Advertisement
PINS vs YELP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Pinterest (PINS) vs. Yelp (YELP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- PINS has outperformed YELP year-to-date with a gain of 22.56% compared to 6.65%, driven by anticipation around AI integrations and upcoming earnings.
- PINS trades at a higher forward P/E ratio of 32.87, reflecting growth expectations, while YELP's 12.66 suggests a more value-oriented profile.
- Analyst consensus leans overweight for PINS with targets around $23-27, implying upside, versus hold for YELP at $25.
- PINS boasts a larger market cap of $12.8 billion versus YELP's $1.6 billion, with broader global reach but higher volatility (beta 0.88 vs. 0.48).
- Both stocks have shown resilience in recent weeks, with PINS up over 12% in the past month amid ad market shifts.
Introduction
Pinterest (PINS) and Yelp (YELP) represent distinct players in the digital advertising and discovery space, with PINS focusing on visual inspiration and shopping via its global pinboard platform, and YELP emphasizing local business reviews and services. This stock comparison is relevant for traders eyeing internet and consumer tech sectors, particularly those tracking relative performance amid evolving ad landscapes, AI-driven enhancements, and macroeconomic pressures on discretionary spending. Investors assessing growth versus value trade-offs in social media stocks may find insights into momentum, valuation, and sentiment shifts valuable for portfolio positioning.
PINS Overview and Recent Performance
Pinterest (PINS) operates a visual discovery platform with over 500 million monthly active users (MAU), primarily generating revenue from digital advertising targeted at North American users. The company facilitates idea saving, searching, and shopping, positioning itself as a commerce enabler. In recent market activity, PINS shares have traded around $20, within a 52-week range of $13.84 to $39.93, reflecting volatility tied to ad revenue cycles. Performance has benefited from year-to-date gains of 22.56%, outperforming broader tech indices, fueled by investments in AI shopping tools and connected TV (CTV) ads amid competitive pressures in social advertising. Sentiment has improved with upcoming Q1 earnings expectations of $0.22 EPS and $964 million revenue, though monetization challenges persist.
YELP Overview and Recent Performance
Yelp (YELP) runs an online platform connecting consumers to local businesses across categories like restaurants, services, and retail, monetizing through cost-per-click ads and premium listings. With steady revenue from its established review ecosystem, the company maintains partnerships such as with DoorDash for ordering. Recently, shares have hovered near $28, in a 52-week range of $19.60 to $41.22, showing moderate YTD gains of 6.65%. Over recent weeks, YELP has risen about 10% monthly, supported by in-line Q4 results and resilient cash flow, though growth has slowed versus peers. Stable fundamentals, including a 9.94% profit margin, have bolstered confidence, despite broader sector headwinds in local ad spending.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 351 available, each designed for current market conditions like semiconductor booms, AI infrastructure, and volatility plays. These virtual agents employ diverse AI/ML strategies across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, with timeframes from 5 minutes to daily swings. Notable stats include annualized returns ranging from 30% to 164%, win rates of 50-88%, profit factors up to 7.0, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 10 in leading bots—such as those targeting NVDA or small caps with 60-97% returns. Trading styles vary from short-term scalps (TP 3%/SL 2%) to swing trades, covering thousands of tickers. Traders can copy these bots with customizable risk settings. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots for bots aligned with today’s trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
PINS and YELP both thrive on user-generated content for ad sales but diverge in models: PINS leverages global visual search for e-commerce inspiration, while YELP dominates hyper-local reviews for services. Growth drivers favor PINS with AI/CTV expansions versus YELP's steady but slower revenue from listings. Recent momentum tilts to PINS (12% monthly gain) over YELP (10%), though YELP offers lower risk via beta (0.48) and superior ROE (20%). Sector exposure links both to internet ads, but PINS faces fiercer competition from Meta/TikTok, while YELP contends with Google. Market sentiment is brighter for PINS pre-earnings.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor PINS over YELP, citing stronger trend consistency, higher YTD momentum, and catalysts like AI monetization and analyst upside to $25+. While YELP provides stability, PINS' relative positioning in growth-oriented ad tech suggests a probabilistic edge in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PINS is a StrongBuy and YELP is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PINS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYELP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- YELP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PINS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YELP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PINS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- YELP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PINS (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -8.58% price change this week, while YELP (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -0.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
PINS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
YELP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-0.98% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| PINS | YELP | PINS / YELP | |
| Capitalization | 10.9B | 1.24B | 882% |
| EBITDA | 350M | 245M | 143% |
| Gain YTD | -24.681 | -26.061 | 95% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.63 | 10.31 | 394% |
| Revenue | 4.37B | 1.47B | 298% |
| Total Cash | 1.3B | 110M | 1,181% |
| Total Debt | 1.21B | 155M | 777% |
PINS | YELP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
YELP's Valuation (57) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as PINS (66). This means that YELP’s stock grew similarly to PINS’s over the last 12 months.
YELP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as PINS (100). This means that YELP’s stock grew similarly to PINS’s over the last 12 months.
YELP's SMR Rating (45) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as PINS (76). This means that YELP’s stock grew similarly to PINS’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as YELP (63). This means that PINS’s stock grew similarly to YELP’s over the last 12 months.
PINS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for YELP (86). This means that PINS’s stock grew significantly faster than YELP’s over the last 12 months.
| PINS | YELP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 74% | 14 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 16 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
PINS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINS has been loosely correlated with CARG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINS jumps, then CARG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINS | 100% | -3.80% | ||
| CARG - PINS | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| THRY - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.71% | ||
| DASH - PINS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| Z - PINS | 39% Loosely correlated | -5.64% | ||
| YELP - PINS | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||