NSC
Price
$327.53
Change
+$3.76 (+1.16%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.55B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UNP
Price
$287.08
Change
+$2.04 (+0.72%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
170.37B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSC vs UNP

NSC vs UNP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) vs. Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) are major U.S. Class I railroads with overlapping Eastern and Western networks, making them direct sector peers for freight transportation exposure.
  • In recent market activity, UNP has shown stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance compared to NSC, reflecting differences in operational momentum and earnings delivery.
  • NSC faces near-term attention around its second-quarter 2026 earnings release scheduled for July 23, 2026, while both companies continue to navigate fuel costs, volume trends, and efficiency initiatives.
  • Business models emphasize intermodal, coal, chemicals, and agricultural freight, with UNP demonstrating record quarterly net income in the most recent reported period versus NSC’s profit pressures from legacy incident costs.
  • Relative positioning highlights trade-offs in scale, geographic coverage, and recent catalysts, including merger speculation that has periodically influenced sentiment for both stocks.
  • Market sentiment remains tied to broader economic indicators affecting rail volumes, with neither stock exhibiting extreme volatility relative to the S&P 500 in recent weeks.

Introduction

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) represent two of the largest publicly traded railroad operators in North America. Investors and traders frequently compare these stocks to assess relative performance within the industrials sector, particularly for exposure to freight transportation, supply chain efficiency, and economic sensitivity. This analysis appeals to those evaluating sector allocation, momentum strategies, or diversification within transportation equities, offering insights into how operational execution and market positioning differentiate the two names amid evolving freight demand and cost pressures.

NSC Overview and Recent Performance

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) operates a rail network spanning 22 states in the Eastern United States, primarily transporting intermodal freight, coal, chemicals, and automotive products. In recent market activity, shares have traded near the $319–$323 range, with year-to-date returns approximately 11–12%. Recent weeks have featured attention on productivity gains and a new short-line partnership enhancing connectivity, alongside ongoing effects from prior incident-related costs that weighed on first-quarter profitability. Sentiment reflects resilience in adjusted earnings metrics but tempered enthusiasm ahead of the July 23, 2026, second-quarter earnings release, as volume trends and fuel volatility remain key variables influencing near-term price behavior.

UNP Overview and Recent Performance

Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) manages an extensive Western U.S. rail network focused on intermodal, agricultural, energy, and industrial products. Shares have delivered stronger year-to-date performance in the 16–23% range during recent market activity, supported by record first-quarter net income of approximately $1.7 billion. Operational efficiencies and favorable volume trends have contributed to positive momentum, with the stock benefiting from broader sector tailwinds. Sentiment in recent weeks has been influenced by consistent earnings delivery and relative stability compared to peers, though it remains subject to the same macroeconomic factors affecting rail demand across the industry.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform’s most suitable AI trading bots for prevailing market conditions from among hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers. These bots feature varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore options aligned with specific risk tolerances or market views. Performance metrics such as win rates, average returns, and drawdowns differ widely across the collection, providing data-driven insights into automated approaches. For additional details on currently trending options, visit Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

NSC and UNP share similar business models centered on rail freight but differ in geographic focus, with NSC concentrated in the East and UNP dominant in the West. Growth drivers include intermodal expansion and efficiency programs for both, yet UNP has posted comparatively stronger recent earnings consistency and YTD momentum. Risk factors for NSC include legacy incident costs, while UNP contends with its own operational variables. Sector exposure to economic cycles is comparable, though recent sentiment has tilted toward UNP due to superior relative performance and record profitability in the latest quarter. Market positioning reveals trade-offs between NSC’s upcoming earnings catalyst and UNP’s demonstrated stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings delivery, and relative YTD positioning, Tickeron’s AI currently assigns a higher probability of near-term outperformance to UNP. This assessment reflects its record profitability and operational momentum versus NSC’s more mixed recent profit trajectory and pending earnings event, though outcomes remain subject to broader market conditions and volume trends.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NSC vs. UNP commentary
Jul 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSC is a Buy and UNP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 12, 2026
Stock price -- (NSC: $327.47 vs. UNP: $286.96)
Brand notoriety: NSC and UNP are both notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSC: 55% vs. UNP: 66%
Market capitalization -- NSC: $73.55B vs. UNP: $170.37B
NSC [@Railroads] is valued at $73.55B. UNP’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $170.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $170.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $45.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNP is a better buy in the long-term than NSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NSC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NSC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UNP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NSC and UNP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NSC (@Railroads) experienced а +1.48% price change this week, while UNP (@Railroads) price change was +1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

NSC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

UNP is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (+0.76% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNP($170B) has a higher market cap than NSC($73.5B). NSC has higher P/E ratio than UNP: NSC (27.59) vs UNP (23.62). UNP YTD gains are higher at: 25.350 vs. NSC (14.415). UNP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.1B vs. NSC (5.59B). NSC has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. UNP (1.04B). NSC has less debt than UNP: NSC (17.1B) vs UNP (31.5B). UNP has higher revenues than NSC: UNP (24.7B) vs NSC (12.2B).
NSCUNPNSC / UNP
Capitalization73.5B170B43%
EBITDA5.59B13.1B43%
Gain YTD14.41525.35057%
P/E Ratio27.5923.62117%
Revenue12.2B24.7B49%
Total Cash1.34B1.04B130%
Total Debt17.1B31.5B54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSC vs UNP: Fundamental Ratings
NSC
UNP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2535
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5444
SMR RATING
1..100
5023
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2721
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1738
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NSC's Valuation (86) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as UNP (86). This means that NSC’s stock grew similarly to UNP’s over the last 12 months.

UNP's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as NSC (54). This means that UNP’s stock grew similarly to NSC’s over the last 12 months.

UNP's SMR Rating (23) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as NSC (50). This means that UNP’s stock grew similarly to NSC’s over the last 12 months.

UNP's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as NSC (27). This means that UNP’s stock grew similarly to NSC’s over the last 12 months.

NSC's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Railroads industry is in the same range as UNP (38). This means that NSC’s stock grew similarly to UNP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NSCUNP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKH75.211.93
+2.63%
Black Hills Corp
ZEO0.640.01
+2.24%
Zeo Energy Corp
ABNB148.621.73
+1.18%
Airbnb
IRMD97.20-0.84
-0.86%
iRadimed Corp
LTRX5.60-0.10
-1.75%
Lantronix

NSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSC has been closely correlated with UNP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NSC jumps, then UNP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSC
1D Price
Change %
NSC100%
+1.14%
UNP - NSC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
CP - NSC
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
CNI - NSC
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
WAB - NSC
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
GBX - NSC
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More

UNP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNP has been closely correlated with NSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UNP jumps, then NSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNP
1D Price
Change %
UNP100%
+0.67%
NSC - UNP
87%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
CP - UNP
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
CNI - UNP
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
WAB - UNP
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
GBX - UNP
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More