Advertisement
SF vs SIEB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SF is a Buy and SIEB is a Hold.
SF's RSI Indicator ascending out of oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for SF moved out of oversold territory on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 27 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 22 of the 27 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 81%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on SF as a result. In 57 of 85 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SF just turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where SF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
SF moved above its 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 50-day moving average for SF moved below the 200-day moving average on October 15, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
SF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for SF entered a downward trend on November 02, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. SF’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 83 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.022) is normal, around the industry mean (3.120). P/E Ratio (12.039) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.734). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.833) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (8.976) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.116) is also within normal values, averaging (16.899).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
SIEB in downward trend: 10-day moving average crossed below 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026
The 10-day moving average for SIEB crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
SIEB moved below its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SIEB declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
The Aroon Indicator for SIEB entered a downward trend on November 05, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where SIEB's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 26 of 32 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 11, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on SIEB as a result. In 78 of 97 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SIEB just turned positive on November 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where SIEB's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
The 50-day moving average for SIEB moved above the 200-day moving average on October 12, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +7.65% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SIEB advanced for three days, in 207 of 263 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
SIEB may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 6 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.825) is normal, around the industry mean (3.120). SIEB's P/E Ratio (-59.333) is considerably lower than the industry average of (6.734). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.520) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.449) settles around the average of (8.976) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.949) is also within normal values, averaging (16.899).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. SIEB’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. SIEB’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock worse than average.
SF | SIEB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SIEB's Valuation (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SF (83). This means that SIEB’s stock grew significantly faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.
SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SIEB (100). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SIEB’s over the last 12 months.
SF's SMR Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SIEB (91). This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than SIEB’s over the last 12 months.
SF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SIEB (62). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to SIEB’s over the last 12 months.
SF's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SIEB (100). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to SIEB’s over the last 12 months.
| SF | SIEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 83% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SIEB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SIEB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIEB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SIEB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +6.53% price change this week, while SIEB (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -7.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -23.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
SF is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2027.
SIEB is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.40% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
Advertisement
SF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
SIEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIEB has been loosely correlated with MEGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SIEB jumps, then MEGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIEB | 100% | +3.87% | ||
| MEGL - SIEB | 45% Loosely correlated | +12.33% | ||
| TOP - SIEB | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| SF - SIEB | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| ARBK - SIEB | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SRL - SIEB | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INTL | 29.60 | 0.29 | +1.01% |
| Main International ETF (INTL) | |||
| SCHF | 27.17 | 0.22 | +0.82% |
| Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) | |||
| QLVE | 31.72 | N/A | N/A |
| Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF (QLVE) | |||
| IBDZ | 24.97 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Corporate ETF (IBDZ) | |||
| CNBS | 23.48 | -0.08 | -0.35% |
| Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) | |||