PAG
Price
$173.36
Change
+$0.05 (+0.03%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
10.86B
25 days until earnings call
SIETY
Price
$100.00
Change
-$1.00 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAG vs SIETY

Header iconPAG vs SIETY Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs SIETYBanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$173.36
Change+$0.05 (+0.03%)
Volume$291.5K
Capitalization10.86B
D IETEREN GROUP
Price$100.00
Change-$1.00 (-0.99%)
Volume$225
Capitalization9.29B
PAG vs SIETY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. SIETY commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a StrongBuy and SIETY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PAG: $173.36 vs. SIETY: $100.00)
Brand notoriety: PAG and SIETY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 118% vs. SIETY: 55%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $10.86B vs. SIETY: $9.29B
PAG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $10.86B. SIETY’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $9.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSIETY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SIETY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PAG and SIETY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PAG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while SIETY (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

SIETY is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.57% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than SIETY($9.29B). SIETY has higher P/E ratio than PAG: SIETY (27.47) vs PAG (10.37). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 15.475 vs. SIETY (-5.196). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. SIETY (520M). PAG has higher revenues than SIETY: PAG (29.5B) vs SIETY (4.72B).
PAGSIETYPAG / SIETY
Capitalization10.9B9.29B117%
EBITDA1.79B520M343%
Gain YTD15.475-5.196-298%
P/E Ratio10.3727.4738%
Revenue29.5B4.72B626%
Total Cash96.4MN/A-
Total Debt7.74BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG vs SIETY: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
SIETY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
4861
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3230
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SIETY's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PAG (62) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that SIETY’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SIETY (8) in the null industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SIETY (61) in the null industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.

SIETY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PAG (44) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that SIETY’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

SIETY's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as PAG (32) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that SIETY’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTLB45.140.91
+2.06%
GitLab
VIAV10.000.15
+1.52%
Viavi Solutions
OPOF39.930.26
+0.66%
Old Point Financial Corp
CLDT7.17-0.01
-0.14%
Chatham Lodging Trust
AGRI0.79-0.04
-4.63%
AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+0.03%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
SAH - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
AN - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
More

SIETY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIETY and CARG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIETY and CARG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIETY
1D Price
Change %
SIETY100%
N/A
CARG - SIETY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
KMX - SIETY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
BBWI - SIETY
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.16%
PAG - SIETY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
SIEVF - SIETY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More