QSR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| QSR | UIVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 58% | 11 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 86% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QSR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while .
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QSR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
QSR (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.62% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.59%.
QSR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ABND | 41.70 | 0.07 | +0.16% |
| American Century Core Plus Income ETF (ABND) | |||
| VIG | 233.53 | 0.22 | +0.09% |
| Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) | |||
| FHDG | 37.22 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF (FHDG) | |||
| MPLY | 32.83 | -0.09 | -0.29% |
| Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF (MPLY) | |||
| QEFA | 96.63 | -0.90 | -0.92% |
| State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSR has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSR jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QSR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QSR | 100% | -1.86% | ||
| FRSH - QSR | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| DIN - QSR | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| DRI - QSR | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| DPZ - QSR | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| SBUX - QSR | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UIVM has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UIVM jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UIVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UIVM | 100% | -1.32% | ||
| TEL - UIVM | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.16% | ||
| NTR - UIVM | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| BP - UIVM | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| QSR - UIVM | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| HLN - UIVM | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||