Investors navigating the financial services sector often encounter two very different types of companies: capital markets infrastructure providers and diversified financial services networks. NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.) and SNEX (StoneX Group Inc.) represent these two distinct approaches. Nasdaq has evolved from a stock exchange operator into a global technology platform powering the financial ecosystem, while StoneX has built a broad network connecting clients to markets through execution, clearing, and risk management services. This stock comparison examines how these two companies measure up in the current market environment, considering their relative performance, business models, growth trajectories, and the kind of investor each might appeal to.
Nasdaq, Inc. has completed a remarkable transformation over the past decade, evolving from a traditional exchange operator into a diversified financial technology and data platform. In 2025, the company crossed the $5 billion annual net revenue threshold for the first time, reporting $5.2 billion in total net revenue — a 13% increase year-over-year. The Solutions business, which now represents approximately 76% of total revenue, delivered $4.0 billion in annual revenue, underscoring the company's deliberate shift toward higher-margin, recurring revenue streams.
Nasdaq's Annualized Recurring Revenue (ARR) reached $3.1 billion by year-end 2025, growing 10% year-over-year, with SaaS revenue representing 38% of ARR. The Index franchise set new records with $882 billion in year-end AUM (Assets Under Management) and $99 billion in net inflows. The Financial Technology division, bolstered by the Adenza acquisition, delivered 14% ARR growth in Q4 2025. Nasdaq maintained its position as the leading U.S. listing exchange by proceeds raised for the seventh consecutive year and captured a historic $1.2 trillion in listing transfers, headlined by Walmart's move to the exchange.
In recent weeks, NDAQ shares have traded in the $90–$95 range, reflecting measured consolidation after earlier reaching a 52-week high of $101.79. The company's non-GAAP diluted EPS of $3.48 for full-year 2025 represented 24% growth, and its Q4 2025 EPS of $0.96 beat analyst estimates. Credit rating upgrades from both Moody's (to Baa1) and S&P (to BBB+) have further validated Nasdaq's improving balance sheet. Additionally, Nasdaq's plans to launch 23/5 trading in the second half of 2026 and a SEC filing to facilitate tokenized securities trading signal forward-looking innovation.
StoneX Group Inc. operates as a global financial services network that connects companies, organizations, traders, and investors to the global market ecosystem. Its business spans four segments: Commercial, Institutional, Self-Directed/Retail, and Payments. StoneX generates revenue primarily through transaction-based fees, trading spreads, commission and clearing fees, and interest income on client balances, making its earnings more sensitive to market volatility and trading activity.
Fiscal 2025 was a transformative year for StoneX, highlighted by the completion of six acquisitions, including the landmark acquisition of R.J. O'Brien — the oldest futures brokerage in the U.S. — and The Benchmark Company. R.J. O'Brien brought an attractive financial profile, having generated approximately $766 million in revenue and $170 million in EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) during calendar 2024. For the full fiscal year 2025, StoneX reported record net income of $305.9 million with diluted EPS of $5.89 and an ROE (Return on Equity) of 15.6%, exceeding its 15% target.
The company's fiscal first quarter of 2026 (ending December 31, 2025) delivered record quarterly net operating revenues of $724.4 million, up 47% year-over-year, and record net income of $139.0 million, with an ROE of 22.5%. The acquisition of R.J. O'Brien contributed meaningfully to listed derivatives and interest income. However, SNEX shares have experienced significant turbulence in recent weeks, pulling back sharply from their 52-week high of $94.66 to the mid-$70s, a decline of over 20%. The pullback reflects investor concerns about integration costs, legal expenses, and some earnings volatility despite the strong headline growth figures. StoneX also announced a three-for-two stock split, underscoring management's confidence in long-term value creation.
For traders seeking an analytical edge in evaluating stocks like NDAQ and SNEX, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for the current market environment. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers, each equipped with distinct trading styles, strategies, and timeframes. Only the most consistent, top-performing bots — those best suited to present conditions — earn a spot in this curated section. Some bots specialize in short-term swing trading, while others focus on longer-term trend-following approaches. Performance metrics vary across bots, with certain models achieving win rates above 70% and annualized returns that have outpaced broad market benchmarks. Each bot is fully transparent, with detailed statistics on drawdowns, trade frequency, and historical accuracy. To explore which bots are currently leading the pack, visit the Trending AI Robots page and discover the AI-driven strategies aligning with today's market dynamics.
The contrast between NDAQ and SNEX begins with their core business models. Nasdaq generates 76% of its revenue from Solutions — a mix of recurring SaaS, data, index licensing, and listing fees — creating a more predictable earnings stream. StoneX, conversely, derives the bulk of its revenue from transaction-based activities, physical commodity sales, and interest income on client float. This means StoneX benefits more directly from elevated market volatility and rising trading volumes, but also faces greater earnings variability when conditions turn less favorable.
From a valuation perspective, SNEX appears more attractively priced on a forward P/E basis at approximately 15.17, compared to NDAQ at 21.03. However, Nasdaq's premium reflects its higher-margin, recurring revenue model and its track record of consistent double-digit EPS growth. Nasdaq also returns capital to shareholders through dividends (currently yielding approximately 1.35%) and an active share buyback program, while StoneX reinvests all earnings and pays no dividend.
Risk profiles diverge meaningfully. Nasdaq carries a beta of 1.00, closely tracking broader market movements, while StoneX has a notably lower beta of 0.66, suggesting less correlation with broad equity indices — though its recent price swings tell a different story about its short-term volatility. StoneX also faces integration risk from its aggressive acquisition strategy, including the ongoing consolidation of R.J. O'Brien. Nasdaq's risks center more on regulatory exposure, competitive dynamics in listings, and the pace of technology adoption across its client base. In recent weeks, NDAQ has shown greater price stability, while SNEX has undergone a sharp correction, highlighting the divergent risk-reward profiles of these two names.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI models would likely favor NDAQ in the current environment. Nasdaq's combination of recurring revenue growth, expanding margins, a strengthening balance sheet, and AI-driven product innovation provides a more consistent trend profile that algorithmic models tend to reward. While SNEX offers compelling value metrics and demonstrated exceptional revenue growth in its most recent quarter, the stock's recent sharp drawdown and higher earnings variability introduce noise that probabilistic AI models may interpret as elevated near-term risk. That said, for models tuned to mean reversion or deep-value signals, StoneX's post-correction forward P/E and robust ROE could register as attractive. The AI verdict, therefore, is not absolute — it depends on the strategy and timeframe of the specific bot — but on balance, the steadier trend and diversified platform of Nasdaq appear better aligned with the conditions that AI-driven strategies currently prioritize.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NDAQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNEX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NDAQ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNEX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +2.28% price change this week, while SNEX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.20%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.94%.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
SNEX is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.01% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| NDAQ | SNEX | NDAQ / SNEX | |
| Capitalization | 52.7B | 9.26B | 569% |
| EBITDA | 3.43B | 2.53B | 136% |
| Gain YTD | -2.371 | 81.102 | -3% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.46 | 20.52 | 134% |
| Revenue | 8.74B | 152B | 6% |
| Total Cash | 2.79B | 37.4M | 7,452% |
| Total Debt | 9.24B | 21.8B | 42% |
NDAQ | SNEX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NDAQ's Valuation (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SNEX (73) in the null industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SNEX’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SNEX (37) in the null industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SNEX’s over the last 12 months.
SNEX's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as NDAQ (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
SNEX's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NDAQ (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
SNEX's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (79) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that SNEX’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
| NDAQ | SNEX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 14 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 33% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | -1.02% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SPGI - NDAQ | 68% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNEX has been loosely correlated with MRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNEX jumps, then MRX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNEX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNEX | 100% | -1.35% | ||
| MRX - SNEX | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| MCO - SNEX | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| MORN - SNEX | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| RJF - SNEX | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| NDAQ - SNEX | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
More | ||||