RJF
Price
$168.66
Change
+$0.71 (+0.42%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.64B
61 days until earnings call
TMXXF
Price
$39.55
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
11.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RJF vs TMXXF

Header iconRJF vs TMXXF Comparison
Open Charts RJF vs TMXXFBanner chart's image
Raymond James Financial
Price$168.66
Change+$0.71 (+0.42%)
Volume$3.33K
Capitalization33.64B
TMX Group
Price$39.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$811
Capitalization11.07B
RJF vs TMXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RJF vs. TMXXF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RJF is a Buy and TMXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RJF: $167.95 vs. TMXXF: $39.55)
Brand notoriety: RJF and TMXXF are both not notable
RJF represents the Investment Managers, while TMXXF is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RJF: 57% vs. TMXXF: 46%
Market capitalization -- RJF: $33.64B vs. TMXXF: $11.07B
RJF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $33.64B. TMXXF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $11.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.06B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $167.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.62B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RJF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTMXXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TMXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the long-term than TMXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMXXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMXXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMXXF is a better buy in the short-term than RJF.

Price Growth

RJF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.37% price change this week, while TMXXF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.04%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

RJF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.75% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RJF($33.6B) has a higher market cap than TMXXF($11.1B). TMXXF has higher P/E ratio than RJF: TMXXF (36.51) vs RJF (16.54). TMXXF YTD gains are higher at: 28.128 vs. RJF (9.222). RJF has more cash in the bank: 2.61B vs. TMXXF (466M). TMXXF has less debt than RJF: TMXXF (2.09B) vs RJF (2.89B). RJF has higher revenues than TMXXF: RJF (13.6B) vs TMXXF (1.59B).
RJFTMXXFRJF / TMXXF
Capitalization33.6B11.1B303%
EBITDAN/A2.22B-
Gain YTD9.22228.12833%
P/E Ratio16.5436.5145%
Revenue13.6B1.59B856%
Total Cash2.61B466M561%
Total Debt2.89B2.09B138%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RJF vs TMXXF: Fundamental Ratings
RJF
TMXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7456
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
146
SMR RATING
1..100
1072
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2625
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RJF's Valuation (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TMXXF (34) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to TMXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TMXXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as RJF (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that TMXXF’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMXXF (72) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMXXF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as TMXXF (55) in the null industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to TMXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TMXXF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as RJF (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that TMXXF’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RJFTMXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLLL28.010.59
+2.17%
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
BITO20.260.16
+0.80%
ProShares Bitcoin ETF
SPYT18.370.03
+0.16%
Defiance S&P 500 Target Income ETF
MUA10.57-0.02
-0.19%
Blackrock Muni Assets Fund
RAYJ33.22-0.24
-0.72%
Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF

TMXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMXXF and PIPR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMXXF and PIPR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMXXF
1D Price
Change %
TMXXF100%
-0.02%
PIPR - TMXXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
JPXGY - TMXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
RJF - TMXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
HOOD - TMXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.40%
EVR - TMXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More