OWL
Price
$9.04
Change
+$0.40 (+4.63%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.11B
24 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TROW
Price
$118.53
Change
+$2.39 (+2.06%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.4B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OWL vs TROW

OWL vs TROW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OWL vs. TROW commentary
Jul 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OWL is a Hold and TROW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2026
Stock price -- (OWL: $9.04 vs. TROW: $118.55)
Brand notoriety: OWL and TROW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OWL: 106% vs. TROW: 38%
Market capitalization -- OWL: $6.11B vs. TROW: $25.4B
OWL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $6.11B. TROW’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $25.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $154.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTROW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TROW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TROW is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TROW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TROW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TROW is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

OWL (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.60% price change this week, while TROW (@Investment Managers) price change was +11.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

TROW is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.56% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TROW($25.4B) has a higher market cap than OWL($6.11B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than TROW: OWL (76.92) vs TROW (11.59). TROW YTD gains are higher at: 18.929 vs. OWL (-36.840). TROW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.17B vs. OWL (951M). TROW has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. OWL (190M). TROW has less debt than OWL: TROW (438M) vs OWL (4.36B). TROW has higher revenues than OWL: TROW (7.41B) vs OWL (2.94B).
OWLTROWOWL / TROW
Capitalization6.11B25.4B24%
EBITDA951M3.17B30%
Gain YTD-36.84018.929-195%
P/E Ratio76.9211.59664%
Revenue2.94B7.41B40%
Total Cash190M2.11B9%
Total Debt4.36B438M995%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TROW: Fundamental Ratings
TROW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OWLTROW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TROW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGIN35.610.10
+0.28%
VanEck Digital India ETF
QQQM290.95N/A
N/A
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
FDRX19.38N/A
N/A
Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF
MMTM304.79-3.65
-1.18%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® 1500MomtTiltETF
SAMT46.01-0.77
-1.65%
Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+4.63%
ARES - OWL
78%
Closely correlated
+2.88%
BX - OWL
74%
Closely correlated
+2.70%
TPG - OWL
73%
Closely correlated
+2.30%
KKR - OWL
71%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
APO - OWL
71%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
More