QTUM
Price
$148.78
Change
+$1.83 (+1.25%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.63B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$555.64
Change
+$8.84 (+1.62%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
66.84B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTUM vs SMH

QTUM vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) provides diversified exposure to quantum computing and machine learning technologies through a modified equal-weighted portfolio of approximately 80 holdings, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) offers concentrated exposure to the semiconductor sector with only 26 holdings.
  • SMH maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.35% compared to QTUM’s 0.40%, potentially enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors seeking semiconductor-focused returns.
  • Both ETFs employ passive indexing strategies but target distinct segments within the broader technology theme: QTUM emphasizes emerging quantum and machine learning applications, whereas SMH focuses on established semiconductor manufacturers and equipment providers.
  • QTUM exhibits greater geographic and company diversification with top holdings typically under 3% each, reducing single-stock concentration risk relative to SMH, where the top holding often exceeds 20%.
  • Sector allocations for both funds are heavily weighted toward information technology, though QTUM incorporates modest allocations to industrials and communication services, while SMH remains nearly exclusively in semiconductors.
  • In the current environment of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption, SMH’s direct link to chip production positions it for semiconductor demand cycles, while QTUM captures longer-term innovation in quantum and advanced computing paradigms.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing themes often evaluate specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that capture different facets of technological innovation. Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) represent complementary yet distinct approaches within the technology sector. They do not compete directly but offer alternative strategies for accessing high-growth areas: QTUM targets quantum computing and machine learning applications, while SMH concentrates on the semiconductor industry that underpins much of today’s AI infrastructure. This comparison helps investors understand structural differences, exposure profiles, and positioning amid ongoing technological advancement and capital allocation toward AI-related capabilities.

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. The fund employs a passive management approach and holds a modified equal-weighted portfolio of companies deriving at least 50% of revenue or operating activity from quantum computing and machine learning technologies. It typically maintains around 80 holdings, promoting diversification across smaller positions. Top holdings often include names such as ARQQ, Horizon Quantum Holdings, MU, AMD, and INTC, with individual weights generally below 3%. Sector allocation is dominated by information technology (approximately 80%), with secondary exposure to industrials and communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.40%. As a thematic, rules-based ETF, QTUM rebalances periodically according to index methodology and appeals to investors interested in next-generation computing beyond conventional semiconductors.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, providing targeted exposure to companies involved in semiconductor production and equipment. The fund uses a passive indexing approach and holds a concentrated portfolio of 26 securities. Top holdings frequently feature NVDA (often exceeding 20%), TSM, AVGO, AMD, and MU, with the top 10 positions accounting for roughly 70% of assets. The fund is almost entirely allocated to information technology, specifically semiconductors. Its expense ratio is 0.35%. SMH’s structure emphasizes leading global semiconductor firms, resulting in higher concentration but direct participation in the supply chain for AI accelerators, memory, and fabrication equipment. Rebalancing follows the index rules, and the ETF offers high liquidity typical of large, established sector products.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor and quantum computing sectors operate within a dynamic environment driven by accelerating AI adoption, data center expansion, and demand for advanced processing capabilities. Capital flows have favored companies enabling AI infrastructure, supported by macroeconomic factors such as corporate technology spending and innovation cycles. Regulatory developments around export controls and supply chain resilience continue to influence global semiconductor manufacturers. Risks include cyclical demand fluctuations, geopolitical tensions affecting key production regions, and rapid technological shifts that could favor or challenge specific sub-sectors. Both ETFs benefit from sustained investment in computing advancements, though SMH aligns more closely with near-term chip demand while QTUM positions for longer-horizon quantum and machine learning breakthroughs.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, semiconductor-focused strategies represented by SMH have demonstrated pronounced sensitivity to AI-related earnings momentum and capacity expansions among leading chipmakers. QTUM’s broader quantum and machine learning mandate has provided exposure to a wider array of technology innovators, resulting in different volatility characteristics and participation in emerging application areas. Relative positioning highlights SMH’s tighter linkage to established semiconductor leaders and their role in current AI hardware demand, contrasted with QTUM’s emphasis on diversification across quantum-adjacent firms. Both have benefited from sector rotation toward technology amid favorable interest rate expectations and digital transformation trends, though concentration differences influence how each responds to shifts in earnings cycles or macroeconomic conditions.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing specialized ETFs like QTUM and SMH may find the tool useful for exploring additional ideas aligned with their thematic objectives.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including cost efficiency, concentrated exposure to high-momentum semiconductor leaders, and alignment with prevailing AI infrastructure demand, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a higher probability of favorable relative positioning to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) in the current environment. Its lower expense ratio and direct participation in the semiconductor supply chain supporting AI workloads represent durable characteristics that could support outperformance versus broader thematic alternatives during periods of sustained technology investment. This assessment remains probabilistic and does not constitute investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QTUM vs. SMH commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 66.8B vs. QTUM (5.63B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: SMH (51.834) vs QTUM (34.490). QTUM was incepted earlier than SMH: QTUM (8 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
QTUMSMHQTUM / SMH
Gain YTD34.49051.83467%
Net Assets5.63B66.8B8%
Total Expense Ratio0.400.35114%
Turnover42.0012.00350%
Yield0.830.20407%
Fund Existence8 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTUMSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLST24.900.02
+0.08%
Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF
GSIE48.11-0.04
-0.08%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF
GMOD28.07-0.03
-0.11%
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
PTF98.16-4.20
-4.10%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology MomtETF
ONDU4.56-0.58
-11.28%
Tradr 2X Long ONDS Daily ETF

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
-2.35%
LRCX - QTUM
81%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
MKSI - QTUM
79%
Closely correlated
-3.60%
LSCC - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
AMAT - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
KLAC - QTUM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
-2.43%
LRCX - SMH
89%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
AMAT - SMH
86%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
KLAC - SMH
86%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
ASML - SMH
84%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
MU - SMH
81%
Closely correlated
-5.83%
More