NCPL
Price
$1.38
Change
-$0.17 (-10.97%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.48M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WULF
Price
$15.50
Change
+$0.59 (+3.96%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.54B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCPL vs WULF

NCPL vs WULF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCPL vs. WULF commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCPL is a Buy and WULF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCPL vs WULF: Fundamental Ratings
NCPL
WULF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4876
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NCPL's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (96). This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

NCPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (100). This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

NCPL's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (100). This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

NCPL's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (58). This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

NCPL's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (100). This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCPLWULF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (NCPL: $1.55 vs. WULF: $14.91)
Brand notoriety: NCPL and WULF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCPL: 25% vs. WULF: 96%
Market capitalization -- NCPL: $8.48M vs. WULF: $7.54B
NCPL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $8.48M. WULF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $590 to $304.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while WULF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NCPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WULF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NCPL is a better buy in the long-term than WULF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCPL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WULF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCPL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WULF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NCPL is a better buy in the short-term than WULF.

Price Growth

NCPL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +22.05% price change this week, while WULF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

WULF is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.59% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
NCPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WULF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDY612.705.89
+0.97%
Teledyne Technologies
VNCE10.150.08
+0.79%
Vince Holding Corp
WSBC37.620.20
+0.53%
WesBanco
BAOS0.24N/A
-0.34%
Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited
PRAA18.86-0.63
-3.23%
PRA Group

NCPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCPL and LGHL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCPL and LGHL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCPL
1D Price
Change %
NCPL100%
+25.00%
LGHL - NCPL
27%
Poorly correlated
-26.76%
WULF - NCPL
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
GLXY - NCPL
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
MARA - NCPL
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
BMNR - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
More

WULF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WULF has been closely correlated with HUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WULF jumps, then HUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WULF
1D Price
Change %
WULF100%
+0.74%
HUT - WULF
75%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
CLSK - WULF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.80%
CIFR - WULF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
RIOT - WULF
70%
Closely correlated
-2.68%
MARA - WULF
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
More