PHIN
Price
$75.71
Change
-$2.43 (-3.11%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.8B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PLOW
Price
$50.27
Change
-$2.00 (-3.83%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PHIN vs PLOW

PHIN vs PLOW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PHIN vs. PLOW commentary
Jul 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PHIN is a Hold and PLOW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2026
Stock price -- (PHIN: $75.71 vs. PLOW: $50.27)
Brand notoriety: PHIN and PLOW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PHIN: 118% vs. PLOW: 94%
Market capitalization -- PHIN: $2.8B vs. PLOW: $1.16B
PHIN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.8B. PLOW’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $74.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PHIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLOW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLOW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLOW is a better buy in the long-term than PHIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PHIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLOW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PLOW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLOW is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -10.94% price change this week, while PLOW (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -6.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

PLOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.99% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.8B) has a higher market cap than PLOW($1.16B). PHIN (22.78) and PLOW (22.47) have similar P/E ratio . PLOW YTD gains are higher at: 56.050 vs. PHIN (21.746). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 447M vs. PLOW (96.1M). PLOW has less debt than PHIN: PLOW (235M) vs PHIN (1.04B). PHIN has higher revenues than PLOW: PHIN (3.57B) vs PLOW (679M).
PHINPLOWPHIN / PLOW
Capitalization2.8B1.16B241%
EBITDA447M96.1M465%
Gain YTD21.74656.05039%
P/E Ratio22.7822.47101%
Revenue3.57B679M525%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.04B235M442%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLOW: Fundamental Ratings
PLOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHINPLOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLOW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCTCX52.32-0.11
-0.21%
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq C
AVEWX24.33-0.12
-0.49%
Ave Maria World Equity
NPFCX69.24-0.36
-0.52%
American Funds New Perspective C
CGTRX9.35-0.08
-0.85%
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst2
QRSVX53.17-0.55
-1.02%
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Inv

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
-3.11%
ALV - PHIN
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.56%
LEA - PHIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
SMP - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
DAN - PHIN
55%
Loosely correlated
-5.00%
BWA - PHIN
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
More

PLOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLOW has been loosely correlated with MLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLOW jumps, then MLR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLOW
1D Price
Change %
PLOW100%
-3.83%
MLR - PLOW
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.77%
ALSN - PLOW
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
ATMU - PLOW
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
SMP - PLOW
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
PHIN - PLOW
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
More