NDAQ
Price
$95.23
Change
+$0.54 (+0.57%)
Updated
Aug 7, 02:01 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.86B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SF
Price
$83.14
Change
-$0.25 (-0.30%)
Updated
Aug 7, 02:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.78B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NDAQ vs SF

NDAQ vs SF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) vs. Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • NDAQ has transformed into a diversified technology platform, with annual net revenues exceeding $5.2 billion in 2025 and strong momentum across Financial Technology, Index, and Market Services divisions.
  • SF delivered its best second quarter in history in 2025, driven by record client assets of $516.5 billion and its strongest financial advisor recruiting quarter in a decade.
  • Both stocks have experienced year-to-date price declines through mid-2026 — NDAQ down approximately 5% and SF down approximately 6.7% — though one-year returns remain positive for both.
  • NDAQ benefits from recurring SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) revenue streams and secular growth in anti-financial-crime technology, while SF offers exposure to wealth management and investment banking cycles.
  • Valuation metrics diverge meaningfully: NDAQ trades at a higher price-to-sales multiple, reflecting its tech-platform premium, while SF trades at a lower multiple more typical of diversified financial services firms.
  • The comparison illustrates a choice between an exchange-and-technology franchise with recurring revenue and a full-service wealth management and institutional brokerage with strong capital-return discipline.

Introduction

Investors comparing financial sector stocks often face a nuanced decision: allocate capital to an established exchange and technology infrastructure provider, or to a diversified wealth management and investment banking firm. NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.) and SF (Stifel Financial Corp.) represent two fundamentally different approaches to value creation within the financial services ecosystem. Nasdaq has evolved far beyond its exchange roots into a global financial technology powerhouse, while Stifel remains centered on personalized wealth management, institutional brokerage, and advisory services. This stock comparison examines how these two companies have performed amid the current market environment, what has been driving sentiment, and how their business models contrast — offering insights relevant for both growth-oriented and value-conscious market participants.

NDAQ Overview and Recent Performance

Nasdaq, Inc. operates as a leading global technology company serving corporate clients, investment managers, banks, brokers, and exchange operators. Over recent years, the firm has undergone a significant strategic transformation, diversifying well beyond its historic identity as a stock exchange into a broad-based provider of data, analytics, software, and financial technology solutions. The company's platform now spans Financial Technology — including anti-financial-crime solutions via Nasdaq Verafin — Capital Access Platforms such as Listings and Index, and Market Services encompassing U.S. and European equities and derivatives trading.

In recent market activity, NDAQ shares have shown notable resilience. As of mid-July 2026, the stock stood near $91.64, having gained approximately 10% over the preceding month. On a one-year basis, the stock has delivered a positive return of roughly 3%, though year-to-date performance has been slightly negative at around -5%. The company reported full-year 2025 net revenues of $5.2 billion — the first time it crossed the $5 billion threshold — representing 13% growth year-over-year. Solutions revenue surpassed $4 billion, and Annualized Recurring Revenue (ARR) reached $3.1 billion by year-end, with SaaS revenue representing 38% of ARR. The Index franchise set new records with year-end assets under management (AUM) of $882 billion and $99 billion in net inflows. Nasdaq also maintained its position as the top U.S. listing exchange by proceeds raised for the seventh consecutive year, welcoming the largest exchange transfer in history when Walmart moved its listing to Nasdaq.

Sentiment has been further supported by Nasdaq's progress in deleveraging — achieving its gross leverage milestone well ahead of schedule — and by innovation initiatives including a filing with the SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) to facilitate trading of tokenized securities and plans to introduce 23/5 trading in the second half of 2026. The company's growing recurring revenue base, now at roughly $3 billion in ARR, provides a degree of earnings visibility that markets tend to reward.

SF Overview and Recent Performance

Stifel Financial Corp. is a diversified financial services holding company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, operating through its wholly owned subsidiaries across wealth management, institutional brokerage, investment banking, and retail and commercial banking. The firm serves individual investors, professional money managers, corporations, and municipalities through a broad platform that includes Stifel, Nicolaus & Company; Keefe, Bruyette & Woods; and Stifel Bank. Its business model centers on an advice-driven approach, with wealth management representing the largest and most stable revenue contributor.

In recent weeks, SF shares have traded near $77, gaining about 5% over the past month but declining roughly 5.8% over the trailing three-month period. The stock's one-year return stands at approximately 7.4%, though year-to-date performance through mid-July 2026 has been negative at around -6.7%. Stifel reported its best second quarter in company history for the period ended June 2025, generating over $1.28 billion in net revenue — the third-best quarter on record — with non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $1.71, exceeding analyst expectations. Record client assets reached $516.5 billion, up 9% year-over-year, and fee-based client assets grew 15% to $206.3 billion.

A standout development in recent months has been Stifel's success in advisor recruitment: the firm added 82 financial advisors during the second quarter of 2025, including 36 experienced advisors from the B. Riley acquisition, marking its strongest recruiting quarter in a decade. The firm's non-GAAP pre-tax margin held at 20.3%, and annualized return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) — a key profitability measure for financial firms — reached 21.7%. Capital management has also been a positive signal: Stifel increased its quarterly dividend by 9.5% to $0.46 per share and repurchased $83 million in shares during the quarter, while maintaining robust capital ratios including a Tier 1 common capital ratio of 14.5%. Operating data through July 2025 showed total client assets climbing further to $522.3 billion, with treasury deposits surging 87% year-over-year.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking an algorithmic edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate dynamic market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market environments earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles — from short-term swing trading and momentum strategies to longer-term trend-following and sector-rotation approaches — each with distinct risk profiles, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker coverage. Some bots featured on the platform have delivered annualized returns exceeding 20%, with varying degrees of drawdown and win rates depending on strategy aggressiveness. Whether monitoring NDAQ, SF, or thousands of other equities, these AI systems continuously analyze technical indicators, fundamental data, and market patterns to identify opportunity. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to discover which strategies and tickers are currently capturing algorithmic attention.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both NDAQ and SF operate within the broad financial services sector, their business models, growth drivers, and risk profiles differ considerably. Nasdaq generates the majority of its revenue from technology and data solutions — including SaaS-based anti-financial-crime software, market technology, and index licensing — supplemented by transaction-based Market Services revenue. This tilt toward recurring revenue, with ARR now exceeding $3 billion and growing at roughly 10% annually, positions Nasdaq closer to a financial technology company than a traditional exchange. Stifel, by contrast, derives its revenue primarily from wealth management fees, institutional trading commissions, investment banking advisory and underwriting fees, and net interest income from its banking operations. Its earnings are more sensitive to equity market levels, interest rates, and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity cycles.

On valuation, the two stocks reflect these structural differences. NDAQ trades at a price-to-sales ratio of approximately 5.9, a premium that reflects its higher-margin, recurring-revenue technology orientation and perceived earnings stability. SF, with a price-to-sales ratio near 2.1, trades at a valuation more typical of diversified financial services firms — lower multiples but with sensitivity to capital markets cycles. In terms of recent momentum, both stocks have faced headwinds year-to-date, though NDAQ has shown stronger one-month relative performance, gaining roughly 10% versus SF's approximately 5% over the same recent period. Risk factors also diverge: Nasdaq faces execution risk around its technology integration and platform unification strategy, while Stifel's outlook is tied to advisor retention, deal-making activity, and the interest rate environment — all cyclical variables. Sector exposure offers another contrast: Nasdaq provides broad, index-like exposure to the technology and innovation economy through its listings and index franchises, while Stifel offers concentrated exposure to the health of U.S. middle-market wealth creation and corporate activity.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, stability of revenue streams, and relative positioning in the current market environment, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely express a moderate preference for NDAQ over SF at this juncture. The reasoning centers on several probabilistic factors: Nasdaq's higher proportion of recurring SaaS and ARR-based revenue provides greater earnings visibility compared to Stifel's more cyclical, transaction-dependent income streams. Nasdaq's double-digit organic revenue growth across all three divisions, combined with its successful deleveraging and growing index franchise with record AUM and inflows, suggests durable business momentum that algorithmic models tend to identify as favorable. Additionally, Nasdaq's expanding role in anti-financial-crime technology and regulatory software — areas with secular demand tailwinds — offers growth optionality less correlated with capital markets sentiment. Stifel's strong advisor recruitment and record client assets are genuine positives, but its business model remains comparatively more exposed to market-volume sensitivity and investment banking cycles. This assessment is probabilistic in nature, reflecting current observable data and trend signals rather than any definitive prediction of future price action.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NDAQ vs. SF commentary
Aug 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDAQ is a Buy and SF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2026
Stock price -- (NDAQ: $94.70 vs. SF: $83.39)
Brand notoriety: NDAQ and SF are both not notable
NDAQ represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while SF is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NDAQ: 48% vs. SF: 55%
Market capitalization -- NDAQ: $52.86B vs. SF: $12.78B
NDAQ [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $52.86B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $120.88B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $38.73B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NDAQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than NDAQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NDAQ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.15%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+2.99% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.65% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NDAQ($52.9B) has a higher market cap than SF($12.8B). NDAQ has higher P/E ratio than SF: NDAQ (27.61) vs SF (14.91). SF YTD gains are higher at: 0.687 vs. NDAQ (-1.842). SF has less debt than NDAQ: SF (1.52B) vs NDAQ (9.24B). NDAQ has higher revenues than SF: NDAQ (8.74B) vs SF (5.69B).
NDAQSFNDAQ / SF
Capitalization52.9B12.8B413%
EBITDA3.43BN/A-
Gain YTD-1.8420.687-268%
P/E Ratio27.6114.91185%
Revenue8.74B5.69B154%
Total Cash2.79BN/A-
Total Debt9.24B1.52B607%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NDAQ vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
NDAQ
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8445
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2947
SMR RATING
1..100
5422
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7984
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NDAQ's Valuation (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (68). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (47). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (22) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (54). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (46). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (84). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NDAQSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NDAQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RELY25.931.86
+7.73%
Remitly Global
SLB51.541.63
+3.27%
SLB Limited
OMDA19.540.43
+2.25%
Omada Health Inc
SIGA3.12-0.03
-0.95%
SIGA Technologies
PMEC0.43-0.02
-3.78%
Primech Holdings Ltd

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+0.15%
JEF - NDAQ
71%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
MS - NDAQ
71%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
GS - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
-2.62%
RJF - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
SPGI - NDAQ
68%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-1.09%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
PIPR - SF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.34%
EVR - SF
69%
Closely correlated
-2.65%
NDAQ - SF
69%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
MC - SF
67%
Closely correlated
-3.11%
More