PTL
Price
$272.92Alerts
Change
+$4.89 (+1.82%)
Updated
Nov 11, 04:51 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
825.5M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VOO
Price
$698.44Alerts
Change
+$8.94 (+1.30%)
Updated
Nov 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.03T
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PTL vs VOO

PTL vs VOO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 24, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) vs. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)

Key Takeaways

  • PTL and VOO are both passively managed, market-cap-weighted US large-cap equity ETFs, but they track different universes: PTL follows the Inspire 500 Index, which applies a biblically responsible investing (BRI) screen, while VOO tracks the benchmark S&P 500 Index.
  • VOO is one of the largest and cheapest funds in the world (0.03% expense ratio), whereas PTL is a newer, smaller fund launched in 2024 (0.09% expense ratio).
  • PTL excludes the "Magnificent Seven" mega-cap technology names, producing a materially lower technology weighting and a heavier tilt toward industrials and energy relative to VOO.
  • VOO is far more concentrated in the technology sector (roughly 39%) and in its largest single holdings, which amplifies sensitivity to mega-cap earnings and sentiment.
  • The funds are not direct competitors; they serve different goals — broad benchmark exposure versus values-aligned large-cap exposure with a distinct sector profile.

Introduction

Investors comparing large-cap US equity ETFs frequently weigh pure benchmark exposure against funds shaped by values-based or thematic constraints. That is exactly the choice presented by the Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) and the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Both are low-cost, index-tracking vehicles covering America's largest companies, yet their construction rules drive very different portfolios. VOO offers the market's full large-cap breadth, while PTL filters that universe through a proprietary biblical values screen that notably excludes the market's dominant mega-cap technology leaders. This ETF comparison clarifies the structural trade-offs, sector exposure, and relative positioning of each fund.

Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) Overview

The Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) seeks to replicate the Inspire 500 Index, a market-cap-weighted index of the 500 largest US companies that receive an Inspire Impact Score of zero or higher — a proprietary measure of alignment with biblical values and positive stakeholder impact. Launched in March 2024, the fund holds roughly 470–500 securities and charges a net expense ratio of 0.09%. It is a passively managed, rules-based product that is reconstituted on an annual schedule.

Because the screen removes the "Magnificent Seven" mega-cap stocks, PTL's largest holdings differ sharply from the broader market. Its top positions include AVGO (Broadcom), XOM (ExxonMobil), PLTR (Palantir Technologies), CAT (Caterpillar), and HD (Home Depot). Sector allocation is more balanced than a cap-weighted benchmark: technology accounts for roughly 28–31%, industrials about 19–20%, energy near 10%, and financial services around 8%, with smaller weights in consumer cyclical, real estate, healthcare, and basic materials. Communication services is minimal. The fund's Assets Under Management (AUM) are around $890 million, and average daily trading volume is comparatively modest, making it a smaller and less liquid product than VOO.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) Overview

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) tracks the S&P 500 Index, a committee-selected, market-cap-weighted benchmark of approximately 500 of the largest publicly traded US companies. Launched in 2010, it is one of the largest ETFs in the world, with AUM in excess of $1 trillion, extremely deep liquidity, and a net expense ratio of just 0.03%.

VOO's top holdings are dominated by mega-cap technology and communication names: NVDA (Nvidia), AAPL (Apple), MSFT (Microsoft), AMZN (Amazon), GOOGL (Alphabet), AVGO (Broadcom), and META (Meta Platforms). Technology is the dominant sector at roughly 38–39%, followed by financial services (about 12%), communication services (around 9.5%), consumer cyclical (about 9%), and healthcare (about 9%). The top ten holdings account for a large share of assets, concentrating the fund's risk in a handful of mega-cap companies. The fund is passively managed and rebalanced to reflect index changes.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate within the US large-cap equity universe, so their fortunes are tied to the same macroeconomic forces: the trajectory of Federal Reserve policy, inflation, corporate earnings, and the artificial intelligence (AI) investment cycle. In recent market cycles, performance has been disproportionately driven by mega-cap technology and semiconductor names benefiting from AI-related capital expenditure. That concentration has been a tailwind for VOO, whose largest holdings sit at the center of the AI trade.

PTL, by contrast, excludes many of those mega-cap names and instead tilts toward industrials, energy, and other sectors more sensitive to the domestic economic cycle, infrastructure spending, and commodity trends. Sector rotation — from growth toward value, energy, and industrials — therefore affects the two funds differently. Regulatory and values-based screening considerations also distinguish PTL, making it less exposed to mega-cap concentration risk but more exposed to cyclical and energy price dynamics.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent weeks and months, VOO has generally benefited from the strength and momentum of mega-cap technology leadership, while PTL's returns have been shaped more by the relative performance of industrials, energy, and financials. When AI-driven growth stocks rally, VOO tends to outperform because those names carry outsized index weight. When investors rotate into value, energy, or domestic cyclicals, PTL's balanced sector mix can narrow the gap or lead.

In terms of relative positioning, VOO offers greater single-stock concentration and higher technology sensitivity, while PTL offers a more diversified sector spread and lower mega-cap concentration, at the cost of a modestly higher fee and less liquidity. Volatility differences are modest, with both funds tracking large-cap equities closely, but the driver of that volatility differs: mega-cap technology sentiment for VOO, and cyclical-sector momentum for PTL.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities far more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to sharpen your own sector and fund research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron's AI would likely favor VOO for investors prioritizing cost efficiency, liquidity, diversification across the full large-cap market, and exposure to the persistent momentum of AI-driven mega-cap leadership. Its 0.03% expense ratio and deep trading volume provide clear structural advantages. That said, PTL may hold appeal in environments favoring value, energy, and industrials, or for investors seeking values-aligned exposure with reduced mega-cap concentration. The AI verdict is probabilistic rather than absolute: VOO currently scores higher on cost and trend consistency, while PTL offers a differentiated risk and sector profile. Neither fund is inherently superior; the choice depends on the investor's goals and risk preferences.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PTL vs. VOO commentary
Nov 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTL is a Buy and VOO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for PTL with price predictions
Nov 10, 2026

PTL's RSI Oscillator ascending out of oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for PTL moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 11 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 10 of the 11 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 30 of 31 cases where PTL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Following a +3.88% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PTL advanced for three days, in 168 of 187 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

PTL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PTL as a result. In 34 of 44 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PTL turned negative on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 27 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 21 of the 27 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 78%.

PTL moved below its 50-day moving average on October 07, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PTL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.

The Aroon Indicator for PTL entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for VOO with price predictions
Nov 10, 2026

VOO in upward trend: price expected to rise as it breaks its lower Bollinger Band on November 05, 2026

VOO may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 34 of 37 cases where VOO's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 41 of 47 cases where VOO's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.

Following a +2.66% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VOO advanced for three days, in 296 of 361 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 29, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on VOO as a result. In 64 of 77 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for VOO turned negative on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 33 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 66%.

VOO moved below its 50-day moving average on November 05, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for VOO crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VOO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.

The Aroon Indicator for VOO entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PTLVOO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

PTL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTL has been closely correlated with EMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PTL jumps, then EMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTL
1D Price
Change %
PTL100%
+0.13%
EMR - PTL
75%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
WCC - PTL
74%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
LFUS - PTL
73%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
TEL - PTL
72%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
ONTO - PTL
71%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSCV41.560.09
+0.22%
Opus Small Cap Value ETF (OSCV)
HEFA46.96-0.04
-0.09%
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA)
XFLX22.56-0.05
-0.21%
FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX)
XCNY31.64-0.10
-0.32%
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY)
GHYG43.45-0.18
-0.42%
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG)