MUSA
Price
$398.00
Change
-$1.69 (-0.42%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.71B
34 days until earnings call
WINA
Price
$501.22
Change
-$6.09 (-1.20%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.8B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MUSA vs WINA

Header iconMUSA vs WINA Comparison
Open Charts MUSA vs WINABanner chart's image
Murphy USA
Price$398.00
Change-$1.69 (-0.42%)
Volume$359.36K
Capitalization7.71B
Winmark
Price$501.22
Change-$6.09 (-1.20%)
Volume$55.65K
Capitalization1.8B
MUSA vs WINA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WINA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MUSA vs. WINA commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MUSA is a StrongBuy and WINA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MUSA: $398.00 vs. WINA: $501.37)
Brand notoriety: MUSA and WINA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MUSA: 111% vs. WINA: 79%
Market capitalization -- MUSA: $7.71B vs. WINA: $1.8B
MUSA [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $7.71B. WINA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MUSA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWINA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MUSA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WINA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WINA is a better buy in the long-term than MUSA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MUSA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WINA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MUSA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WINA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUSA is a better buy in the short-term than WINA.

Price Growth

MUSA (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +5.80% price change this week, while WINA (@Specialty Stores) price change was +0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUSA is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

WINA is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.69% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUSA($7.71B) has a higher market cap than WINA($1.8B). WINA has higher P/E ratio than MUSA: WINA (44.65) vs MUSA (16.56). WINA YTD gains are higher at: 28.452 vs. MUSA (-20.390). MUSA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 996M vs. WINA (56.5M). MUSA has more cash in the bank: 54.1M vs. WINA (28.8M). WINA has less debt than MUSA: WINA (62.7M) vs MUSA (2.59B). MUSA has higher revenues than WINA: MUSA (19.5B) vs WINA (83.4M).
MUSAWINAMUSA / WINA
Capitalization7.71B1.8B428%
EBITDA996M56.5M1,763%
Gain YTD-20.39028.452-72%
P/E Ratio16.5644.6537%
Revenue19.5B83.4M23,381%
Total Cash54.1M28.8M188%
Total Debt2.59B62.7M4,131%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MUSA vs WINA: Fundamental Ratings
MUSA
WINA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
621
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3411
SMR RATING
1..100
162
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WINA's Valuation (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (74). This means that WINA’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

WINA's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (34). This means that WINA’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

WINA's SMR Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (16). This means that WINA’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

WINA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (62). This means that WINA’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

WINA's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUSA (77). This means that WINA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUSAWINA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MUSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WINA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACGIX23.18N/A
N/A
Invesco Growth and Income A
MLORX9.12N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy R
SLGFX22.23N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT)
IBBFX14.84-0.02
-0.13%
Thrivent Dynamic Allocation S
FINFX93.06-0.44
-0.47%
American Funds Fundamental Invs F2

MUSA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUSA has been loosely correlated with CASY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MUSA jumps, then CASY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUSA
1D Price
Change %
MUSA100%
-0.42%
CASY - MUSA
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
ORLY - MUSA
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
TSCO - MUSA
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
AZO - MUSA
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
CARS - MUSA
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
More

WINA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WINA has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WINA jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WINA
1D Price
Change %
WINA100%
-1.17%
CPRT - WINA
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
AN - WINA
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
HVT - WINA
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
CARS - WINA
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
ACVA - WINA
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
More