Advertisement
SRFM vs VLRS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRFM is a StrongBuy and VLRS is a Hold.
VLRS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SRFM | VLRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SRFM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while VLRS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SRFM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VLRS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SRFM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLRS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SRFM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- VLRS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SRFM (@Airlines) experienced а +22.56% price change this week, while VLRS (@Airlines) price change was -4.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was -2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
SRFM is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
VLRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Airlines (-2.69% weekly)Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
Advertisement
SRFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SRFM and ALGT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRFM and ALGT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SRFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRFM | 100% | -5.83% | ||
| ALGT - SRFM | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AAL - SRFM | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
| ALK - SRFM | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
| CPA - SRFM | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| VLRS - SRFM | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
More | ||||
VLRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLRS has been loosely correlated with LTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VLRS jumps, then LTM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VLRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLRS | 100% | -2.14% | ||
| LTM - VLRS | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.31% | ||
| UAL - VLRS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| ALGT - VLRS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| ALK - VLRS | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| RYAAY - VLRS | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
More | ||||