AFRM
Price
$81.93
Change
-$1.49 (-1.79%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
27.42B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRTH
Price
$7.13
Change
+$0.02 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
587.19M
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs PRTH

AFRM vs PRTH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. PRTH commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Buy and PRTH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (AFRM: $81.93 vs. PRTH: $7.13)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and PRTH are both not notable
AFRM represents the Savings Banks, while PRTH is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 34% vs. PRTH: 70%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $27.42B vs. PRTH: $587.19M
AFRM [@Savings Banks] is valued at $27.42B. PRTH’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $587.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $680.35B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $33.36B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $29.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRTH is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRTH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRTH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the short-term than PRTH.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Savings Banks) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while PRTH (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.47%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -4.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.

PRTH is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-3.70% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Computer Communications (-4.12% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($27.4B) has a higher market cap than PRTH($587M). AFRM has higher P/E ratio than PRTH: AFRM (74.45) vs PRTH (10.19). PRTH YTD gains are higher at: 30.826 vs. AFRM (10.077). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. PRTH (205M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. PRTH (92.2M). PRTH has less debt than AFRM: PRTH (1.05B) vs AFRM (9.09B). AFRM has higher revenues than PRTH: AFRM (3.97B) vs PRTH (978M).
AFRMPRTHAFRM / PRTH
Capitalization27.4B587M4,668%
EBITDA1.12B205M545%
Gain YTD10.07730.82633%
P/E Ratio74.4510.19731%
Revenue3.97B978M406%
Total Cash2.48B92.2M2,691%
Total Debt9.09B1.05B869%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRTH: Fundamental Ratings
PRTH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMPRTH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRTH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRSRX15.07N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R3
GOFIX25.18N/A
N/A
GMO Resources III
MXPBX14.38N/A
N/A
Empower International Index Instl
AMAHX12.39N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Dividend A
RGBLX42.17-0.25
-0.59%
American Funds Global Balanced R-1

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-1.79%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
-3.81%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
-3.70%
UPST - AFRM
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.91%
NET - AFRM
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
More