MCW
Price
$5.66
Change
+$0.02 (+0.35%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.85B
61 days until earnings call
PAG
Price
$187.63
Change
+$1.05 (+0.56%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.39B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCW vs PAG

Header iconMCW vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts MCW vs PAGBanner chart's image
Mister Car Wash
Price$5.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.35%)
Volume$953.23K
Capitalization1.85B
Penske Automotive Group
Price$187.63
Change+$1.05 (+0.56%)
Volume$160.25K
Capitalization12.39B
MCW vs PAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCW vs. PAG commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCW is a Hold and PAG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MCW: $5.66 vs. PAG: $187.63)
Brand notoriety: MCW and PAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCW: 55% vs. PAG: 72%
Market capitalization -- MCW: $1.85B vs. PAG: $12.39B
MCW [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $1.85B. PAG’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $12.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than MCW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCW is a better buy in the short-term than PAG.

Price Growth

MCW (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -0.88% price change this week, while PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +1.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCW is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.52% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($12.4B) has a higher market cap than MCW($1.85B). MCW has higher P/E ratio than PAG: MCW (21.77) vs PAG (13.06). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 25.888 vs. MCW (-22.359). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.73B vs. MCW (273M). PAG has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. MCW (26.4M). MCW has less debt than PAG: MCW (1.79B) vs PAG (8.41B). PAG has higher revenues than MCW: PAG (30.6B) vs MCW (1.03B).
MCWPAGMCW / PAG
Capitalization1.85B12.4B15%
EBITDA273M1.73B16%
Gain YTD-22.35925.888-86%
P/E Ratio21.7713.06167%
Revenue1.03B30.6B3%
Total Cash26.4M155M17%
Total Debt1.79B8.41B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCWPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFMDX16.48N/A
N/A
Clarkston Founders Founders
RYNVX167.16N/A
N/A
Rydex Nova Inv
PKSCX38.46N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core C
HEIIX13.77N/A
N/A
Hennessy Equity and Income Institutional
HBLFX15.07N/A
N/A
Hartford Balanced Income F

MCW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCW has been loosely correlated with DRVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCW jumps, then DRVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCW
1D Price
Change %
MCW100%
+0.35%
DRVN - MCW
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
RUSHA - MCW
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
PAG - MCW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
RUSHB - MCW
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
AN - MCW
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
More