WFC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MVAL | WFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 24 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MVAL and BAC have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MVAL and BAC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MVAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVAL | 100% | N/A | ||
| BAC - MVAL | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| CPB - MVAL | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| WFC - MVAL | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
| MDLZ - MVAL | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| USB - MVAL | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.