PACK
Price
$4.24
Change
-$0.03 (-0.70%)
Updated
Aug 15, 04:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
360.22M
81 days until earnings call
SW
Price
$42.88
Change
-$0.84 (-1.92%)
Updated
Aug 15, 02:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.83B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PACK vs SW

Header iconPACK vs SW Comparison
Open Charts PACK vs SWBanner chart's image
Ranpak Holdings
Price$4.24
Change-$0.03 (-0.70%)
Volume$300
Capitalization360.22M
Smurfit WestRock
Price$42.88
Change-$0.84 (-1.92%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization22.83B
PACK vs SW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PACK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PACK vs. SW commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACK is a Hold and SW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (PACK: $4.27 vs. SW: $43.72)
Brand notoriety: PACK and SW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PACK: 69% vs. SW: 77%
Market capitalization -- PACK: $360.22M vs. SW: $22.83B
PACK [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $360.22M. SW’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $22.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PACK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PACK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SW is a better buy in the long-term than PACK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PACK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PACK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PACK is a better buy in the short-term than SW.

Price Growth

PACK (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а +7.29% price change this week, while SW (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

PACK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

SW is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-0.50% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SW($22.8B) has a higher market cap than PACK($360M). SW YTD gains are higher at: -17.419 vs. PACK (-37.936). SW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.29B vs. PACK (64.5M). SW has more cash in the bank: 797M vs. PACK (65.5M). PACK has less debt than SW: PACK (431M) vs SW (14.2B). SW has higher revenues than PACK: SW (25.8B) vs PACK (375M).
PACKSWPACK / SW
Capitalization360M22.8B2%
EBITDA64.5M3.29B2%
Gain YTD-37.936-17.419218%
P/E RatioN/A168.15-
Revenue375M25.8B1%
Total Cash65.5M797M8%
Total Debt431M14.2B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PACK vs SW: Fundamental Ratings
PACK
SW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8362
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
9287
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1007
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SW's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PACK (93). This means that SW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PACK’s over the last 12 months.

SW's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as PACK (100). This means that SW’s stock grew similarly to PACK’s over the last 12 months.

SW's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as PACK (92). This means that SW’s stock grew similarly to PACK’s over the last 12 months.

PACK's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SW (60). This means that PACK’s stock grew similarly to SW’s over the last 12 months.

SW's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PACK (100). This means that SW’s stock grew significantly faster than PACK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PACKSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PACK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALIZF437.849.84
+2.30%
Allianz SE
CMHHF1.84N/A
N/A
China Merchants Port Holdings Company Limited
NNWWF35.74N/A
N/A
North West Company, Inc. (The)
QQFSF0.06N/A
N/A
Qinqin Foodstuffs Group Cayman Co Ltd
ATCMF0.09-0.01
-5.91%
Atico Mining Corp

SW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SW has been closely correlated with PKG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SW jumps, then PKG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SW
1D Price
Change %
SW100%
-3.10%
PKG - SW
69%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
IP - SW
68%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
SEE - SW
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
GEF - SW
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
SLGN - SW
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
More