QTUM
Price
$159.87
Change
-$3.47 (-2.12%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
6.34B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$619.19
Change
-$2.86 (-0.46%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
78.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTUM vs SMH

QTUM vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • QTUM offers thematic exposure to quantum computing and machine learning via 86 holdings in a modified equal-weight structure, providing broader diversification across technology (83%), industrials (10%), and communication services (6%).
  • SMH delivers concentrated pure-play semiconductor access through 25 market-cap weighted holdings, 100% in technology, emphasizing leaders like NVDA (18%) and TSM (11%).
  • SMH's expense ratio of 0.35% edges out QTUM's 0.40%, supporting cost efficiency in a high-growth sector.
  • Holdings overlap around 23-31% by weight, including shared names like INTC, MU, and AMD, but QTUM includes non-pure-play firms.
  • SMH suits investors seeking established chip momentum; QTUM targets emerging disruptive tech with higher diversification but potentially elevated volatility.
  • Both benefit from AI tailwinds, though SMH's liquidity and scale enhance its positioning in sector rotations.

Introduction

Investors navigating the AI and advanced computing boom often compare QTUM and SMH, two ETFs offering distinct pathways to semiconductor and computing innovation. While SMH provides direct exposure to the core semiconductor industry powering AI hardware, QTUM targets the frontier of quantum computing and machine learning applications. These funds do not compete head-on but serve as complementary strategies for tech enthusiasts: SMH for proven chip leaders amid current AI demand, and QTUM for diversified bets on next-generation paradigms. In today's environment of surging data center investments and computational advancements, understanding their structural differences aids portfolio positioning for sector exposure and relative performance.

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

The Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is a passive, thematic ETF tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. This modified equal-weighted benchmark selects global companies deriving significant revenue from quantum hardware, machine learning software, or related big data technologies. QTUM holds approximately 86 positions, promoting diversification beyond mega-caps.

Top holdings include INTC (2.96%), MU (2.82%), Global Unichip Corp. (2.45%), MediaTek Inc. (2.36%), and STM (2.13%), with the top 10 comprising about 21% of assets. Sector allocations tilt heavily toward technology (83%), followed by industrials (10%) and communication services (6%), reflecting its multi-faceted theme. The expense ratio is 0.40%, and the index rebalances semi-annually to capture evolving innovators while maintaining liquidity standards. QTUM's structure appeals to those seeking balanced exposure to disruptive computing beyond traditional chips.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passive ETF replicating the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, focusing on the 25 most liquid U.S.-listed companies involved in semiconductor production and equipment. Its market-cap weighted approach favors industry giants, delivering targeted sub-sector exposure.

Top holdings feature NVDA (18.09%), TSM (10.59%), AVGO (7.83%), INTC (approx. 7-8%), and AMD, with the top 10 accounting for over 70% of the fund. Allocation is 100% technology, emphasizing design, fabrication, and equipment. The expense ratio stands at 0.35%, lower than peers, with quarterly rebalancing to reflect market cap and trading volume shifts. SMH's concentrated, liquid profile positions it as a benchmark for semiconductor purity.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor sector, underpinning AI infrastructure, faces robust demand from data centers, edge computing, and hyperscaler expansions. Catalysts include AI chip proliferation, with inference workloads shifting post-training phases, and memory price surges amid supply constraints. Capital flows favor leaders in GPUs and foundries, bolstered by U.S. CHIPS Act subsidies and global supply chain realignments. Quantum computing emerges as a longer-horizon driver, with photonic chips and error-corrected systems advancing commercialization, though scalability risks persist. Macro factors like interest rate stability and geopolitical tensions over Taiwan influence volatility, while sector risks encompass cyclical downturns and overcapacity. Both ETFs thrive in this AI-quantum nexus, with semiconductors providing near-term momentum.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SMH has demonstrated superior relative positioning, driven by explosive gains in AI accelerators from top holdings like NVDA and foundry expansions at TSM. Its concentrated structure amplifies sector rotations toward semiconductors amid earnings beats and capex surges. QTUM, with broader diversification, exhibits steadier but lower volatility, benefiting from machine learning software and quantum enablers like INTC amid big data trends. Holdings overlap (23-31%) links their paths, yet SMH's liquidity and mega-cap tilt yield stronger momentum in AI-fueled upswings, while QTUM offers resilience in thematic shifts away from pure chips. Both navigate interest rate expectations and supply chain dynamics, with SMH showing higher beta to tech rallies.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like ETFs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SMH due to its superior cost efficiency (0.35% expense ratio), concentrated exposure to high-momentum semiconductor leaders, greater liquidity, and stronger trend consistency in recent AI-driven cycles. While QTUM's diversification and quantum thematic strength offer probabilistic upside in emerging tech, SMH's structural alignment with sector capital flows and lower risk-adjusted volatility profile positions it ahead for near-term relative outperformance, absent major quantum breakthroughs.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QTUM vs. SMH commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 78.4B vs. QTUM (6.34B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: SMH (72.729) vs QTUM (49.253). QTUM was incepted earlier than SMH: QTUM (8 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
QTUMSMHQTUM / SMH
Gain YTD49.25372.72968%
Net Assets6.34B78.4B8%
Total Expense Ratio0.400.35114%
Turnover42.0012.00350%
Yield0.730.18398%
Fund Existence8 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTUMSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AURU11.71N/A
N/A
Tradr 2X Long AUR Daily ETF
FMB51.35-0.04
-0.08%
First Trust Managed Municipal ETF
FUND9.55-0.06
-0.62%
Sprott Focus Trust
NJUN32.28-0.55
-1.68%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Jun
PEXL72.91-2.22
-2.96%
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
-3.12%
LRCX - QTUM
79%
Closely correlated
-9.33%
AMAT - QTUM
74%
Closely correlated
-8.48%
TSM - QTUM
74%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
MKSI - QTUM
74%
Closely correlated
-7.46%
KLAC - QTUM
73%
Closely correlated
-9.17%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
-7.01%
LRCX - SMH
86%
Closely correlated
-9.33%
KLAC - SMH
83%
Closely correlated
-9.17%
AMAT - SMH
83%
Closely correlated
-8.48%
TSM - SMH
81%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
ASML - SMH
80%
Closely correlated
-7.82%
More