FRT
Price
$126.08
Change
+$1.25 (+1.00%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.78B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PLD
Price
$147.62
Change
+$2.50 (+1.72%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
135.3B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs PLD

FRT vs PLD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) vs. Prologis (PLD) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Prologis (PLD) are both blue-chip REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts) but operate in fundamentally different property sectors: retail-focused mixed-use versus global industrial logistics.
  • FRT holds the longest dividend-increase streak in the REIT industry at 59 consecutive years, while PLD has delivered a five-year annualized dividend growth rate of approximately 12.66%.
  • PLD's market capitalization of roughly $140 billion dwarfs FRT's approximately $10.9 billion market cap, reflecting Prologis's vast global footprint across 19 countries.
  • FRT has posted stronger year-to-date price appreciation (roughly 29%) compared to PLD (roughly 19%) through mid-July 2026, though both have outperformed the broader REIT sector.
  • PLD is aggressively diversifying into data centers and energy infrastructure, while FRT continues to deepen its competitive moat through premier retail and mixed-use properties in supply-constrained coastal markets.

Introduction

Comparing FRT and PLD offers a revealing look at two distinct approaches to real estate investment. Federal Realty Investment Trust, an owner of high-quality retail and mixed-use properties concentrated in affluent U.S. coastal metro areas, and Prologis, the world's largest industrial logistics REIT with a rapidly growing data center arm, represent contrasting bets on the evolution of commercial real estate. For income-oriented investors, dividend growth enthusiasts, and those evaluating sector allocation within a REIT portfolio, understanding how these two industry leaders compare across fundamentals, momentum, and strategic positioning provides actionable context in the current market environment.

FRT Overview and Recent Performance

FRT, or Federal Realty Investment Trust, is one of the oldest publicly traded REITs in the United States, with a portfolio spanning approximately 102 properties, including 27.4 million square feet of retail space and over 3,000 residential units. The company focuses on grocery-anchored shopping centers, mixed-use urban developments, and premium retail destinations in densely populated, high-income markets such as the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, California, and South Florida. Signature properties include Santana Row in San Jose, Pike & Rose in North Bethesda, and Assembly Row in Somerville.

In recent months, FRT has demonstrated notable price strength, gaining roughly 38% on a one-year basis and approximately 29% year-to-date through mid-July 2026. The stock has benefited from robust leasing activity—2025 marked a historic high of 2.5 million square feet of retail leases executed, with the strongest comparable rent spreads in over a decade (15% on a cash basis and 27% on a straight-line basis). Comparable portfolio occupancy reached 94.5% as of year-end 2025, while the leased rate stood at 96.6%. Core FFO (Funds From Operations, a key REIT earnings metric) came in at $7.06 per share for full-year 2025, and management has guided 2026 Core FFO to a range of $7.42–$7.52, implying 5.1–6.5% growth. The company also completed $340 million in acquisitions during late 2025, expanding into Nebraska and strengthening its Maryland presence. FRT's dividend, currently $1.13 per quarter ($4.52 annually), represents the longest consecutive annual dividend increase streak in the REIT sector at 59 years.

PLD Overview and Recent Performance

PLD, or Prologis, is the world's dominant industrial logistics REIT, owning and managing distribution facilities across 19 countries in key markets near airports, seaports, and major transportation corridors. The company's scale is immense: it controls roughly one billion square feet of logistics real estate, serving thousands of customers including e-commerce giants, third-party logistics providers, and global retailers. Beyond traditional warehousing, Prologis has aggressively expanded into digital infrastructure, securing a data center power pipeline of 5.7 gigawatts and surpassing its 1-gigawatt target for installed solar and battery storage capacity.

PLD's stock has climbed approximately 45% over the trailing one-year period and roughly 19% year-to-date through mid-July 2026. The company's 2025 was a record year for lease signings, with 228 million square feet of leases executed across its owned and managed portfolio. Core FFO per share reached $5.81 for full-year 2025, and Core FFO excluding net promote income hit $5.86. Operating metrics remain solid: average occupancy was 95.2% (Prologis share), cash same-store NOI (Net Operating Income) grew 5.7%, and net effective rent changes surged 43.8% in the fourth quarter of 2025. Prologis maintains a fortress balance sheet with approximately $7.6 billion in total liquidity, a weighted average interest rate of just 3.3% on its debt, and credit ratings of A2/A from Moody's and S&P respectively. Development starts totaled over $1 billion in Q4 2025 alone, with an estimated weighted average margin north of 20%, indicating substantial value creation potential.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like FRT and PLD, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse timeframes and market conditions. However, only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a spot in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ varied trading styles—ranging from swing trading and trend following to mean-reversion and momentum-based strategies—and each comes with its own performance track record, statistical profile, and set of traded tickers. Some bots specialize in REITs and real estate securities, making them potentially relevant for monitoring FRT and PLD. Bots featured in the trending section have typically demonstrated signals such as consistent trade accuracy, favorable risk-reward profiles, and adaptability to prevailing volatility regimes. To explore which AI trading bots are currently capturing market opportunities across real estate and other sectors, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The contrast between FRT and PLD begins with their underlying property sectors. FRT operates in retail and mixed-use real estate—a sector long viewed as structurally challenged by e-commerce disruption, yet one where FRT's focus on necessity-based, grocery-anchored centers in supply-constrained affluent markets has proven resilient. PLD, by contrast, sits at the epicenter of e-commerce tailwinds: its logistics warehouses are the physical backbone of online retail fulfillment, and its data center expansion positions it to capture secular growth in cloud computing and artificial intelligence.

On the income front, FRT offers a higher current dividend yield at approximately 3.7%, backed by the REIT industry's longest dividend growth streak (59 years). PLD's dividend yield is lower—around 2.8%—but its payout has grown at a much faster clip, with a five-year annualized growth rate of roughly 12.66% compared to FRT's more measured annual increases of roughly 2–3%.

From a momentum perspective, FRT has outperformed PLD on a year-to-date basis in 2026, though both stocks have delivered strong one-year returns well above REIT sector averages. PLD's larger size ($140 billion market cap versus FRT's $10.9 billion) provides unmatched liquidity and global diversification, but it also means growth must come from larger-scale capital deployment. FRT's smaller, more focused portfolio allows for more targeted value creation through redevelopment and tenant mix optimization.

Risk profiles also diverge. FRT's concentrated coastal exposure makes it more sensitive to regional economic downturns and shifts in consumer foot-traffic patterns. PLD faces risks from global trade policy uncertainty, elevated interest rates impacting development yields, and the capital-intensive nature of its data center ambitions. Both companies carry investment-grade balance sheets, though PLD's A-rated credit profile and 3.3% weighted average borrowing cost give it a slight edge in capital access.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings momentum, and strategic positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely lean toward PLD in the current environment—but with important qualifications. PLD's combination of record leasing volumes, powerful rent growth (net effective rent changes exceeding 40%), disciplined development margins, and exposure to the high-growth data center theme creates a multi-engine growth profile that AI-driven models tend to favor. The company's global diversification and fortress balance sheet add stability that algorithmic assessments typically reward. That said, FRT presents a compelling case based on its own merits: superior recent price momentum, the longest dividend growth record in REIT history, and exceptionally strong leasing spreads that confirm pricing power in its niche. For AI models prioritizing dividend reliability and relative value, FRT could emerge as the preferred choice. The probabilistic conclusion is that PLD holds a marginal edge in trend-based AI evaluation given its broader catalyst set, but the gap is narrow, and both stocks exhibit characteristics that signal quality within their respective REIT sub-sectors.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FRT vs. PLD commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Hold and PLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (FRT: $124.83 vs. PLD: $145.12)
Brand notoriety: FRT: Not notable vs. PLD: Notable
FRT represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while PLD is part of the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 100% vs. PLD: 190%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $10.78B vs. PLD: $135.3B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $10.78B. PLD’s [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] market capitalization is $135.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $135.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $9.63B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $17.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLD is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRT and PLD are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.42% price change this week, while PLD (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was -3.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

PLD is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.00% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (-1.50% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLD($135B) has a higher market cap than FRT($10.8B). PLD has higher P/E ratio than FRT: PLD (32.32) vs FRT (21.63). FRT YTD gains are higher at: 27.760 vs. PLD (15.423). PLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.88B vs. FRT (1.09B). FRT has less debt than PLD: FRT (4.93B) vs PLD (34.7B). PLD has higher revenues than FRT: PLD (8.95B) vs FRT (1.31B).
FRTPLDFRT / PLD
Capitalization10.8B135B8%
EBITDA1.09B7.88B14%
Gain YTD27.76015.423180%
P/E Ratio21.6332.3267%
Revenue1.31B8.95B15%
Total Cash18.6MN/A-
Total Debt4.93B34.7B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs PLD: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
PLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2613
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5965
SMR RATING
1..100
5481
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1830
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7330
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRT's Valuation (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLD (93). This means that FRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLD’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLD (65). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to PLD’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLD (81). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to PLD’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLD (30). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to PLD’s over the last 12 months.

PLD's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (73). This means that PLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTPLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWI158.050.77
+0.49%
Armstrong World Industries
SHEL87.950.18
+0.21%
Shell plc
XNCR19.530.02
+0.10%
Xencor
SHMD4.37-0.01
-0.23%
SCHMID GROUP N.V.
GIFT0.89-0.02
-2.71%
Giftify Inc

PLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLD has been closely correlated with EGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLD jumps, then EGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLD
1D Price
Change %
PLD100%
+0.29%
EGP - PLD
83%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
FR - PLD
82%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
TRNO - PLD
78%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
STAG - PLD
75%
Closely correlated
-1.94%
FRT - PLD
70%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
More