This stock comparison examines two regulated natural gas utilities that occupy distinct niches in the North American energy landscape: Northwest Natural Holdings (NWN), a multi-utility operator with deep roots in the Pacific Northwest and an expanding Texas footprint, and Southwest Gas Holdings (SWX), a pure-play gas distributor serving high-growth markets across Arizona, Nevada, and California. While both companies benefit from the stable, rate-regulated utility model, they diverge in terms of scale, geographic exposure, growth strategy, and capital allocation priorities. For income-oriented investors evaluating dividend reliability and for growth-focused traders assessing rate base expansion potential, understanding how these two names compare in the current market environment is essential for informed portfolio positioning.
Northwest Natural Holdings, headquartered in Portland, Oregon, operates across three business segments: NWN Gas Utility (serving Oregon and southwest Washington), SiEnergy (a fast-growing regulated natural gas utility in Texas), and NWN Water (regulated water and wastewater services across five states). The company has served customers for over 165 years and has now amassed nearly one million utility meters across seven states. NWN has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years — a track record few publicly traded companies can match.
In recent months, NWN's stock has demonstrated solid upward momentum, trading near $51.68 with a 52-week range of $39.29 to $55.99. The shares have delivered a roughly 32% total return over the past year, supported by strong execution on the company's growth strategy. A pivotal development has been the acquisition-driven expansion in Texas — including the purchase of SiEnergy and, more recently, Pines Holdings — which has propelled combined customer growth above 10% on a trailing twelve-month basis. For the first nine months of 2025, adjusted EPS reached $1.52, a significant improvement from $0.88 in the prior-year period. Management expects full-year 2025 results to land above the midpoint of its adjusted EPS guidance range of $2.75 to $2.95, and the company targets long-term EPS growth of 4% to 6% compounded annually. Seasonal net losses in the third quarter are typical for NWN due to the weather-driven nature of gas demand, but the underlying earnings trajectory has drawn favorable attention from analysts.
Southwest Gas Holdings, based in Las Vegas, Nevada, has undergone a fundamental restructuring that positions it as a streamlined, pure-play regulated natural gas utility. Following the full separation and deconsolidation of its former subsidiary Centuri Holdings — which generated approximately $1.35 billion in net proceeds — SWX has repaid holding-company debt, strengthened its balance sheet, and earned S&P credit rating upgrades to BBB+ for both the parent and its operating utility. The company now serves approximately 2.28 million customers across Arizona, Nevada, and California, making it one of the larger gas-only utilities in the United States.
SWX shares have traded in a 52-week range of $75.75 to $94.47, recently hovering near $93. The stock has gained approximately 22% over the past year, with year-to-date gains of roughly 18%. Regulatory progress has been a key driver: Arizona approved an $80.2 million annual revenue increase, Nevada passed Senate Bill 417 enabling alternative ratemaking (regulatory frameworks that allow faster recovery of capital investments), and California rate updates went into effect. The utility delivered an 8.3% adjusted return on equity (ROE) for full-year 2025, while adjusted utility EPS grew approximately 8.7% year-over-year. Looking ahead, SWX has initiated 2026 EPS guidance of $4.17 to $4.32 and a 2026–2030 EPS CAGR target of 12%–14%, supported by a $6.3 billion capital expenditure plan and a rate base (the value of utility assets on which a regulated return is earned) projected to grow at 9.5%–11.5% annually. The Great Basin Gas Transmission expansion project, with an estimated $1.7 billion in potential incremental capital investment, adds an additional layer of long-term optionality.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's highest-performing automated trading agents. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and cryptocurrencies, only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a spot in this featured section. These AI robots employ diverse trading styles — including swing trading, trend following, day trading, and pattern recognition — across timeframes ranging from 5 minutes to multiple days. Performance metrics among the trending bots vary widely based on strategy and risk profile, with some achieving annualized returns exceeding 100% and win rates ranging from approximately 55% to over 67%. Profit factors, which measure the amount earned per dollar risked, have been observed as high as 4.53 in select bots. Each robot operates with distinct parameters: different sets of traded tickers, position sizing rules, stop-loss mechanisms, and entry/exit logic driven by Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs). For traders and investors seeking to complement their own analysis with data-driven, emotion-free automation, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can provide actionable insight into which strategies are currently resonating with the market.
The most fundamental contrast between NWN and SWX lies in scale and strategic focus. SWX, with a market capitalization of roughly $6.74 billion and over 2.28 million customers, is approximately three times larger than NWN by market cap. SWX has simplified its corporate structure into a focused natural gas utility, while NWN has diversified into water and wastewater services alongside its core gas operations. This divergence has implications for growth: SWX's projected 12%–14% EPS CAGR far exceeds NWN's 4%–6% target, though SWX's growth is partly driven by a substantially larger capital program ($6.3 billion over five years vs. NWN's roughly $450–$500 million annually).
Geographic exposure represents another key differentiator. SWX operates in some of the fastest-growing regions in the United States — metropolitan Phoenix, Las Vegas, and parts of California — where population and housing growth drive consistent meter additions at roughly 1.6%–1.8% annually. NWN's legacy Oregon and Washington territories offer slower but steadier organic growth, while its Texas acquisitions (SiEnergy and Pines) provide exposure to higher-growth Sunbelt markets. On dividend metrics, NWN holds the edge with a yield of approximately 3.8% and a 70-year streak of consecutive increases, compared to SWX's roughly 2.7% yield — though SWX recently boosted its dividend by 4%. From a risk standpoint, both utilities face regulatory risk in their respective jurisdictions, but SWX's recent credit upgrade and debt reduction post-Centuri separation have materially improved its financial flexibility. NWN, by contrast, carries net acquisition-related debt and higher leverage following its Texas expansion. Beta readings — 0.42 for NWN and 0.57 for SWX — indicate that both stocks are less volatile than the broader market, though SWX has shown slightly higher sensitivity to market moves.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, rate base growth trajectory, regulatory momentum, and balance sheet improvement, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely tilt in favor of SWX in the current environment. The combination of a completed corporate simplification, a credit rating upgrade, double-digit projected EPS growth, and a defined $6.3 billion capital expenditure runway provides a clearer near-term catalyst path than NWN's more modest and acquisition-dependent growth profile. SWX's pure-play focus and exposure to high-growth Western markets also offer a more concentrated thesis that algorithmic models tend to reward. That said, NWN's higher dividend yield, longer dividend growth streak, and diversified utility model may appeal to models prioritizing income stability and lower drawdown risk. The probability-weighted assessment suggests SWX holds a marginal edge in momentum and forward growth visibility, while NWN remains a competitive choice for income-centric portfolios. This assessment reflects a probabilistic, data-driven perspective and does not constitute individualized investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NWN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NWN’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
NWN (@Gas Distributors) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while SWX (@Gas Distributors) price change was -0.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.35%.
NWN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
SWX is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.
| NWN | SWX | NWN / SWX | |
| Capitalization | 2.14B | 6.67B | 32% |
| EBITDA | 483M | 878M | 55% |
| Gain YTD | 11.988 | 16.741 | 72% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.99 | 23.67 | 72% |
| Revenue | 1.29B | 1.78B | 72% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 485M | - |
| Total Debt | 2.68B | 3.51B | 76% |
NWN | SWX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NWN's Valuation (20) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWX (53). This means that NWN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWX’s over the last 12 months.
SWX's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as NWN (67). This means that SWX’s stock grew similarly to NWN’s over the last 12 months.
SWX's SMR Rating (64) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as NWN (78). This means that SWX’s stock grew similarly to NWN’s over the last 12 months.
SWX's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as NWN (51). This means that SWX’s stock grew similarly to NWN’s over the last 12 months.
NWN's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as SWX (73). This means that NWN’s stock grew similarly to SWX’s over the last 12 months.
| NWN | SWX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 51% | 15 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWN has been closely correlated with SR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWN jumps, then SR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWX has been closely correlated with SR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SWX jumps, then SR could also see price increases.