SCHV vs VTV

Key Takeaways

• SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index with roughly 570 holdings, while VTV tracks the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index with about 320 holdings, giving SCHV a broader, more diversified portfolio.
• Both funds are passively managed, low-cost large-cap value strategies; VTV carries a marginally lower expense ratio of 0.03% versus SCHV's 0.04%.
• Financials, technology, healthcare, and industrials dominate both portfolios, but VTV skews slightly more toward healthcare and carries a larger average market capitalization.
• VTV is far larger by assets under management (AUM), roughly $180 billion versus about $15 billion for SCHV, offering deeper liquidity and scale.
• Neither fund is a pure defensive value play; both hold notable semiconductor exposure through names such as Micron Technology.
• The choice between them largely comes down to cost, breadth, and preferred concentration rather than any dramatic difference in sector thesis.

Introduction

In an environment marked by shifting interest-rate expectations, sector rotation, and renewed scrutiny of high-flying growth names, large-cap value ETFs have moved back into focus. SCHV and VTV are two of the most widely followed vehicles in this category, and they compete directly for the same investor goal: broad, inexpensive exposure to established U.S. companies trading at comparatively attractive valuations. Although their underlying indexes differ, the two funds hold substantial overlap and similar sector tilts. This ETF comparison examines their structural differences, sector exposure, cost profiles, and relative positioning to help investors understand where the two strategies converge and where they diverge.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) Overview

The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Launched in December 2009, it holds approximately 570 stocks spanning the large-cap value segment of the U.S. equity market. With an expense ratio of 0.04%, it ranks among the cheapest funds in the large-cap value category and manages roughly $15 billion in assets.

Its largest positions include Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, Exxon Mobil, Johnson & Johnson, Walmart, and AbbVie. Financials represent the largest sector weighting at roughly 20% of the portfolio, followed by technology, healthcare, and industrials. SCHV also retains meaningful energy and consumer staples exposure. The fund rebalances in line with its index and uses a market-capitalization-weighted, value-oriented selection methodology, resulting in a broadly diversified, large-cap tilt.

Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) Overview

The Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index. Launched in January 2004, it is one of the oldest and largest value ETFs in the market, with roughly $180 billion in assets and an expense ratio of just 0.03%. The fund holds about 320 stocks, a more concentrated portfolio than SCHV's, and skews toward the very largest U.S. value names.

Its top holdings overlap heavily with SCHV, including Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, Exxon Mobil, Johnson & Johnson, and Walmart, with Micron Technology ranking as the single largest position. Financials lead the sector allocation at roughly 21–23%, followed by healthcare, industrials, and technology. VTV's healthcare weighting is notably higher than SCHV's, while its technology allocation is somewhat lower. This concentration in large, financially stable companies gives VTV a slightly higher weighted average market cap and a marginally lower overall portfolio beta.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds sit at the intersection of several dominant market themes. Expectations around Federal Reserve interest-rate policy, inflation, and economic growth continue to influence the relative appeal of value versus growth. Financial stocks, the largest weight in both ETFs, are sensitive to the shape of the yield curve and credit conditions, while energy and industrials respond to commodity prices, capital-expenditure cycles, and global trade dynamics. Healthcare remains a steady defensive anchor, and the presence of semiconductor names such as Micron Technology links both funds to the artificial-intelligence and memory-chip demand cycle. As investors have rotated toward more reasonably valued, cash-generating businesses, capital flows into large-cap value strategies have strengthened. The principal sector risks include cyclical downturns in financials, energy price volatility, and concentrated exposure to a handful of dominant mega-cap names.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent weeks and recent market cycles, both SCHV and VTV have generally moved in tandem, reflecting their substantial overlap and shared value orientation. Relative positioning, however, has been shaped by subtle differences in sector exposure. VTV's larger healthcare and financials allocation has provided somewhat different risk characteristics than SCHV's broader, more diversified basket, which includes a slightly higher number of mid-sized holdings. During periods when semiconductor and technology value names outperformed, SCHV's wider tech footprint offered incremental participation; conversely, VTV's tilt toward healthcare and its heavier concentration in mega-cap names tended to moderate volatility. Overall, VTV's scale and lower fee give it a marginal structural cost advantage, while SCHV's greater breadth offers slightly broader diversification. Neither fund has shown a persistent, decisive edge, as their performance drivers remain closely aligned.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. To explore value-oriented funds and sector leaders in today's market, open the AI Screener and apply your own criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor VTV for most cost- and scale-sensitive investors. Its 0.03% expense ratio, enormous liquidity, and long track record provide a marginal structural edge, while its heavier allocation to healthcare and mega-cap value leaders offers a slightly more defensive profile amid ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty. That said, SCHV remains an exceptionally strong alternative, distinguished by broader diversification across roughly 570 holdings and a slightly wider technology footprint that may capture more upside during semiconductor-led rallies. The distinction is narrow: VTV leads on cost efficiency, liquidity, and concentration in established leaders, while SCHV leads on breadth. Investors prioritizing minimal cost and scale may lean toward VTV; those seeking greater diversification may prefer SCHV.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations