MD
Price
$26.76
Change
+$0.62 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UHS
Price
$158.33
Change
+$7.75 (+5.15%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
9.58B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MD vs UHS

MD vs UHS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MD vs. UHS commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MD is a Buy and UHS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2026
Stock price -- (MD: $26.76 vs. UHS: $158.33)
Brand notoriety: MD and UHS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MD: 95% vs. UHS: 117%
Market capitalization -- MD: $2.2B vs. UHS: $9.58B
MD [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $2.2B. UHS’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $9.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $91.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UHS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MD is a better buy in the long-term than UHS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UHS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MD is a better buy in the short-term than UHS.

Price Growth

MD (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +10.99% price change this week, while UHS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +9.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +3.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

MD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

UHS is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+3.88% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UHS($9.59B) has a higher market cap than MD($2.2B). MD has higher P/E ratio than UHS: MD (11.42) vs UHS (5.96). MD YTD gains are higher at: 25.105 vs. UHS (-27.207). UHS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.8B vs. MD (285M). MD has less debt than UHS: MD (630M) vs UHS (5.13B). UHS has higher revenues than MD: UHS (17.8B) vs MD (1.93B).
MDUHSMD / UHS
Capitalization2.2B9.59B23%
EBITDA285M2.8B10%
Gain YTD25.105-27.207-92%
P/E Ratio11.425.96192%
Revenue1.93B17.8B11%
Total Cash329MN/A-
Total Debt630M5.13B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MD vs UHS: Fundamental Ratings
MD
UHS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
4544
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3887
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UHS's Valuation (11) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as MD (43) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to MD’s over the last 12 months.

UHS's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as MD (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to MD’s over the last 12 months.

UHS's SMR Rating (44) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as MD (45) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew similarly to MD’s over the last 12 months.

MD's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as UHS (60) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that MD’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.

MD's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UHS (87) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that MD’s stock grew somewhat faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDUHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UHS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEJ67.230.71
+1.07%
Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF
AFGE16.000.06
+0.38%
American Financial Group
IMCB96.960.26
+0.27%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
GTOC25.040.02
+0.09%
Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF
GHTA30.700.02
+0.08%
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

MD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MD and EHC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MD and EHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MD
1D Price
Change %
MD100%
+2.37%
EHC - MD
32%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
UHS - MD
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.15%
NHC - MD
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
HCSG - MD
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADUS - MD
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been loosely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UHS
1D Price
Change %
UHS100%
+5.15%
HCA - UHS
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.39%
THC - UHS
56%
Loosely correlated
+6.55%
PNTG - UHS
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ENSG - UHS
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EHC - UHS
37%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
More