Advertisement
MLM vs SMID
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLM is a Buy and SMID is a Buy.
MLM | SMID | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMID's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as MLM (66) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (88) in the null industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's SMR Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (58) in the null industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (80) in the null industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.
SMID's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MLM (47) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.
| MLM | SMID | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 89% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MLM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SMID’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MLM (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.29% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
MLM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-1.64% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IREZ | 8.46 | 0.67 | +8.60% |
| Tradr 2X Short IREN Daily ETF (IREZ) | |||
| ERY | 9.31 | 0.17 | +1.86% |
| Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X ETF (ERY) | |||
| CFA | 96.96 | 0.38 | +0.40% |
| VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF (CFA) | |||
| RBIL | 49.86 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) | |||
| BITB | 45.57 | -0.22 | -0.48% |
| Bitwise Bitcoin ETF Trust (BITB) | |||
MLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLM | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| VMC - MLM | 88% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| CRH - MLM | 72% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| EXP - MLM | 66% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| TTAM - MLM | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| AMRZ - MLM | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||
SMID and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMID | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| BCC - SMID | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| EXP - SMID | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| TTAM - SMID | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.37% | ||
| AMRZ - SMID | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.66% | ||
| MLM - SMID | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
More | ||||