Advertisement
NDAQ vs SF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDAQ is a Hold and SF is a Hold.
NDAQ's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NDAQ turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where NDAQ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where NDAQ's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 14 of 23 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NDAQ as a result. In 50 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
Following a +2.08% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NDAQ advanced for three days, in 226 of 357 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
NDAQ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
NDAQ moved below its 50-day moving average on September 24, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for NDAQ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 47%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NDAQ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 50%.
The Aroon Indicator for NDAQ entered a downward trend on September 25, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 79, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NDAQ’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 82 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.318) is normal, around the industry mean (-5.093). P/E Ratio (27.003) is within average values for comparable stocks, (25.252). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.712) is also within normal values, averaging (1.780). Dividend Yield (0.013) settles around the average of (0.018) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.831) is also within normal values, averaging (7.166).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
SF in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on September 10, 2026
SF moved below its 50-day moving average on September 10, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 26 of 37 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day moving average for SF crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 14, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The Aroon Indicator for SF entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 40 of 59 cases where SF's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on SF as a result. In 56 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SF just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where SF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 37 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Following a +0.90% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SF advanced for three days, in 243 of 364 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
SF may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 15 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.996) is normal, around the industry mean (4.320). P/E Ratio (12.588) is within average values for comparable stocks, (30.932). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.833) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (0.016) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.116) is also within normal values, averaging (16.763).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 86, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. SF’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
NDAQ | SF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SF's Valuation (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NDAQ (82). This means that SF’s stock grew significantly faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (57). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.
SF's SMR Rating (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (52). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (71). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (87). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.
| NDAQ | SF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 6 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 50% | 1 day ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NDAQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NDAQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +1.31% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.14%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -6.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.94% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-6.42% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SEA | 21.90 | 0.27 | +1.25% |
| U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) | |||
| ONEV | 143.28 | 0.61 | +0.43% |
| State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) | |||
| GSSC | 86.04 | -0.22 | -0.26% |
| TR Activebeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) | |||
| ASCI | 36.98 | -0.18 | -0.48% |
| Abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI) | |||
| JASMY.X | 0.004904 | -0.000199 | -3.90% |
| JasmyCoin cryptocurrency | |||
NDAQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SF - NDAQ | 66% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||
SF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.