This comparison examines PPG Industries and The Sherwin-Williams Company, two leading companies in the global paints and coatings industry. Investors and traders focused on materials sector exposure, relative valuation, and momentum within specialty chemicals may find the analysis relevant. The review highlights business models, recent performance trends, and key differentiators to support informed evaluation of their market positioning.
PPG Industries produces paints, coatings, and specialty materials serving industrial, aerospace, automotive, and architectural markets. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience with positive year-to-date returns amid broader sector volatility. Performance has been supported by exposure to high-growth areas such as aerospace coatings, though tempered by fluctuations in industrial demand. Recent weeks reflect mixed price behavior influenced by earnings expectations and macroeconomic conditions affecting raw material costs.
The Sherwin-Williams Company operates through its Paint Stores Group and global brands, focusing on architectural, industrial, and marine coatings with a significant retail presence. Recent market activity indicates underperformance relative to broader indices, with modest or negative year-to-date results. The stock has been affected by softer construction and renovation demand, offset partially by operational scale and international expansion efforts. Sentiment in recent weeks has reflected ongoing sector challenges while highlighting the company's established distribution advantages.
Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots designed for various market conditions. Hundreds of AI Trading Bots trade thousands of different tickers across multiple styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only the strongest and most suitable for prevailing conditions appear in the Trending AI Robots section, which currently features approximately 30 bots selected from roughly 300 total available. These demonstrate performance metrics reaching up to +241% returns alongside win rates in the 70–80% range in targeted segments such as semiconductors and growth stocks. The bots encompass diverse approaches powered by adaptive models. Explore the full range on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and strategy options.
PPG and SHW share core exposure to coatings but differ in scale and focus. SHW benefits from integrated retail distribution and larger overall footprint, supporting more consistent cash flows, while PPG offers greater diversification into aerospace and industrial verticals. Recent momentum favors PPG on a year-to-date basis, contrasting with SHW's longer-term total return advantage. Valuation presents a trade-off, with PPG appearing more discounted and SHW commanding a premium tied to its market leadership. Risk factors include cyclical demand sensitivity for both, alongside raw material price volatility. Market sentiment remains neutral to cautious amid construction sector headwinds, with relative positioning hinging on investor preference for value versus quality characteristics.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, financial strength, and market positioning, Tickeron AI models would likely express a probabilistic preference for SHW over PPG in the current environment. SHW's superior cash flow generation, scale, and embedded competitive advantages in its distribution network provide a more stable foundation amid macro uncertainty. The analysis would also recognize PPG's discounted valuation and growth verticals as potentially attractive for certain strategies. The outcome depends on specific model parameters, risk tolerance, and time horizon.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PPG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PPG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
PPG (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -1.51% price change this week, while SHW (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +7.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.88%.
PPG is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
SHW is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| PPG | SHW | PPG / SHW | |
| Capitalization | 24.9B | 83.7B | 30% |
| EBITDA | 2.85B | 4.56B | 62% |
| Gain YTD | 10.686 | 6.636 | 161% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.07 | 31.81 | 51% |
| Revenue | 16.1B | 23.9B | 67% |
| Total Cash | 1.62B | 217M | 748% |
| Total Debt | 7.73B | 13.8B | 56% |
PPG | SHW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PPG's Valuation (28) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHW (90). This means that PPG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHW’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPG (100). This means that SHW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPG’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's SMR Rating (19) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as PPG (44). This means that SHW’s stock grew similarly to PPG’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as PPG (50). This means that SHW’s stock grew similarly to PPG’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as PPG (77). This means that SHW’s stock grew similarly to PPG’s over the last 12 months.
| PPG | SHW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 60% | 10 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 50% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHW has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHW jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHW | 100% | -2.93% | ||
| RPM - SHW | 74% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| PPG - SHW | 71% Closely correlated | -6.03% | ||
| AXTA - SHW | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| AVNT - SHW | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| FUL - SHW | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
More | ||||