Blackstone Inc. (BX) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) are prominent players in the alternative asset management space, both heavily exposed to private credit amid recent market turbulence. Investors and traders comparing these stocks seek insights into relative resilience, growth potential, and sector risks like fund redemptions and higher financing costs. This analysis highlights their business models, recent price behaviors, and head-to-head metrics to aid decisions in a volatile environment favoring diversified managers. With both rebounding from lows, the comparison reveals trade-offs in scale, yield, and momentum for short-term traders and long-term allocators alike.
Blackstone Inc. (BX) is the world's largest alternative asset manager, overseeing vast assets under management (AUM) across private equity, real estate, credit, and hedge funds, serving institutional and high-net-worth clients globally. In recent market activity, BX shares have climbed roughly 19% over the past month from 52-week lows near $102, trading around $129 with a market cap exceeding $158 billion. This rebound follows year-to-date pressures from private credit redemption waves and software sector exposures, yet sentiment has improved on strong AUM growth, portfolio company IPO filings like Jersey Mike’s, and analyst upgrades eyeing $140 targets. Earnings beat expectations recently with EPS of $1.75, bolstering confidence despite broader sector challenges.
Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) specializes in alternative assets, emphasizing direct lending, GP stakes, and real estate credit through permanent capital vehicles and private funds. Shares have risen about 10% in recent weeks to around $9.90, up from 52-week lows near $8, with a $15 billion market cap, amid high short interest at 19%. Performance reflects private credit headwinds, including $5.4 billion in redemption requests and founder loan adjustments, offset by strategic moves like the $2.4 billion Sila Realty acquisition and $400 million bond sales. The stock surged 8% in a session on growth optimism in digital infrastructure, though year-to-date declines persist due to liquidity fears and elevated P/E ratios.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers out of 351 AI trading bots, each employing diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and multi-agent systems across timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. These bots trade thousands of tickers with impressive stats: win rates up to 88%, annualized returns reaching 168%, profit factors as high as 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 22. Whether focusing on leveraged ETFs, semiconductors, or penny stocks, they adapt to current conditions, highlighting only the most suitable for today’s market. Explore these high-performing options to enhance your trading edge.
BX and OWL operate in alternative assets but differ in scale and focus: BX’s diversified model spans private equity and real estate alongside credit, while OWL leans toward direct lending and GP minority stakes. Growth drivers include AUM expansion for both, though BX benefits from broader institutional inflows. Recent momentum favors BX with stronger monthly gains and lower volatility (beta implied lower), versus OWL’s higher yield but redemption risks. Sector exposures overlap in private credit, amplifying shared risks like software loan stresses, yet BX’s size provides better positioning amid sentiment shifts.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BX over OWL due to superior trend consistency, larger scale for stability, and stronger relative momentum in recent weeks. Observable catalysts like AUM growth and analyst targets suggest higher probability of sustained recovery for BX, though OWL’s yield offers income appeal in select scenarios.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BX (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.72% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.
BX is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BX | OWL | BX / OWL | |
| Capitalization | 140B | 6.55B | 2,138% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 951M | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.886 | -29.643 | 81% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.46 | 80.75 | 36% |
| Revenue | 12.6B | 2.94B | 428% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 3.86B | 368% |
BX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BX | OWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 23 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BX has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BX jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.