stock's steady climb with relatively orderly pullbacks. StoneX's larger market presence, transformational M&A catalysts, and longer-established public market history might appeal more to momentum and growth-oriented strategies, though the sharp one-month correction introduces greater near-term uncertainty in trend signals. On balance, for models prioritizing margin quality, earnings consistency, and valuation discipline, Marex would likely register as the more probabilistically favorable candidate in the current environment, while StoneX would remain a high-potential but higher-volatility alternative whose AI-driven appeal may strengthen once post-acquisition integration metrics begin to materialize more clearly.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MRX vs. SNEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRX is a Buy and SNEX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MRX: $64.92 vs. SNEX: $76.57)
Brand notoriety: MRX and SNEX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRX: 55% vs. SNEX: 40%
Market capitalization -- MRX: $4.67B vs. SNEX: $9.26B
MRX [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.67B. SNEX’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $9.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNEX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MRX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNEX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MRX and SNEX are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNEX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SNEX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNEX is a better buy in the short-term than MRX.

Price Growth

MRX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while SNEX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRX is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

SNEX is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.01% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNEX($9.26B) has a higher market cap than MRX($4.67B). SNEX has higher P/E ratio than MRX: SNEX (20.52) vs MRX (14.73). SNEX YTD gains are higher at: 81.102 vs. MRX (70.452). SNEX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.53B vs. MRX (1.33B). MRX has more cash in the bank: 6.89B vs. SNEX (37.4M). MRX has less debt than SNEX: MRX (10.4B) vs SNEX (21.8B). SNEX has higher revenues than MRX: SNEX (152B) vs MRX (4.1B).
MRXSNEXMRX / SNEX
Capitalization4.67B9.26B50%
EBITDA1.33B2.53B53%
Gain YTD70.45281.10287%
P/E Ratio14.7320.5272%
Revenue4.1B152B3%
Total Cash6.89B37.4M18,428%
Total Debt10.4B21.8B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNEX: Fundamental Ratings
SNEX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRXSNEX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SNEX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOH195.620.92
+0.47%
Molina Healthcare
PGACU10.77N/A
N/A
Pantages Capital Acquisition Corporation
VHC13.00-0.15
-1.14%
VirnetX Holding Corp
AVAH9.39-0.30
-3.10%
Aveanna Healthcare Holdings
EDIT2.58-0.11
-4.09%
Editas Medicine

MRX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRX has been loosely correlated with SNEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRX jumps, then SNEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRX
1D Price
Change %
MRX100%
-1.52%
SNEX - MRX
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
VIRT - MRX
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
SF - MRX
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
EVR - MRX
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
BGC - MRX
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
More

SNEX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNEX has been loosely correlated with MRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNEX jumps, then MRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNEX
1D Price
Change %
SNEX100%
-1.35%
MRX - SNEX
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
MCO - SNEX
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
MORN - SNEX
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
RJF - SNEX
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
NDAQ - SNEX
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
More