ALV
Price
$121.85
Change
-$1.01 (-0.82%)
Updated
Aug 10, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNRO
Price
$11.69
Change
-$1.04 (-8.17%)
Updated
Aug 10, 04:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
397.99M
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALV vs MNRO

ALV vs MNRO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALV vs. MNRO commentary
Aug 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Buy and MNRO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2026
Stock price -- (ALV: $122.86 vs. MNRO: $12.73)
Brand notoriety: ALV and MNRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 61% vs. MNRO: 41%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $9B vs. MNRO: $397.99M
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9B. MNRO’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $397.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $76.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than MNRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNRO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MNRO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the short-term than MNRO.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while MNRO (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

MNRO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.05% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALV($9B) has a higher market cap than MNRO($398M). MNRO has higher P/E ratio than ALV: MNRO (55.35) vs ALV (14.49). ALV YTD gains are higher at: 5.098 vs. MNRO (-34.515). ALV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.43B vs. MNRO (91.5M). ALV has more cash in the bank: 377M vs. MNRO (9.53M). MNRO has less debt than ALV: MNRO (528M) vs ALV (2.19B). ALV has higher revenues than MNRO: ALV (11.1B) vs MNRO (1.14B).
ALVMNROALV / MNRO
Capitalization9B398M2,261%
EBITDA1.43B91.5M1,560%
Gain YTD5.098-34.515-15%
P/E Ratio14.4955.3526%
Revenue11.1B1.14B971%
Total Cash377M9.53M3,958%
Total Debt2.19B528M415%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV vs MNRO: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
MNRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
3790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5183
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNRO's Valuation (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as ALV (10) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRO (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's SMR Rating (37) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRO (90) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MNRO (83) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNRO (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew significantly faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVMNRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCSCX24.490.29
+1.20%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts C
AFDIX53.380.34
+0.64%
American Century Large Cap Equity Inv
NOSIX77.280.48
+0.62%
Northern Stock Index
JGQIX20.080.11
+0.55%
Jensen Global Quality Growth I
LSCNX24.600.02
+0.08%
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value N

ALV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been loosely correlated with APTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then APTV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALV
1D Price
Change %
ALV100%
+1.90%
APTV - ALV
64%
Loosely correlated
+7.02%
ALSN - ALV
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.27%
PLOW - ALV
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
DORM - ALV
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
XPEL - ALV
44%
Loosely correlated
+5.01%
More

MNRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNRO has been loosely correlated with PHIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNRO jumps, then PHIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNRO
1D Price
Change %
MNRO100%
+2.58%
PHIN - MNRO
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
LEA - MNRO
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.16%
ALV - MNRO
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
MGA - MNRO
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.75%
SMP - MNRO
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.64%
More