Prologis (PLD) and STAG Industrial (STAG) are leading real estate investment trusts (REITs) in the industrial sector, capitalizing on e-commerce, logistics, and supply chain demands. This stock comparison evaluates their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid ongoing sector tailwinds like warehouse expansion and data center growth. Traders seeking momentum and income investors eyeing stable dividends will find value in understanding their relative strengths, scale differences, and responses to economic cycles in the current market environment.
Prologis (PLD), the world's largest industrial REIT, owns and manages over 1.3 billion square feet of logistics facilities across the Americas, Europe, and Asia. As a self-administered REIT, it focuses on high-barrier markets for e-commerce and distribution, with a strategic capital segment managing $60 billion in third-party assets. In recent market activity, PLD reported robust quarterly revenue of $2.3 billion and diluted EPS of $1.05, beating estimates and prompting analyst upgrades. Core FFO reached $1.50 per share, with cash same-store NOI (net operating income) growth at 8.8%. The stock has gained about 11% YTD and 34-38% over the past year, trading around $140 with a 52-week range of $103-$145. Sentiment is buoyed by expansions in data centers, joint ventures, and resilient warehouse demand, though higher debt levels tie performance to interest rates.
STAG Industrial (STAG) is a U.S.-focused REIT acquiring, owning, and operating single-tenant industrial properties across 41 states, totaling 120 million rentable square feet in 601 buildings. Emphasizing value-add acquisitions in Tier 1 markets, it targets diverse tenants via a proprietary risk model. Recent quarters featured Q1 2026 revenue of $224 million and core FFO of $0.65 per share, affirming full-year guidance of $2.60-$2.64. Net income EPS stood at $0.32, with the stock trading near $38 in a 52-week range of $33-$40. YTD performance is up 3-4%, with 12-16% over the past year, reflecting steady leasing amid slower growth. Positive factors include monthly dividends and portfolio expansion, though moderated by regional U.S. exposure and higher payout ratios versus peers.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots curated from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots, powered by advanced machine learning, deliver real-time signals for copy trading with no minimum balance, featuring win rates of 50-90%, annualized returns up to 227%, and profit factors of 1.5-3.0+. Selected for current market conditions like volatility in semiconductors, industrials, and leveraged ETFs, they employ diverse strategies—short-term scalping (5-60 minutes), trend following, or sector rotation—across timeframes from intraday to multi-day holds. Examples include semiconductor bots yielding 62-95% annualized returns on tickers like NVDA and LRCX, and industrials agents at 40-93% on ETN and PWR. Explore these high performers to enhance your trading edge in dynamic conditions.
Both PLD and STAG operate in industrial REITs, leasing warehouses to logistics and manufacturing tenants amid e-commerce growth. However, PLD's global scale and development pipeline drive superior revenue ($9B TTM vs. $864M) and EBITDA ($7.9B vs. $691M), with broader sector exposure including data centers. STAG counters with a nimbler U.S. single-tenant focus, lower debt ($3.2B vs. $35B), and monthly dividends yielding ~4% versus PLD's 3%. Recent momentum favors PLD (11% YTD vs. 4%), but STAG trades at a discount P/E (29x vs. 35x). Risks include interest rate sensitivity for both, with PLD facing currency fluctuations and STAG regional slowdowns. Market sentiment tilts toward PLD's catalysts like AI-driven logistics.
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor PLD due to its trend consistency, higher revenue growth, analyst upgrades, and positioning in high-growth logistics/data centers. With stronger YTD momentum and global diversification, PLD shows elevated probability of outperformance versus STAG's steadier but lower-upside profile, based on observable FFO beats and sector tailwinds.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTAG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PLD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STAG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
PLD (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а +3.83% price change this week, while STAG (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +2.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +1.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.43%.
PLD is expected to report earnings on Jul 20, 2026.
STAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
| PLD | STAG | PLD / STAG | |
| Capitalization | 134B | 7.37B | 1,817% |
| EBITDA | 7.88B | 691M | 1,140% |
| Gain YTD | 13.762 | 6.035 | 228% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.20 | 29.89 | 121% |
| Revenue | 8.95B | 864M | 1,036% |
| Total Cash | 861M | 8.86M | 9,722% |
| Total Debt | 34.7B | 3.23B | 1,075% |
PLD | STAG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STAG's Valuation (18) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLD (94). This means that STAG’s stock grew significantly faster than PLD’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as STAG (65). This means that PLD’s stock grew similarly to STAG’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's SMR Rating (79) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as STAG (79). This means that PLD’s stock grew similarly to STAG’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as STAG (52). This means that PLD’s stock grew similarly to STAG’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as STAG (37). This means that PLD’s stock grew similarly to STAG’s over the last 12 months.
| PLD | STAG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 53% | 21 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 44% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FNDX | 30.41 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large CompanyETF | |||
| UCRD | 21.47 | N/A | N/A |
| VictoryShares Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| JVAL | 55.42 | -0.04 | -0.07% |
| JPMorgan US Value Factor ETF | |||
| INDH | 39.29 | -0.71 | -1.78% |
| WisdomTree India Hedged Equity | |||
| PILL | 12.61 | -0.41 | -3.15% |
| Direxion Daily Phrmctcl&MdclBl3XShrsETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLD has been closely correlated with EGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLD jumps, then EGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLD | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| EGP - PLD | 82% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| FR - PLD | 81% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| TRNO - PLD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| STAG - PLD | 76% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| FRT - PLD | 70% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STAG has been closely correlated with EGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STAG jumps, then EGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAG | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| EGP - STAG | 89% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| FR - STAG | 88% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| PLD - STAG | 85% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| LXP - STAG | 82% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| TRNO - STAG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||