MS
Price
$119.27
Change
+$3.53 (+3.05%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
153.98B
8 days until earnings call
RJF
Price
$141.89
Change
+$3.79 (+2.74%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
26.84B
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MS vs RJF

Header iconMS vs RJF Comparison
Open Charts MS vs RJFBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$119.27
Change+$3.53 (+3.05%)
Volume$8.42M
Capitalization153.98B
Raymond James Financial
Price$141.89
Change+$3.79 (+2.74%)
Volume$1.79M
Capitalization26.84B
MS vs RJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. RJF commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a StrongBuy and RJF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (MS: $119.27 vs. RJF: $141.89)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. RJF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 120% vs. RJF: 117%
Market capitalization -- MS: $153.98B vs. RJF: $26.84B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $153.98B. RJF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $26.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than MS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.40% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +140.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

RJF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.78% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($154B) has a higher market cap than RJF($26.8B). MS has higher P/E ratio than RJF: MS (18.06) vs RJF (16.09). MS YTD gains are higher at: -4.499 vs. RJF (-8.027). MS has more cash in the bank: 4.29B vs. RJF (2.61B). RJF has less debt than MS: RJF (3.14B) vs MS (276B). MS has higher revenues than RJF: MS (50.7B) vs RJF (11.7B).
MSRJFMS / RJF
Capitalization154B26.8B575%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.499-8.02756%
P/E Ratio18.0616.09112%
Revenue50.7B11.7B433%
Total Cash4.29B2.61B164%
Total Debt276B3.14B8,795%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs RJF: Fundamental Ratings
MS
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1255
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
810
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6764
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RJF's Valuation (89) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (100). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (10). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (9). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (57). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (67). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INSM73.441.44
+2.00%
Insmed
PSMT89.080.95
+1.08%
PriceSmart
MITQ0.75N/A
-0.37%
Moving iMage Technologies
FINW17.04-0.10
-0.58%
FinWise Bancorp
CDLX1.82-0.07
-3.70%
Cardlytics

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
+2.74%
SF - RJF
79%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
MS - RJF
69%
Closely correlated
+3.05%
PIPR - RJF
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.94%
GS - RJF
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
LPLA - RJF
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
More