SEIC
Price
$69.02
Change
-$4.47 (-6.08%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
11 days until earnings call
STT
Price
$76.25
Change
-$6.58 (-7.94%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
23.35B
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SEIC vs STT

Header iconSEIC vs STT Comparison
Open Charts SEIC vs STTBanner chart's image
SEI Investments
Price$69.02
Change-$4.47 (-6.08%)
Volume$920.37K
Capitalization9.3B
State Street
Price$76.25
Change-$6.58 (-7.94%)
Volume$3.15M
Capitalization23.35B
SEIC vs STT Comparison Chart
Loading...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SEIC vs. STT commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEIC is a Buy and STT is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SEIC: $69.02 vs. STT: $76.25)
Brand notoriety: SEIC and STT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SEIC: 123% vs. STT: 154%
Market capitalization -- SEIC: $9.3B vs. STT: $23.35B
SEIC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $9.3B. STT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $23.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SEIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SEIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the long-term than SEIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SEIC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SEIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the short-term than STT.

Price Growth

SEIC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -10.49% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was -13.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

STT is expected to report earnings on Jul 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-5.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STT($23.3B) has a higher market cap than SEIC($9.3B). SEIC has higher P/E ratio than STT: SEIC (20.47) vs STT (13.84). SEIC YTD gains are higher at: -16.319 vs. STT (-21.036). STT has more cash in the bank: 4.05B vs. SEIC (866M). SEIC has less debt than STT: SEIC (25.4M) vs STT (21.5B). STT has higher revenues than SEIC: STT (11.9B) vs SEIC (1.92B).
SEICSTTSEIC / STT
Capitalization9.3B23.3B40%
EBITDA669MN/A-
Gain YTD-16.319-21.03678%
P/E Ratio20.4713.84148%
Revenue1.92B11.9B16%
Total Cash866M4.05B21%
Total Debt25.4M21.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SEIC vs STT: Fundamental Ratings
SEIC
STT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
536
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2640
SMR RATING
1..100
376
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6677
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STT's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (85) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as STT (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

STT's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SEIC (37) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SEIC (73) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as STT (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SEICSTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSRT37.69-1.14
-2.92%
Hartford AAA CLO ETF
FDV25.88-1.37
-5.03%
Federated Hermes US Strategic Dvd ETF
BLCV29.60-1.76
-5.62%
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
FQAL58.41-3.55
-5.73%
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
FNDX21.35-1.30
-5.74%
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large CompanyETF

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
-6.08%
BN - SEIC
73%
Closely correlated
-8.16%
TROW - SEIC
72%
Closely correlated
-4.20%
AMG - SEIC
69%
Closely correlated
-5.87%
BAM - SEIC
69%
Closely correlated
-6.01%
STT - SEIC
69%
Closely correlated
-7.94%
More

STT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STT
1D Price
Change %
STT100%
-7.94%
NTRS - STT
78%
Closely correlated
-5.05%
PFG - STT
72%
Closely correlated
-8.04%
BN - STT
71%
Closely correlated
-8.16%
BK - STT
71%
Closely correlated
-8.26%
BLK - STT
70%
Closely correlated
-7.33%
More