Advertisement
SIG vs TPR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Signet Jewelers (SIG) vs. Tapestry (TPR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- TPR has delivered stronger year-to-date returns of about 12% compared to SIG's 3.81%, reflecting robust momentum in luxury accessories.
- Over the past year, TPR surged approximately 105%, outpacing SIG's 44% gain, driven by sales growth and market positioning.
- SIG trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 12.1 versus TPR's 55.3, suggesting relative value in jewelry retail amid cyclical pressures.
- Analyst price targets indicate potential upside: 29% for SIG to $110.78 and 13% for TPR to $162.05 from recent levels.
- Both stocks face consumer cyclical risks, but TPR's larger market cap of $29B provides greater scale than SIG's $3.5B.
- Recent monthly performance shows modest gains for both, with SIG up around 1.5% and TPR flat to slightly positive amid market volatility.
Introduction
SIG and TPR operate in the luxury consumer goods sector, with SIG focusing on jewelry retail and TPR on fashion accessories. This comparison highlights their relative performance, valuation, and market dynamics in recent market activity. Traders seeking exposure to discretionary spending trends and investors evaluating consumer cyclical plays will find insights into growth trajectories, sentiment shifts, and head-to-head metrics valuable for informed decision-making.
SIG Overview and Recent Performance
Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) is the world's largest retailer of diamond jewelry, operating brands like Kay Jewelers, Zales, and Jared. In recent market activity, SIG shares have traded around $85-86, within a 52-week range of $59.90 to $110.20. Year-to-date gains stand at 3.81%, lagging broader indices, while one-year returns reached 44% amid fluctuating consumer demand for big-ticket items. Sentiment has been influenced by steady revenue of $6.81 billion (trailing twelve months, or TTM) and profitability with a 4.32% profit margin, supported by analyst upgrades like UBS raising its target to $126. Recent weeks showed volatility, with modest monthly gains of about 1.5%, reflecting resilience in core brand sales despite economic pressures on discretionary purchases.
TPR Overview and Recent Performance
Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) designs and markets luxury accessories through brands including Coach, Kate Spade, and Stuart Weitzman. Shares recently hovered near $142-143, in a 52-week band from $71.99 to $161.97. The stock posted solid year-to-date returns of 12.02% and an impressive 105% over the past year, fueled by strong quarterly earnings beats, such as Q2 EPS of $2.69 exceeding estimates. TTM revenue hit $7.51 billion with a 6.95% profit margin, bolstered by $1.08 billion in cash reserves. Recent performance has been stable, with monthly changes near flat amid analyst optimism, including Citigroup lifting its target to $170, though weekly dips reflect broader sector rotation.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 351 available, selected for their suitability in current market conditions like volatility in tech, industrials, and small caps. These bots showcase diverse strategies, with annualized returns reaching up to +163% (e.g., on tickers like USAR, SMR), win rates from 51% to 88%, and trade counts ranging from 4 to 12 across timeframes like 15-minute to daily intervals. They trade thousands of tickers in sectors such as semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, ASML), space, and ETFs, adapting to trends with risk management. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your trading edge in dynamic environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
SIG specializes in jewelry retail with a concentrated model, while TPR offers diversified luxury bags and accessories, providing broader brand exposure. Growth drivers differ: TPR benefits from international reach and recent earnings momentum, contrasting SIG's focus on U.S. same-store sales recovery. Recent momentum favors TPR with superior one-year gains, though SIG holds a valuation edge via lower P/E. Risk factors include sensitivity to consumer spending for both, with TPR's higher beta (1.47 vs. 1.20) signaling greater volatility. Sector exposure aligns in luxury goods, but market sentiment leans toward TPR's scale and catalysts like potential M&A (mergers and acquisitions).
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward TPR with higher probability due to consistent trend strength, superior relative performance over multiple timeframes, and positive analyst momentum. Factors like robust YTD gains and earnings catalysts position it favorably against SIG's value-oriented stability, though both warrant monitoring in cyclical markets.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SIG is a Hold and TPR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SIG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTPR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- SIG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TPR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SIG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SIG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TPR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
SIG (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -12.96% price change this week, while TPR (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was -3.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
SIG is expected to report earnings on Jun 02, 2026.
TPR is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (-3.41% weekly)The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.
| SIG | TPR | SIG / TPR | |
| Capitalization | 3.01B | 26.1B | 12% |
| EBITDA | 663M | 1.12B | 59% |
| Gain YTD | -7.636 | 1.484 | -514% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.73 | 39.43 | 27% |
| Revenue | 6.81B | 7.85B | 87% |
| Total Cash | 875M | 1.07B | 82% |
| Total Debt | 1.22B | 3.92B | 31% |
SIG | TPR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 24 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SIG's Valuation (23) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TPR (49) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that SIG’s stock grew similarly to TPR’s over the last 12 months.
TPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SIG (75) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SIG’s over the last 12 months.
TPR's SMR Rating (18) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SIG (55) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SIG’s over the last 12 months.
TPR's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as SIG (63) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew similarly to SIG’s over the last 12 months.
TPR's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for SIG (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew significantly faster than SIG’s over the last 12 months.
| SIG | TPR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
SIG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIG has been loosely correlated with CPRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SIG jumps, then CPRI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIG | 100% | -3.26% | ||
| CPRI - SIG | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| MOV - SIG | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| TPR - SIG | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| REAL - SIG | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| ELA - SIG | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
More | ||||
TPR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPR has been loosely correlated with CPRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TPR jumps, then CPRI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TPR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPR | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| CPRI - TPR | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| SIG - TPR | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| MOV - TPR | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| LVMHF - TPR | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| LVMUY - TPR | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
More | ||||