AFRM
Price
$71.44
Change
+$3.45 (+5.07%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
24.11B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRTH
Price
$5.94
Change
+$0.18 (+3.12%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
489.7M
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs PRTH

AFRM vs PRTH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. PRTH commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and PRTH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($24.1B) has a higher market cap than PRTH($490M). AFRM has higher P/E ratio than PRTH: AFRM (12.92) vs PRTH (8.87). PRTH YTD gains are higher at: 8.991 vs. AFRM (-4.017). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.25B vs. PRTH (208M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.6B vs. PRTH (120M). PRTH has less debt than AFRM: PRTH (1.05B) vs AFRM (10B). AFRM has higher revenues than PRTH: AFRM (4.26B) vs PRTH (1B).
AFRMPRTHAFRM / PRTH
Capitalization24.1B490M4,918%
EBITDA1.25B208M601%
Gain YTD-4.0178.991-45%
P/E Ratio12.928.87146%
Revenue4.26B1B426%
Total Cash2.6B120M2,169%
Total Debt10B1.05B954%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRTH: Fundamental Ratings
PRTH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMPRTH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (AFRM: $71.44 vs. PRTH: $5.94)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and PRTH are both not notable
AFRM represents the Savings Banks, while PRTH is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 118% vs. PRTH: 174%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $24.11B vs. PRTH: $489.7M
AFRM [@Savings Banks] is valued at $24.11B. PRTH’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $489.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $1.46M to $696.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $38.71K to $3.68T. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $34.3B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $34.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PRTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRTH is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRTH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRTH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRTH is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.26% price change this week, while PRTH (@Computer Communications) price change was +7.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

PRTH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.79% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Computer Communications (-3.13% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
AFRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRTH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YHGJ2.700.05
+1.89%
Yunhong Green CTI Ltd.
DGX235.023.88
+1.68%
Quest Diagnostics
SMID24.490.26
+1.07%
Smith-Midland Corp
BCSF11.470.07
+0.61%
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
LBTYA10.47-0.15
-1.41%
Liberty Global Ltd

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
+5.07%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
+6.80%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
UPST - AFRM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
SOFI - AFRM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
More

PRTH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRTH has been loosely correlated with ALIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRTH jumps, then ALIT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRTH
1D Price
Change %
PRTH100%
+3.04%
ALIT - PRTH
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
XYZ - PRTH
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
AFRM - PRTH
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.07%
CCSI - PRTH
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
TOST - PRTH
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
More