Advertisement
PH vs ZWS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) operates in motion and control technologies across industrial, aerospace, and other sectors, while Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) focuses on water management solutions.
- Recent market activity shows ZWS benefiting from a July 2026 earnings beat and an acquisition announcement, whereas PH awaits its fiscal 2026 fourth-quarter results scheduled for August 6, 2026.
- Both stocks operate in the industrials sector but differ in end-market exposure, with PH having broader diversification and ZWS tied more closely to water infrastructure and sustainability themes.
- Relative performance in recent weeks has reflected sector-wide trends in industrial demand, with ZWS showing momentum from corporate developments and PH positioned ahead of earnings visibility.
- Market sentiment for ZWS has been supported by growth initiatives, while PH sentiment hinges on upcoming results and broader industrial order trends.
- Investors comparing the two may weigh PH’s scale and diversification against ZWS’s specialized water focus and recent catalysts.
Introduction
This comparison examines Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS), two industrials-sector stocks with distinct business profiles. Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) provides motion and control technologies serving diverse end markets, while Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) delivers water management products and solutions. The analysis highlights recent performance patterns, business drivers, and positioning that may interest institutional investors, portfolio managers, and active traders evaluating relative opportunities within the industrials space amid current market conditions.
PH Overview and Recent Performance
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is a global leader in motion and control technologies, supplying components and systems for industrial, aerospace, and other applications. In recent weeks, the stock has moved in line with broader industrials trends, influenced by expectations surrounding the company’s fiscal 2026 fourth-quarter and full-year earnings release scheduled for August 6, 2026. Market participants have monitored order trends and margin dynamics across Parker-Hannifin Corporation’s (PH) diversified segments. Sentiment has remained measured ahead of the report, with attention focused on how macroeconomic factors and end-market demand have shaped results in the latest reporting period.
ZWS Overview and Recent Performance
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) is a pure-play water management business offering specification-driven solutions for health, safety, and environmental applications. Recent market activity has reflected positive developments, including second-quarter 2026 results that exceeded estimates and an announced acquisition of Intellihot in July 2026. The company also declared a quarterly dividend payable in September 2026. These factors contributed to sentiment in recent weeks, as investors assessed growth initiatives within the water infrastructure sector alongside overall industrial market conditions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated section of Trending AI Robots drawn from hundreds of available AI trading bots that operate across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions appear in this highlighted area. The bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets. Available data includes ranges for win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns that help users evaluate options. This section provides an informational resource for those exploring algorithmic approaches; visit Trending AI Robots to review current selections.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) differ in scale and focus. Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) maintains a larger, more diversified portfolio spanning multiple industrial applications, offering exposure to aerospace and broader manufacturing cycles. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) operates as a specialized water solutions provider, aligning with infrastructure and sustainability demand. Recent momentum has favored ZWS following its earnings beat and acquisition news, while Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) performance reflects anticipation of its upcoming report. Risk factors include Parker-Hannifin Corporation’s (PH) sensitivity to global supply chains and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation’s (ZWS) concentration in water-related end markets. Sector exposure overlaps in industrials, yet market sentiment has responded differently to each company’s near-term catalysts and positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, acquisition-related catalysts, and relative stability in market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS). The assessment considers trend consistency following the July 2026 developments and positions the stock ahead of Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) pending its earnings release. This view remains subject to new data and broader market shifts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PH is a StrongBuy and ZWS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileZWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- ZWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZWS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZWS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PH (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +9.97% price change this week, while ZWS (@Industrial Specialties) price change was +1.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +4.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.19%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was +2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
PH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
ZWS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (+4.22% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Industrial Specialties (+2.47% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
| PH | ZWS | PH / ZWS | |
| Capitalization | 135B | 8.53B | 1,583% |
| EBITDA | 5.63B | 471M | 1,195% |
| Gain YTD | 22.679 | 11.108 | 204% |
| P/E Ratio | 37.71 | 31.94 | 118% |
| Revenue | 21B | 1.79B | 1,175% |
| Total Cash | 476M | 365M | 130% |
| Total Debt | 9.58B | 550M | 1,742% |
PH | ZWS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZWS's Valuation (76) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PH (82). This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ZWS (32). This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
PH's SMR Rating (39) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ZWS (52). This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZWS (49). This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
PH's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZWS (82). This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
| PH | ZWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
ZWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZWS has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZWS jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| XYL - ZWS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| LECO - ZWS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| HLIO - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| HLMN - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| PNR - ZWS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||