The industrial real estate sector continues to attract attention from income-oriented investors and growth-seeking traders alike, driven by structural tailwinds from e-commerce expansion, supply chain reconfiguration, and the emerging intersection of logistics with digital infrastructure. Two names that frequently surface in this conversation are PLD and STAG — Prologis and STAG Industrial — both publicly traded industrial REITs but operating at vastly different scales and with distinct strategic priorities. This comparison evaluates how these two stocks stack up in the current market environment, examining recent performance, business models, and the signals that AI-driven analysis tools are picking up.
PLD — Prologis, Inc. — is the undisputed heavyweight of the industrial REIT space, commanding a market capitalization of approximately $130 billion and a portfolio of roughly 1.3 billion square feet of logistics real estate across 20 countries. The company serves approximately 6,500 tenants, including global giants such as Amazon, FedEx, and Home Depot, though no single customer accounts for more than 5% of annual base rent, limiting concentration risk.
In recent quarters, Prologis delivered record-breaking leasing activity, signing 228 million square feet of leases during full-year 2025 — a company high. Core FFO per share reached $5.81 for the year, while occupancy levels improved to 95.8% by year-end. Cash Same Store NOI (Net Operating Income, a measure of property-level profitability) grew 5.7%. Perhaps most notably, Prologis has been aggressively expanding its data center power pipeline, reaching 5.7 gigawatts of capacity secured or in advanced procurement stages, alongside surpassing its 1 gigawatt target for installed solar and battery storage. BTIG recently raised its price target on the stock to $155, citing improving industrial fundamentals and the company's ability to outperform the broader REIT sector. The balance sheet remains fortress-grade, with A2/A credit ratings, $7.6 billion in liquidity, and a weighted average interest rate of just 3.3% on its debt.
STAG — STAG Industrial, Inc. — operates as a focused, U.S.-only industrial REIT specializing in single-tenant properties. As of year-end 2025, the company owned 601 buildings totaling approximately 120 million rentable square feet across 41 states. Its market capitalization stands at roughly $7 billion, making it a fraction of Prologis' size but still one of the more prominent names in the industrial REIT segment.
STAG delivered robust full-year 2025 results, posting Core FFO per diluted share of $2.55, a 6.3% increase from the prior year's $2.40. Total portfolio occupancy ended the year at 96.4%, with the operating portfolio reaching an even stronger 97.2%. Same Store Cash NOI grew 4.3% for the full year, while leasing activity remained healthy — the company signed 121 leases covering 14.4 million square feet during 2025, achieving cash rent spreads of approximately 24%. Moody's upgraded STAG's corporate credit rating to Baa2 with a stable outlook in mid-2025, reflecting improved financial standing. The company also refinanced a $300 million term loan, extending its maturity to 2030. With a dividend yield near 4.0% and 14 consecutive years of dividend increases, STAG has carved out a reputation as a reliable income vehicle.
For investors who prefer a data-driven approach to navigating comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only a select group earns a spot in the Trending AI Robots section — those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics. These bots span a wide range of trading styles and strategies, from short-term momentum plays to longer-duration trend-following models, with some bots showcasing historical win rates and annualized returns that consistently stand out against benchmarks. Each bot operates with its own set of statistics, performance metrics, and preferred tickers, allowing users to explore strategies that match their risk tolerance and objectives. To see which bots are currently favored by the AI, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Scale and Geographic Reach. The most immediate contrast is size. Prologis operates in 20 countries with roughly 1.3 billion square feet under management, while STAG's entire portfolio is concentrated in the United States with approximately 120 million square feet. Prologis' global diversification provides exposure to multiple economic cycles and currency regimes, whereas STAG's domestic focus means its fortunes are more closely tied to U.S. industrial demand and trade policy.
Business Model Nuances. Prologis runs a multi-pronged engine: core logistics leasing, a capital management platform that generates fee income from co-investment ventures, a development pipeline, and a rapidly scaling data center and energy business. STAG's model is simpler — acquire, own, and lease single-tenant industrial buildings under triple-net lease structures, with growth driven primarily by acquisitions and modest development activity.
Growth Drivers. Prologis is positioning for the next decade through its data center pivot, with management indicating that roughly 40% of 2026 development starts may be allocated to data centers. STAG's growth catalysts are more traditional: proximity to U.S. manufacturing Megasites (one-third of its portfolio is within a 60-mile radius of these large-scale projects), e-commerce penetration (31% of portfolio), and disciplined acquisition activity at cap rates averaging around 6.4-6.6%.
Risk and Volatility. Prologis carries a beta of approximately 1.32, meaning it has historically amplified broad market moves, while STAG's beta of about 0.97 suggests a more defensive posture. Prologis' exposure to global trade policy, currency fluctuations, and capital-intensive development introduces different risks than STAG's exposure to single-tenant vacancy risk and more concentrated U.S. industrial submarkets.
Valuation and Income. STAG offers a notably higher dividend yield at around 4.0% compared to Prologis' roughly 3.0%, appealing to income-focused investors. However, Prologis' net margin of approximately 41.5% dwarfs STAG's roughly 28.3%, reflecting the advantages of scale and operational leverage. On a price-to-FFO basis, Prologis trades at a premium multiple, consistent with its market leadership position.
Based on observable trend signals and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor PLD in the current environment, though with important caveats. Prologis benefits from multiple concurrent catalysts — record leasing momentum, a transformative data center opportunity, improving industrial fundamentals as new supply slows, and analyst consensus that points toward continued FFO growth. The company's global scale and A-rated balance sheet provide resilience that algorithmic models tend to reward. However, the AI would also recognize STAG's appeal: a higher dividend yield, lower volatility, and a clean, transparent business model that performs well in stable economic conditions. For trend-following strategies, Prologis' stronger recent price momentum and superior liquidity would likely tilt the scales in its favor, while income-oriented or risk-averse models might find STAG's steadier profile more suitable. Neither stock is categorically superior — the AI's preference depends on the specific strategy parameters, but the convergence of growth catalysts and market leadership gives Prologis a probabilistic edge in most momentum-weighted frameworks.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PLD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STAG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
PLD (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а +0.89% price change this week, while STAG (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +3.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -3.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.66%.
PLD is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
STAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
| PLD | STAG | PLD / STAG | |
| Capitalization | 135B | 7.9B | 1,710% |
| EBITDA | 7.88B | 691M | 1,140% |
| Gain YTD | 15.089 | 14.705 | 103% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.23 | 32.02 | 101% |
| Revenue | 8.95B | 864M | 1,036% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 34.7B | 3.23B | 1,075% |
PLD | STAG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STAG's Valuation (7) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLD (93). This means that STAG’s stock grew significantly faster than PLD’s over the last 12 months.
STAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLD (66). This means that STAG’s stock grew similarly to PLD’s over the last 12 months.
STAG's SMR Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLD (100). This means that STAG’s stock grew similarly to PLD’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as STAG (43). This means that PLD’s stock grew similarly to STAG’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as STAG (30). This means that PLD’s stock grew similarly to STAG’s over the last 12 months.
| PLD | STAG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 61% | 8 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 42% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLD has been closely correlated with EGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLD jumps, then EGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLD | 100% | -3.49% | ||
| EGP - PLD | 82% Closely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| FR - PLD | 81% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| TRNO - PLD | 78% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| STAG - PLD | 75% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| FRT - PLD | 70% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STAG has been closely correlated with EGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STAG jumps, then EGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAG | 100% | -1.13% | ||
| EGP - STAG | 80% Closely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| FR - STAG | 79% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| TRNO - STAG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| PLD - STAG | 75% Closely correlated | -3.49% | ||
| LXP - STAG | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||