MLM
Price
$572.25
Change
+$18.27 (+3.30%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
34.36B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMID
Price
$32.30
Change
+$3.55 (+12.35%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
168.12M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLM vs SMID

Header iconMLM vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts MLM vs SMIDBanner chart's image
MLM vs SMID Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLM vs. SMID commentary
Jun 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLM is a StrongBuy and SMID is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 10, 2026
Stock price -- (MLM: $572.25 vs. SMID: $31.68)
Brand notoriety: MLM and SMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLM: 96% vs. SMID: 147%
Market capitalization -- MLM: $34.36B vs. SMID: $168.12M
MLM [@Construction Materials] is valued at $34.36B. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $168.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $69.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $13.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the long-term than SMID.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMID’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMID is a better buy in the short-term than MLM.

Price Growth

MLM (@Construction Materials) experienced а -0.81% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was +1.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.31% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($34.4B) has a higher market cap than SMID($168M). MLM has higher P/E ratio than SMID: MLM (35.88) vs SMID (13.42). MLM YTD gains are higher at: -7.852 vs. SMID (-12.817). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.09B vs. SMID (18.4M). MLM has more cash in the bank: 273M vs. SMID (13.4M). SMID has less debt than MLM: SMID (4.69M) vs MLM (5.69B). MLM has higher revenues than SMID: MLM (6.35B) vs SMID (88.9M).
MLMSMIDMLM / SMID
Capitalization34.4B168M20,476%
EBITDA2.09B18.4M11,364%
Gain YTD-7.852-12.81761%
P/E Ratio35.8813.42267%
Revenue6.35B88.9M7,143%
Total Cash273M13.4M2,037%
Total Debt5.69B4.69M121,279%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLM vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
MLM
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1053
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4069
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6076
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3987
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMID's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as MLM (79) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (69) in the null industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's SMR Rating (100) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (100) in the null industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (76) in the null industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (87) in the null industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLMSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMID
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLBEX34.08N/A
N/A
Plumb Equity Investor
SUVAX13.35N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val A
FCCGX28.84N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth C
SCGVX21.75N/A
N/A
Sands Capital Global Growth Inv
FIDFX35.46N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Z

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
+3.30%
VMC - MLM
88%
Closely correlated
+3.34%
EXP - MLM
68%
Closely correlated
+5.12%
CRH - MLM
67%
Closely correlated
+2.14%
TTAM - MLM
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
BCC - MLM
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.00%
More