QTUM
Price
$150.97
Change
-$1.96 (-1.28%)
Updated
Aug 5, 04:19 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$577.26
Change
+$1.55 (+0.27%)
Updated
Aug 5, 04:22 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
67.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTUM vs SMH

QTUM vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) targets quantum computing and machine learning companies with an equal-weighted approach, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) focuses on semiconductor producers and equipment makers with a market-cap weighted structure and individual holding caps.
  • In recent market activity, SMH has delivered stronger year-to-date returns compared to QTUM, driven by broad semiconductor demand tied to artificial intelligence infrastructure.
  • QTUM offers exposure to emerging quantum technologies and AI-adjacent machine learning firms, providing diversification beyond traditional chipmakers.
  • SMH benefits from established leaders in the semiconductor supply chain, including exposure to memory, logic, and fabrication equipment segments.
  • Both exchange-traded funds (ETFs) exhibit higher volatility than broad market indexes, with SMH showing greater beta due to concentrated sector exposure.
  • Market sentiment for both has been influenced by ongoing artificial intelligence capital spending trends in recent weeks.

Introduction

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) represent distinct thematic approaches within the technology sector, appealing to investors seeking targeted exposure to innovation-driven themes. QTUM emphasizes quantum computing and machine learning, while SMH concentrates on the semiconductor ecosystem. This comparison is relevant for traders and investors evaluating sector-specific opportunities, relative momentum, and portfolio diversification strategies in the current market environment characterized by artificial intelligence advancements and supply chain developments.

QTUM Overview and Recent Performance

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, providing exposure to companies involved in quantum computing, machine learning, and related technologies. The fund maintains an equal-weighted portfolio of approximately 70-90 holdings with an expense ratio of 0.40%. In recent weeks, QTUM has shown resilience amid broader technology sector fluctuations, supported by investor interest in quantum advancements and artificial intelligence applications. Performance in recent market activity reflects gains from holdings in quantum and machine learning firms, though the fund has trailed broader semiconductor peers on a year-to-date basis according to data from Yahoo Finance.

SMH Overview and Recent Performance

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) seeks to replicate the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, focusing on U.S. exchange-listed companies engaged in semiconductor production, design, and equipment manufacturing. The fund employs a market-capitalization weighted methodology with a 10% cap per holding and carries an expense ratio of 0.35%. In recent market activity, SMH has posted notable year-to-date gains driven by sustained demand for chips used in artificial intelligence and data center infrastructure. Recent weeks have seen volatility influenced by earnings reports and supply chain updates, with inflows reported into the fund as investor interest in the semiconductor sector remained elevated.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across various strategies, yet only the strongest performers with suitable risk profiles and alignment to current trends earn placement in this section. Available bots feature a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with historical win rates and returns varying by strategy—some demonstrating double-digit annualized returns in backtests while others prioritize lower drawdowns. This diversity allows traders to explore automated approaches tailored to individual objectives. Review the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and live performance data.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) differ in business model and sector exposure: QTUM provides equal-weighted access to quantum and machine learning innovators, offering potential upside from emerging technologies but with higher concentration risk in nascent areas. SMH delivers diversified exposure to established semiconductor leaders and equipment providers, benefiting from mature supply chains and consistent capital expenditure cycles. Recent momentum has favored SMH due to immediate artificial intelligence demand, while QTUM offers complementary positioning in next-generation computing paradigms. Risk factors include QTUM’s sensitivity to technology adoption timelines and SMH’s exposure to cyclical semiconductor downturns and geopolitical supply constraints. Market sentiment remains positive for both amid artificial intelligence tailwinds, though SMH’s larger assets under management reflect broader institutional adoption.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, sector stability, and recent relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) due to stronger documented momentum in semiconductor demand and more established growth catalysts. Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) presents attractive long-term thematic potential but shows comparatively lower recent consistency in the analyzed period. This assessment relies on historical data patterns and does not constitute investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QTUM vs. SMH commentary
Aug 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Buy and SMH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 67.7B vs. QTUM (5.39B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: SMH (59.862) vs QTUM (39.981). QTUM was incepted earlier than SMH: QTUM (8 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
QTUMSMHQTUM / SMH
Gain YTD39.98159.86267%
Net Assets5.39B67.7B8%
Total Expense Ratio0.400.35114%
Turnover42.0012.00350%
Yield0.830.20407%
Fund Existence8 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTUMSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARKQ124.836.21
+5.24%
ARK Autonomous Technology&Robotics ETF
MFMO23.630.82
+3.58%
Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF
CPZ13.530.16
+1.20%
Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Trust
LQTI18.840.15
+0.80%
FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
JANP35.180.02
+0.06%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jan

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
+4.76%
LRCX - QTUM
81%
Closely correlated
+7.85%
MKSI - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
+3.48%
AMAT - QTUM
76%
Closely correlated
+5.48%
ASML - QTUM
76%
Closely correlated
+4.22%
KLAC - QTUM
75%
Closely correlated
+6.95%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
+5.55%
LRCX - SMH
88%
Closely correlated
+7.85%
KLAC - SMH
85%
Closely correlated
+6.95%
AMAT - SMH
85%
Closely correlated
+5.48%
ASML - SMH
84%
Closely correlated
+4.22%
MU - SMH
81%
Closely correlated
+7.62%
More