Prologis (PLD) and Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) represent prominent players in the industrial real estate investment trust (REIT) sector, focusing on logistics and warehouse properties amid rising e-commerce and supply chain demands. This stock comparison evaluates their business models, recent market performance, and relative positioning in the current environment of interest rate fluctuations and industrial demand shifts. Traders seeking momentum and growth catalysts, as well as long-term investors prioritizing dividends and stability, will find insights into key contrasts in scale, geographic focus, and financial metrics to inform portfolio decisions on relative performance and market positioning.
Prologis, Inc. (PLD) stands as the world's largest industrial REIT, owning and managing approximately 1.3 billion square feet of logistics facilities across 20 countries. As the sole general partner of Prologis, L.P., it operates through real estate (rental and development) and strategic capital segments, including co-investment ventures managing $60 billion in third-party assets. In recent market activity, PLD shares have shown resilience, trading around $140 with a year-to-date gain of 10.76% and one-year return of 37.80%, outpacing benchmarks. Strong Q1 results featured $2.3 billion in revenue and diluted EPS of $1.05, surpassing estimates and driving analyst upgrades with price targets up to $165. Sentiment has been bolstered by expansions into data centers ($1.2 billion in starts) and joint ventures enhancing logistics and digital infrastructure positioning, despite warehouse oversupply pressures. Profit margin stands at 39.65%, with quarterly revenue growth of 8.30% year-over-year.
Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) specializes in acquiring, owning, and operating industrial real estate across six major coastal U.S. markets: New York City/Northern New Jersey, Los Angeles, Miami, San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle, and Washington, D.C. Its portfolio includes 307 buildings totaling 20.2 million square feet, plus development land parcels. Shares recently hovered near $65, reflecting year-to-date performance of 10.88% and one-year return of 15.97%, demonstrating steady gains amid sector volatility. Recent leasing renewals, such as a 68,000 square foot deal in Washington, D.C., underscore demand for infill locations. Financials highlight exceptional profitability with an 84.59% profit margin and quarterly revenue growth of 32.60% year-over-year, supported by high occupancy trends around 98%. Analyst targets average $69.82, with recent maintains reflecting confidence in coastal market resilience, though at a smaller scale than peers.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots out of 351 total bots, chosen by AI analysis for their promise in current market conditions across sectors like semiconductors, industrials, and ETFs. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 59-75%, and profit factors ranging from 1.78 to 3.24. Examples include the Semi Boom bot at +83% annualized with 68% win rate trading LRCX and AMAT, and an industrials bot at +93% on FIX/SIJ pairs. With hundreds of AI trading bots available—employing diverse strategies, timeframes from 5-60 minutes, and covering thousands of tickers—only the most suitable for volatility, momentum, and sector rotation earn a trending spot. Explore these bots to potentially enhance your trading edge with data-driven performance insights.
Both PLD and TRNO operate in the industrial REIT space, capitalizing on logistics demand, but differ markedly in scale and scope. PLD's global portfolio and strategic capital arm provide diversified growth drivers like data centers and international ventures, contrasting TRNO's niche focus on premium coastal U.S. infill sites with lower debt/equity (22.83% vs. 60.93%). Recent momentum favors PLD with superior one-year returns and Q1 beats, while TRNO excels in valuation (P/E 16.51 vs. 35.53) and ROE (10.32% vs. 6.84%). Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity for both, but PLD faces global oversupply, whereas TRNO benefits from tight coastal markets. Market sentiment leans positive for PLD post-earnings, with broader analyst upgrades, versus TRNO's steady but localized appeal.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors PLD due to its trend consistency from strong Q1 results, global catalysts like data center growth, and superior relative one-year positioning amid logistics demand. While TRNO offers attractive valuation and stability, PLD's scale and momentum suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, based on observable earnings beats and analyst revisions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRNO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PLD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRNO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
PLD (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а +2.49% price change this week, while TRNO (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.09%.
PLD is expected to report earnings on Jul 20, 2026.
TRNO is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
| PLD | TRNO | PLD / TRNO | |
| Capitalization | 134B | 6.97B | 1,923% |
| EBITDA | 7.88B | 582M | 1,354% |
| Gain YTD | 13.518 | 13.217 | 102% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.12 | 16.08 | 225% |
| Revenue | 8.95B | 490M | 1,826% |
| Total Cash | 861M | 87.9M | 980% |
| Total Debt | 34.7B | 942M | 3,684% |
PLD | TRNO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TRNO's Valuation (20) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLD (94). This means that TRNO’s stock grew significantly faster than PLD’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as TRNO (74). This means that PLD’s stock grew similarly to TRNO’s over the last 12 months.
TRNO's SMR Rating (69) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLD (79). This means that TRNO’s stock grew similarly to PLD’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as TRNO (51). This means that PLD’s stock grew similarly to TRNO’s over the last 12 months.
PLD's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRNO (91). This means that PLD’s stock grew significantly faster than TRNO’s over the last 12 months.
| PLD | TRNO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 6 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FNDX | 30.42 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large CompanyETF | |||
| UCRD | 21.42 | -0.06 | -0.27% |
| VictoryShares Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| PILL | 12.52 | -0.09 | -0.71% |
| Direxion Daily Phrmctcl&MdclBl3XShrsETF | |||
| JVAL | 54.90 | -0.52 | -0.93% |
| JPMorgan US Value Factor ETF | |||
| INDH | 38.70 | -0.59 | -1.49% |
| WisdomTree India Hedged Equity | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLD has been closely correlated with EGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLD jumps, then EGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLD | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| EGP - PLD | 82% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| FR - PLD | 81% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| TRNO - PLD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| STAG - PLD | 76% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| FRT - PLD | 70% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||