MORN
Price
$153.41
Change
-$0.27 (-0.18%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
5.83B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRU
Price
$64.43
Change
-$0.17 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
12.42B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MORN vs TRU

MORN vs TRU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Morningstar, Inc. (MORN) vs. TransUnion (TRU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MORN trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 20 compared to TRU's 31, indicating potential relative value in the investment research space.
  • TRU has a larger market capitalization of approximately $14 billion versus MORN's $7 billion, reflecting greater scale in credit data services.
  • Both stocks have encountered downward pressure in recent weeks amid broader market volatility, with MORN down significantly from its 52-week high.
  • TRU reported stronger-than-expected Q4 2025 revenue, bolstering near-term sentiment.
  • MORN exhibits higher profit margins (15%) and return on equity (26%) than TRU (10% and 11%, respectively).
  • Financial data providers like these benefit from ongoing demand for analytics, but MORN's lower beta (1.11) suggests relatively less volatility than TRU (1.71).

Introduction

This stock comparison examines MORN and TRU, two leaders in financial data and analytics. Both operate in the information services sector, providing essential insights for investors, lenders, and institutions. Traders seeking exposure to data-driven businesses may find value in evaluating their relative performance, valuations, and market positioning. In the current environment of economic uncertainty and shifting investor sentiment, understanding contrasts in growth drivers, risk profiles, and recent momentum can inform portfolio decisions for those focused on financial technology and services stocks.

MORN Overview and Recent Performance

Morningstar, Inc. (MORN) is a Chicago-based provider of independent investment research, including data, ratings, and analytics on mutual funds, ETFs, stocks, and private markets. Its platforms like Morningstar Direct and PitchBook serve advisors, institutions, and individual investors globally.

In recent market activity, MORN shares have declined sharply from their 52-week high of $316.71, trading around $176 amid broader sector pressures and market corrections. Year-to-date performance reflects a pullback of about 19%, though one-month gains of roughly 7% indicate short-term resilience. Influences include its Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings release, which highlighted steady revenue growth, alongside product launches like the Europe Modern Market 50 Index. Sentiment remains tied to demand for investment tools amid volatile equity markets.

TRU Overview and Recent Performance

TransUnion (TRU), also headquartered in Chicago, delivers credit reporting, analytics, and risk management solutions across U.S. and international markets. It supports financial services, insurance, and retail with consumer data and identity verification tools.

Recent weeks have seen TRU shares pull back from a 52-week high of $99.39, hovering near $73 following mixed market signals. The stock has shown year-to-date gains around 15% in some metrics but faces headwinds from economic slowdown concerns. Key positives include Q4 2025 revenue of $1.17 billion, surpassing estimates by 3.3%, driven by U.S. segment growth. Performance reflects sensitivity to consumer credit trends and interest rate dynamics, with valuation discussions highlighting opportunities post-pullback.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 350 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots rise to prominence based on adaptability to current market conditions, showcasing annualized returns ranging from 15% to over 100%, win rates of 55-75%, and profit factors up to 6.94. Strategies vary by timeframe—from 5-minute scalps to 60-minute swings—and focus areas like semiconductors, energy, and small-caps, with drawdowns managed via high profit-to-drawdown ratios (often 3-8). Diverse styles, including trend-following and fundamental analysis hybrids, cater to different risk appetites. Explore these bots to potentially enhance your trading edge in today’s volatile markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MORN and TRU both thrive in financial information services but diverge in focus: MORN emphasizes investment research and indexes, while TRU centers on credit bureau data and risk analytics. Growth drivers for TRU include international expansion and U.S. consumer lending recovery, contrasting MORN's reliance on asset management fees and subscription platforms.

Recent momentum shows both under pressure, but MORN’s lower P/E and higher margins offer value trade-offs against TRU’s scale advantages. Risk factors differ: TRU carries higher debt-to-equity (113%) and beta (1.71), exposing it more to rate hikes, versus MORN’s stability. Sector exposure ties them to financials, with sentiment shifting on economic data and earnings beats.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI analysis would likely favor MORN in the current environment due to its lower valuation multiples, superior profitability metrics, and lower volatility profile. While TRU benefits from scale and recent earnings strength, MORN’s trend consistency and relative positioning suggest higher probability of outperformance amid market uncertainty.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MORN vs. TRU commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MORN is a Buy and TRU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (MORN: $153.41 vs. TRU: $64.43)
Brand notoriety: MORN and TRU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MORN: 96% vs. TRU: 123%
Market capitalization -- MORN: $5.83B vs. TRU: $12.42B
MORN [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $5.83B. TRU’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $12.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $120.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $36.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MORN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MORN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MORN is a better buy in the long-term than TRU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MORN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MORN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TRU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MORN is a better buy in the short-term than TRU.

Price Growth

MORN (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -11.39% price change this week, while TRU (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -4.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -4.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

MORN is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

TRU is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-4.86% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRU($12.4B) has a higher market cap than MORN($5.83B). TRU has higher P/E ratio than MORN: TRU (17.85) vs MORN (15.69). TRU YTD gains are higher at: -24.603 vs. MORN (-29.033). TRU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.71B vs. MORN (773M). TRU has more cash in the bank: 733M vs. MORN (532M). MORN has less debt than TRU: MORN (1.91B) vs TRU (5.69B). TRU has higher revenues than MORN: TRU (4.73B) vs MORN (2.51B).
MORNTRUMORN / TRU
Capitalization5.83B12.4B47%
EBITDA773M1.71B45%
Gain YTD-29.033-24.603118%
P/E Ratio15.6917.8588%
Revenue2.51B4.73B53%
Total Cash532M733M73%
Total Debt1.91B5.69B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MORN vs TRU: Fundamental Ratings
MORN
TRU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3356
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7973
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9397
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MORN's Valuation (19) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as TRU (51) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to TRU’s over the last 12 months.

MORN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as TRU (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to TRU’s over the last 12 months.

MORN's SMR Rating (33) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as TRU (56) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to TRU’s over the last 12 months.

TRU's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as MORN (79) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that TRU’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

MORN's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as TRU (97) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to TRU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MORNTRU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MORN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPBI18.69-0.03
-0.16%
Central Plains Bancshares
HTHT42.40-0.11
-0.26%
H World Group Limited
KLC4.10-0.06
-1.44%
KinderCare Learning Companies Inc
HNI34.16-0.70
-2.01%
HNI Corp
IMTE0.49-0.02
-4.35%
Integrated Media Technology Limited

MORN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MORN has been closely correlated with FDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MORN jumps, then FDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MORN
1D Price
Change %
MORN100%
-0.18%
FDS - MORN
75%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
JEF - MORN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
SF - MORN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
SPGI - MORN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
PIPR - MORN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
More

TRU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRU has been loosely correlated with EFX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRU jumps, then EFX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRU
1D Price
Change %
TRU100%
-0.26%
EFX - TRU
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
SPGI - TRU
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
MCO - TRU
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
EXPO - TRU
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
MORN - TRU
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
More