Advertisement
NNN vs SRG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNN is a Hold and SRG is a Hold.
| NNN | SRG | NNN / SRG | |
| Capitalization | 8.42B | 108M | 7,796% |
| EBITDA | 875M | -35.03M | -2,498% |
| Gain YTD | 15.366 | -40.923 | -38% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.61 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 953M | 12.9M | 7,388% |
| Total Cash | 4.22M | 48.4M | 9% |
| Total Debt | 5B | 49.7M | 10,062% |
NNN | SRG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NNN's Valuation (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRG (86). This means that NNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRG’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRG (100). This means that NNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRG’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's SMR Rating (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SRG (95). This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to SRG’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SRG (86). This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to SRG’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRG (100). This means that NNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRG’s over the last 12 months.
| NNN | SRG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 47% | 10 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 81% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NNN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SRG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NNN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SRG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NNN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NNN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SRG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NNN (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.70% price change this week, while SRG (@Real Estate Development) price change was -7.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.12%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
NNN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
SRG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.24% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Real Estate Development (-5.22% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
Advertisement
NNN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNN has been closely correlated with O. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NNN jumps, then O could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNN | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| O - NNN | 79% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| ADC - NNN | 75% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| EPRT - NNN | 70% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| FCPT - NNN | 69% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| KIM - NNN | 68% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||
SRG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRG has been loosely correlated with EPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRG jumps, then EPR could also see price increases.