In the U.S. homebuilding sector, few rivalries capture the attention of traders and long-term investors quite like the one between DHI and PHM. D.R. Horton, America's largest homebuilder by volume, and PulteGroup, a margin-focused operator with one of the industry's most recognized brand portfolios, represent two distinct philosophies for navigating the cyclical housing market. With mortgage rates fluctuating, consumer confidence wavering, and construction costs under scrutiny from tariffs and labor dynamics, understanding how these two industry leaders stack up against one another has never been more relevant. This stock comparison examines their business models, recent performance, risk profiles, and market positioning to help investors assess the relative merits of each name in the current environment.
DHI, headquartered in Arlington, Texas, is the largest public homebuilder in the United States, operating across more than 125 markets in 36 states. The company's core strategy revolves around volume and affordability, with a heavy emphasis on entry-level and first-time move-up buyers. D.R. Horton's integrated platform extends beyond homebuilding — it includes DHI Mortgage for financing, Forestar for residential lot development, and a growing single-family and multi-family rental division. In recent quarters, the company has navigated a challenging demand environment by leaning on mortgage rate buydowns and other buyer incentives. Its fiscal 2025 results reflected the broader housing slowdown, with consolidated revenues declining year-over-year to approximately $34.3 billion. Still, D.R. Horton has returned significant capital to shareholders, repurchasing billions of dollars in stock and maintaining a quarterly dividend. Balance sheet strength — with total liquidity of around $5.5 billion and a debt-to-capital ratio near 20% — has enabled the company to sustain operations and reward shareholders even amid margin compression and softer order trends.
PHM, based in Atlanta, Georgia, operates in more than 45 markets across the United States through a carefully segmented brand portfolio. Its flagship brands include Centex for entry-level buyers, Pulte Homes for the move-up segment, and Del Webb for active-adult communities — a demographic niche where the company commands meaningful market share. This multi-brand approach allows PulteGroup to serve buyers across life stages and income levels, providing a degree of insulation when one segment faces disproportionate pressure. In recent periods, PulteGroup has delivered gross margins materially above the industry average, routinely in the mid-to-high 20% range, reflecting its emphasis on pricing discipline and build quality over raw volume. For full-year 2025, the company posted home sale revenues of roughly $16.7 billion and net income of $2.2 billion, while maintaining an exceptionally conservative balance sheet with a debt-to-capital ratio of approximately 11%. PulteGroup has also returned capital to shareholders through consistent buybacks, repurchasing over 10 million shares in 2025 alone, and has raised its quarterly dividend in line with its commitment to shareholder returns.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating the complexities of stocks like DHI and PHM, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to identify opportunities across thousands of tickers. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots, each with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics. These bots are not created equal — only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. The bots featured there span a wide range of performance profiles, with some tracking short-term momentum while others focus on longer-term trend-following or mean-reversion setups. With coverage across equities, ETFs, and crypto pairs, the platform empowers users to match their risk tolerance and investment horizon with an automated strategy. Explore the Trending AI Robots to see which strategies are resonating with today's market dynamics.
When comparing DHI and PHM, the most defining contrast is the volume-versus-margin philosophy. D.R. Horton's scale — closing roughly three times as many homes annually as PulteGroup — generates purchasing power and operational efficiencies that are difficult for rivals to replicate. However, this volume-driven model has historically produced lower gross margins, typically in the 21–24% range, compared with PulteGroup's consistent 25–29% range. PulteGroup compensates for lower unit volume with richer pricing power, particularly in its Del Webb active-adult communities, where demographic tailwinds support sustained demand.
From a diversification standpoint, D.R. Horton holds an edge through its Forestar lot-development arm and its expanding rental segment — both of which provide revenue streams outside the core home-selling cycle. PulteGroup relies more on brand and buyer-segment diversification, which has proven effective but lacks the vertical integration of its larger competitor. On the balance sheet, PulteGroup is the more conservative operator, with a debt-to-capital ratio roughly half that of D.R. Horton, giving it greater resilience in downturns but potentially less leverage-driven upside during recoveries.
In terms of recent momentum, both stocks have experienced volatility tied to mortgage rate movements and consumer sentiment shifts. PulteGroup's net new orders showed a 4% increase in its most recent quarter, a notable bright spot, while D.R. Horton's order trends have been more mixed, reflecting the higher sensitivity of its entry-level buyer base to interest rate fluctuations. Valuation-wise, PulteGroup has recently commanded a lower forward P/E multiple, presenting a potentially more favorable entry point for value-conscious investors, though D.R. Horton's scale and market share dominance command a premium that many institutional investors have been willing to pay.
Based on observable trend consistency, margin stability, and balance sheet resilience, Tickeron's AI would likely tilt in favor of PHM in the current market environment. PulteGroup's superior and more consistent operating margins, its lower financial leverage, and the demographic strength of its active-adult segment via the Del Webb brand provide a steadier foundation when housing demand faces persistent affordability headwinds. Additionally, PulteGroup's recent order growth, expanding community count, and disciplined capital allocation suggest a business that is managing the cycle with notably less earnings volatility than its larger peer. That said, D.R. Horton's unmatched scale, vertical integration, and aggressive shareholder return program make it a formidable contender — particularly if mortgage rates decline and entry-level demand reaccelerates. The AI's preference for PulteGroup reflects a probabilistic assessment that favors margin quality and financial conservatism under conditions of macroeconomic uncertainty, not a definitive prediction of absolute outperformance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DHI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DHI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DHI (@Homebuilding) experienced а -4.31% price change this week, while PHM (@Homebuilding) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was -1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.52%.
DHI is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
PHM is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| DHI | PHM | DHI / PHM | |
| Capitalization | 40.3B | 23.7B | 170% |
| EBITDA | 4.03B | 2.79B | 144% |
| Gain YTD | 0.233 | 6.421 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.48 | 12.02 | 112% |
| Revenue | 33.3B | 16.8B | 198% |
| Total Cash | 1.92B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 6.63B | 2.28B | 291% |
DHI | PHM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DHI's Valuation (56) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as PHM (64). This means that DHI’s stock grew similarly to PHM’s over the last 12 months.
PHM's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as DHI (60). This means that PHM’s stock grew similarly to DHI’s over the last 12 months.
PHM's SMR Rating (54) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as DHI (63). This means that PHM’s stock grew similarly to DHI’s over the last 12 months.
PHM's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as DHI (60). This means that PHM’s stock grew similarly to DHI’s over the last 12 months.
PHM's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as DHI (24). This means that PHM’s stock grew similarly to DHI’s over the last 12 months.
| DHI | PHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DHI has been closely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DHI jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHM has been closely correlated with DHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PHM jumps, then DHI could also see price increases.