MPC
Price
$310.85
Change
-$1.42 (-0.45%)
Updated
Jul 24, 02:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
91.16B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VLO
Price
$303.54
Change
-$1.72 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
90.64B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MPC vs VLO

MPC vs VLO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Marathon Petroleum (MPC) vs. Valero Energy (VLO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Marathon Petroleum reported full-year 2025 adjusted net income of $3.3 billion ($10.70 per diluted share) with $12.0 billion in adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), driven by strong refining execution and steady midstream growth.
  • Valero Energy posted full-year 2025 adjusted net income of $3.3 billion ($10.61 per diluted share) and returned $4.0 billion to stockholders, while achieving record refining throughput and ethanol production volumes.
  • MPC's integrated structure — anchored by its majority stake in MPLX, a publicly traded midstream master limited partnership — provides a differentiated and growing source of cash distributions, covering dividends and standalone capital spending.
  • Valero maintains a notably stronger balance sheet with a debt-to-capitalization ratio, net of cash, of 18%, versus MPC's more leveraged position, giving VLO additional financial flexibility.
  • Both companies have faced headwinds in renewable diesel margins, but are investing in high-return refinery optimization projects expected to enhance long-term competitiveness.
  • Investors comparing these two refining giants must weigh MPC's midstream diversification and higher capital-return firepower against VLO's operational track record, ethanol segment exposure, and balance sheet strength.

Introduction

When evaluating the U.S. refining sector, two names consistently dominate the conversation: MPC and VLO. Both are among the largest independent refiners in the world, with extensive Gulf Coast and mid-continent operations. Yet their business models, capital allocation philosophies, and growth strategies present important differences. This stock comparison examines how Marathon Petroleum and Valero Energy stack up across key dimensions — including financial performance, balance sheet quality, operational momentum, and market positioning — to help traders and investors make more informed assessments in the current environment.

MPC Overview and Recent Performance

MPC (Marathon Petroleum Corporation) operates as an integrated downstream energy company with three primary segments: Refining & Marketing, Midstream, and Renewable Diesel. The Midstream segment, operated primarily through its majority-owned partnership MPLX, has become a critical differentiator. For full-year 2025, MPC reported net income of $4.0 billion ($13.22 per diluted share), with adjusted EBITDA reaching $12.0 billion — up from $11.3 billion in 2024. Refining & Marketing margin averaged $17.60 per barrel in the third quarter, buoyed by higher crack spreads. Full-year refining utilization of 94% and margin capture of 105% underscored strong operational execution. In recent weeks, MPC has advanced several refinery optimization projects — including high-return investments at its Galveston Bay, Robinson, El Paso, and Garyville facilities — while completing a utility modernization at the Los Angeles refinery. The company returned $4.5 billion to shareholders in 2025 and ended the year with $4.4 billion remaining under its share repurchase authorizations. MPLX's growing distributions — projected at $2.8 billion annually — are expected to more than cover MPC's dividend and standalone capital spending, a structural advantage few peers can replicate.

VLO Overview and Recent Performance

VLO (Valero Energy Corporation) is one of the world's largest independent petroleum refiners and a leading producer of renewable fuels. The company operates through three segments: Refining, Renewable Diesel (via its Diamond Green Diesel joint venture), and Ethanol. For full-year 2025, Valero reported net income of $2.3 billion ($7.57 per diluted share), with adjusted net income of $3.3 billion ($10.61 per diluted share). The Refining segment delivered $1.7 billion in operating income in the fourth quarter alone, supported by record throughput volumes of 3.1 million barrels per day. CEO Lane Riggs highlighted that 2025 was the company's best year for mechanical availability, personnel safety, and environmental performance. In recent market activity, Valero has benefited from strong U.S. Gulf Coast throughput rates and favorable crude differentials. The company increased its quarterly dividend by 6% to $1.20 per share and returned $4.0 billion to stockholders during 2025, maintaining a payout ratio of 67%. Valero's ongoing $230 million FCC (fluid catalytic cracking) unit optimization at the St. Charles refinery — expected to come online in the second half of 2026 — is expected to enhance high-value product yields. The company's debt-to-capitalization ratio, net of cash, stood at a lean 18%, reflecting disciplined balance sheet management.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating stocks like MPC and VLO, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated window into the platform's most effective AI trading agents. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and sectors — but only the strongest performers with strategies suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These AI robots employ diverse trading styles, including swing trading, momentum scalping, and trend-following, across timeframes ranging from 5-minute intraday to multi-day holds. Performance metrics among top robots have shown annualized returns reaching well into the double and triple digits, with select bots achieving win rates above 65% and profit factors exceeding 2.0. Each robot comes with transparent statistics, including Sharpe ratios, drawdown profiles, and trade-by-trade histories. Whether you follow energy stocks or broader indices, exploring the Trending AI Robots can help identify data-driven strategies aligned with your trading objectives.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business Model and Diversification: MPC's integrated structure — combining refining, marketing, midstream (MPLX), and renewable diesel — provides multiple cash flow streams. The midstream segment alone contributed $6.75 billion in adjusted EBITDA in 2025, a stable, fee-based income source that partially insulates MPC from refining margin cycles. VLO, by contrast, is a purer refining play with complementary ethanol and renewable diesel operations through joint ventures. Valero's ethanol segment, which generated $117 million in operating income in Q4 2025, adds a distinct biofuel exposure that MPC — having divested its ethanol joint venture — no longer possesses.

Financial Strength: Valero holds a clear advantage on the balance sheet. With a net debt-to-capitalization ratio of just 18% and $4.7 billion in cash as of year-end 2025, VLO carries significantly less leverage than MPC, whose total consolidated debt stood at $32.8 billion with a debt-to-capitalization of roughly 58%. This gives VLO greater flexibility to sustain shareholder returns through commodity downturns.

Capital Returns: Both companies are aggressive capital returners. MPC returned $4.5 billion in 2025, while VLO returned $4.0 billion. However, MPC's structural advantage lies in MPLX distributions — a growing cash stream earmarked to fully fund its dividend and standalone capital expenditures, freeing up refining cash flow for additional buybacks. VLO's 67% payout ratio reflects a disciplined but slightly more conservative approach.

Operational Momentum: VLO achieved record throughput and ethanol production in Q4 2025, and its 97% refinery utilization in Q3 highlighted exceptional operational execution. MPC matched with 95% utilization and an impressive 105% margin capture rate for the full year. Both companies face similar macro headwinds — including weaker renewable diesel margins and regulatory uncertainty around biofuel policy — but have demonstrated the ability to generate strong cash flow through the cycle.

Risk Factors: MPC carries higher financial leverage and more exposure to West Coast refining, including California's stringent regulatory environment. VLO, having idled its Benicia refinery, has reduced West Coast exposure but faces policy uncertainty around the Renewable Volume Obligation (RVO) and Production Tax Credit (PTC) for renewable diesel. Both are sensitive to global crack spread movements and crude differentials.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable financial and operational trends, Tickeron's AI would likely view MPC as the more probabilistically favored candidate in the current environment — though with nuanced caveats. MPC's combination of a diversified cash flow base through MPLX, superior full-year earnings per share, a larger absolute capital-return program, and multiple high-return refinery projects underway suggests a broader set of near-term catalysts and structural supports. The MPLX distribution coverage model provides a quantifiable margin of safety that AI models tend to reward in comparative analysis. That said, VLO's stronger balance sheet, record operational metrics, and ethanol segment tailwinds represent compelling counterpoints that could shift the balance under different market regimes — particularly if refining margins compress and balance sheet resilience becomes the dominant factor. As always, AI-driven assessments are probabilistic, not predictive, and market conditions can evolve rapidly.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MPC vs. VLO commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPC is a StrongBuy and VLO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (MPC: $312.27 vs. VLO: $305.26)
Brand notoriety: MPC and VLO are both notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPC: 98% vs. VLO: 78%
Market capitalization -- MPC: $91.16B vs. VLO: $90.64B
MPC [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $91.16B. VLO’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $90.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $91.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $17.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVLO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MPC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPC is a better buy in the long-term than VLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VLO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLO is a better buy in the short-term than MPC.

Price Growth

MPC (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +2.10% price change this week, while VLO (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

MPC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

VLO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+0.12% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPC($91.2B) and VLO($90.6B) have the same market capitalization . VLO has higher P/E ratio than MPC: VLO (22.30) vs MPC (20.56). MPC (93.711) and VLO (89.561) have similar YTD gains . MPC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.4B vs. VLO (9.51B). VLO has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. MPC (2.15B). VLO has less debt than MPC: VLO (11.5B) vs MPC (34.3B). MPC has higher revenues than VLO: MPC (135B) vs VLO (125B).
MPCVLOMPC / VLO
Capitalization91.2B90.6B101%
EBITDA12.4B9.51B130%
Gain YTD93.71189.561105%
P/E Ratio20.5622.3092%
Revenue135B125B108%
Total Cash2.15B5.73B38%
Total Debt34.3B11.5B298%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPC vs VLO: Fundamental Ratings
MPC
VLO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4229
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
138
SMR RATING
1..100
3550
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6695
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPC's Valuation (73) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as VLO (84). This means that MPC’s stock grew similarly to VLO’s over the last 12 months.

VLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as MPC (13). This means that VLO’s stock grew similarly to MPC’s over the last 12 months.

MPC's SMR Rating (35) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as VLO (50). This means that MPC’s stock grew similarly to VLO’s over the last 12 months.

MPC's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as VLO (2). This means that MPC’s stock grew similarly to VLO’s over the last 12 months.

MPC's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as VLO (95). This means that MPC’s stock grew similarly to VLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPCVLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MPC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGR207.072.53
+1.24%
Progressive Corp
MTG28.96-0.08
-0.28%
MGIC Investment Corp
INLX5.45-0.03
-0.55%
Intellinetics
SCL57.60-1.34
-2.27%
Stepan Co
MPAA13.54-0.34
-2.45%
Motorcar Parts of America

VLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLO has been closely correlated with MPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VLO jumps, then MPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLO
1D Price
Change %
VLO100%
-1.82%
MPC - VLO
87%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
PSX - VLO
83%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
DINO - VLO
78%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
PBF - VLO
77%
Closely correlated
-3.70%
PARR - VLO
73%
Closely correlated
-2.28%
More