SUMXF
Price
$2.87
Change
-$0.07 (-2.38%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
125.03M
SW
Price
$43.32
Change
+$0.25 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
10.32B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SUMXF vs SW

Header iconSUMXF vs SW Comparison
Open Charts SUMXF vs SWBanner chart's image
Supremex
Price$2.87
Change-$0.07 (-2.38%)
Volume$700
Capitalization125.03M
Smurfit WestRock
Price$43.32
Change+$0.25 (+0.58%)
Volume$1.56M
Capitalization10.32B
SUMXF vs SW Comparison Chart
Loading...
SW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUMXF vs. SW commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUMXF is a Hold and SW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SUMXF: $2.87 vs. SW: $43.32)
Brand notoriety: SUMXF and SW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUMXF: 27% vs. SW: 44%
Market capitalization -- SUMXF: $125.03M vs. SW: $10.32B
SUMXF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $125.03M. SW’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $10.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUMXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SUMXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUMXF is a better buy in the long-term than SW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

SUMXF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а +1.77% price change this week, while SW (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

SW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+1.43% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SW($10.3B) has a higher market cap than SUMXF($125M). SW has higher P/E ratio than SUMXF: SW (10.20) vs SUMXF (5.19). SUMXF YTD gains are higher at: 11.576 vs. SW (-18.174). SW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.99B vs. SUMXF (61.4M). SW has more cash in the bank: 482M vs. SUMXF (2.12M). SUMXF has less debt than SW: SUMXF (117M) vs SW (3.8B). SW has higher revenues than SUMXF: SW (11.8B) vs SUMXF (298M).
SUMXFSWSUMXF / SW
Capitalization125M10.3B1%
EBITDA61.4M1.99B3%
Gain YTD11.576-18.174-64%
P/E Ratio5.1910.2051%
Revenue298M11.8B3%
Total Cash2.12M482M0%
Total Debt117M3.8B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUMXF vs SW: Fundamental Ratings
SUMXF
SW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3078
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6267
SMR RATING
1..100
9186
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
153
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUMXF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SW (33). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew similarly to SW’s over the last 12 months.

SUMXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SW (67). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew similarly to SW’s over the last 12 months.

SW's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMXF (91). This means that SW’s stock grew similarly to SUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

SUMXF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SW (59). This means that SUMXF’s stock grew similarly to SW’s over the last 12 months.

SW's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMXF (15). This means that SW’s stock grew similarly to SUMXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRL144.703.50
+2.48%
Charles River Laboratories International
KLIC33.170.27
+0.82%
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
MDV14.07-0.01
-0.07%
Modiv Industrial
FLWS5.01-0.02
-0.40%
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
ATNF1.04-0.01
-0.95%
180 Life Sciences Corp

SUMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUMXF and WIPKF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUMXF and WIPKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUMXF
1D Price
Change %
SUMXF100%
-2.47%
WIPKF - SUMXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - SUMXF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
TCLAF - SUMXF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
MNHFF - SUMXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VKSC - SUMXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SW has been closely correlated with IP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SW jumps, then IP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SW
1D Price
Change %
SW100%
+0.58%
IP - SW
68%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
PKG - SW
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
SEE - SW
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
GEF - SW
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.37%
SLGN - SW
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
More