This comparison pits NKE, the athletic apparel giant, against OXM, a smaller player in lifestyle clothing brands. Both operate in the consumer cyclical sector, sensitive to economic shifts, consumer spending, and fashion trends. Traders seeking short-term momentum or investors eyeing value in apparel stocks may find value here, especially amid recent volatility from earnings reports, restructurings, and macroeconomic pressures. By examining recent performance, valuations, and market positioning, this analysis highlights relative strengths and risks in today's environment.
Nike, Inc. (NKE) is a global leader in designing, marketing, and selling athletic footwear, apparel, and equipment under iconic brands like Nike, Jordan, and Converse. With operations spanning North America, Europe, Asia, and beyond, it dominates the sportswear market through retail stores, digital platforms, and wholesale channels.
In recent market activity, NKE's shares have faced downward pressure, declining about 16% in April and hitting a 52-week low near $42 amid a 70% drop from pandemic-era peaks. Key influences include announced layoffs of 1,400 jobs as part of restructuring efforts, declining revenues, and mixed analyst sentiment on turnaround prospects. Year-to-date returns stand positive at nearly 30%, but volatility persists with a beta of 1.32, reflecting sensitivity to broader market swings and competition in athletic wear.
Oxford Industries, Inc. (OXM) focuses on lifestyle apparel, sourcing and distributing products under brands like Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, and others. It sells through e-commerce, department stores, and specialty retailers, emphasizing casual sportswear, dresses, and accessories primarily in the U.S. market.
Recent weeks have seen OXM navigate challenges post-Q4 fiscal 2025 results, which topped sales expectations but revealed a net loss due to Saks bankruptcy impacts and macroeconomic headwinds. Shares have shown resilience with YTD gains around 28%, trading from a 52-week range of $30.57 to $60.31. Profitability remains strained with negative margins and EPS, though a forward P/E of 9.53 suggests potential value. Sentiment reflects caution on revenue declines but optimism for green shoots in early fiscal 2026.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI-powered trading bots selected from over 351 available, curated for suitability in current market conditions like volatility in tech, industrials, and commodities. These bots deliver real-time signals across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, employing diverse strategies such as swing trading, scalping (short-term trades on 5-60 minute timeframes), and pattern recognition. Performance highlights include annualized returns up to +163%, win rates as high as 88%, profit factors around 4.5, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 17. Examples cover sectors like semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AMD), data centers, space stocks, and gold miners, with varying risk management. Explore these bots to align with your trading style and enhance decision-making in dynamic markets.
NKE and OXM both contend with apparel sector pressures but differ markedly in scale and focus. Nike's business model leverages global brand strength and innovation in performance gear, driving higher growth historically, though recent quarterly revenue grew just 0.1% YoY (year-over-year) amid competition. Oxford emphasizes lifestyle brands with U.S.-centric distribution, facing steeper revenue drops of 4.1% YoY and negative ROE (return on equity) of -4.9%.
Momentum favors neither decisively, with both posting similar YTD gains but NKE more volatile (beta 1.32 vs. 0.99). Risk factors include Nike's higher debt/equity at 79% versus Oxford's 109%, plus sector exposure to consumer spending. Valuation trade-offs pit NKE's premium multiples (PEG 1.37) against OXM's discount pricing and yield appeal. Market sentiment leans cautious for both, with Nike's catalysts in restructuring offsetting Oxford's brand realignments.
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward NKE with moderate confidence, citing its superior scale, positive EPS trajectory, and trend consistency despite recent dips. Factors like a robust balance sheet (ROE 16%) and analyst targets implying upside to $62 position it better relative to OXM's losses and narrower catalysts. However, OXM could outperform in a value rotation, underscoring the probabilistic nature of these signals.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NKE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOXM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NKE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OXM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NKE (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -4.45% price change this week, while OXM (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was +2.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -5.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.
NKE is expected to report earnings on Jun 30, 2026.
OXM is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
@Apparel/Footwear (-0.77% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
| NKE | OXM | NKE / OXM | |
| Capitalization | 64B | 566M | 11,307% |
| EBITDA | 3.6B | 34.6M | 10,399% |
| Gain YTD | -31.148 | 14.353 | -217% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.41 | 10.90 | 261% |
| Revenue | 46.5B | 1.48B | 3,146% |
| Total Cash | 1.69B | 8.13M | 20,827% |
| Total Debt | 11.2B | 563M | 1,989% |
NKE | OXM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OXM's Valuation (4) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as NKE (5). This means that OXM’s stock grew similarly to NKE’s over the last 12 months.
OXM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as NKE (100). This means that OXM’s stock grew similarly to NKE’s over the last 12 months.
NKE's SMR Rating (55) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OXM (93). This means that NKE’s stock grew somewhat faster than OXM’s over the last 12 months.
OXM's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as NKE (61). This means that OXM’s stock grew similarly to NKE’s over the last 12 months.
NKE's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is significantly better than the same rating for OXM (99). This means that NKE’s stock grew significantly faster than OXM’s over the last 12 months.
| NKE | OXM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 57% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NKE has been loosely correlated with COLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NKE jumps, then COLM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NKE | 100% | -4.45% | ||
| COLM - NKE | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| UA - NKE | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| LEVI - NKE | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| UAA - NKE | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| OXM - NKE | 50% Loosely correlated | +4.09% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXM has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXM jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.