Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QTUM vs SMH
QTUM vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts QTUM vs SMH
QTUM vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QTUM vs. SMH commentary
Jul 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 72B vs. QTUM (5.65B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: SMH (69.669) vs QTUM (41.372). QTUM was incepted earlier than SMH: QTUM (8 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| QTUM | SMH | QTUM / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 41.372 | 69.669 | 59% |
| Net Assets | 5.65B | 72B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 12.00 | 350% |
| Yield | 0.71 | 0.17 | 424% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QTUM | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 78% | 23 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VOX | 194.72 | 3.70 | +1.94% |
| Vanguard Communication Services ETF | |||
| HWSM | 30.03 | N/A | N/A |
| Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Divers Val Fd | |||
| DVXK | 37.27 | N/A | N/A |
| WEBs Technology XLK Defined Vol ETF | |||
| GGUS | 67.22 | -0.03 | -0.05% |
| Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpGrEqETF | |||
| BUZZ | 35.32 | -0.22 | -0.62% |
| VanEck Social Sentiment ETF | |||
QTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - QTUM | 79% Closely correlated | -3.08% | ||
| MKSI - QTUM | 75% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| KLAC - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| AMAT - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| ASML - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.23% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -3.08% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| MPWR - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | -1.73% | ||
More | ||||