TILE($1.97B) has a higher market cap than XMAX($553M). XMAX has higher P/E ratio than TILE: XMAX (17.14) vs TILE (13.81). XMAX YTD gains are higher at: 42.500 vs. TILE (22.613). TILE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 230M vs. XMAX (-4.45M). TILE has more cash in the bank: 81.5M vs. XMAX (34.6M). XMAX has less debt than TILE: XMAX (5.61M) vs TILE (279M). TILE has higher revenues than XMAX: TILE (1.44B) vs XMAX (16M).

	TILE	XMAX	TILE / XMAX
Capitalization	1.97B	553M	357%
EBITDA	230M	-4.45M	-5,164%
Gain YTD	22.613	42.500	53%
P/E Ratio	13.81	17.14	81%
Revenue	1.44B	16M	9,006%
Total Cash	81.5M	34.6M	236%
Total Debt	279M	5.61M	4,977%

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

TILE vs XMAX: Fundamental Ratings

	TILE	XMAX
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100	67	55
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100	77 Overvalued	74 Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100	21	32
SMR RATING 1..100	42	20
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100	49	41
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100	68	100
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100	50	50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XMAX's Valuation (74) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as TILE (77) in the Building Products industry. This means that XMAX’s stock grew similarly to TILE’s over the last 12 months.

TILE's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as XMAX (32) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that TILE’s stock grew similarly to XMAX’s over the last 12 months.

XMAX's SMR Rating (20) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as TILE (42) in the Building Products industry. This means that XMAX’s stock grew similarly to TILE’s over the last 12 months.

XMAX's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as TILE (49) in the Building Products industry. This means that XMAX’s stock grew similarly to TILE’s over the last 12 months.

TILE's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as XMAX (100) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that TILE’s stock grew similarly to XMAX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Technical Analysis

	TILE	XMAX
RSI ODDS (%)	2 days ago 77%	2 days ago 74%
Stochastic ODDS (%)	2 days ago 79%	2 days ago 90%
Momentum ODDS (%)	2 days ago 62%	2 days ago 83%
MACD ODDS (%)	2 days ago 60%	2 days ago 90%
TrendWeek ODDS (%)	2 days ago 66%	2 days ago 85%
TrendMonth ODDS (%)	2 days ago 68%	2 days ago 89%
Advances ODDS (%)	26 days ago 75%	2 days ago 85%
Declines ODDS (%)	3 days ago 66%	4 days ago 85%
BollingerBands ODDS (%)	2 days ago 76%	2 days ago 76%
Aroon ODDS (%)	2 days ago 68%	2 days ago 90%

COMPARISON

Comparison

Sep 12, 2026

Stock price -- (TILE: $34.13 vs. XMAX: $8.55)

Brand notoriety: TILE and XMAX are both not notable

Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TILE: 64% vs. XMAX: 81%

Market capitalization -- TILE: $1.97B vs. XMAX: $552.97M

TILE [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $1.97B. XMAX’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $552.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $6.58K to $27.62B. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $2.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TILE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while XMAX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

TILE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
XMAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

According to our system of comparison, both TILE and XMAX are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TILE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XMAX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

TILE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
XMAX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

According to our system of comparison, TILE is a better buy in the short-term than XMAX.

Price Growth

TILE (@Home Furnishings) experienced а -8.35% price change this week, while XMAX (@Home Furnishings) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +266.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

TILE is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (-3.54% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

View a ticker or compare two or three

TILE

Daily Signal:

Gain/Loss:

XMAX

Setup

Daily Signal:

Description

Gain/Loss:

Trend Trader for RUSSELL 2000: Magic Formula & Optimal Structure, 60min, (FA)Trend Trader for RUSSELL 2000: Magic Formula & Optimal Structure, 60min, (FA)

VIEW DETAILS VIEW DETAILS

VIEW FOR FREE VIEW FOR FREE

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

ETFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
BUZZ	37.25	0.47	+1.28%
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
SRVR	30.31	0.28	+0.94%
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Rl EsttETF
PDCC	8.96	0.01	+0.11%
Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.
CGSM	26.06	0.02	+0.08%
Capital Group Short Dur Muncpl Inc ETF
ACSV	48.56	N/A	N/A
American Century Small Cp Val Insgts ETF

TILE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TILE has been closely correlated with MHK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TILE jumps, then MHK could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To TILE	1D Price Change %
TILE	100%	+0.83%
MHK - TILE	68% Closely correlated	+2.05%
SGI - TILE	52% Loosely correlated	+0.98%
MBC - TILE	48% Loosely correlated	N/A
ETD - TILE	47% Loosely correlated	+0.37%
LEG - TILE	45% Loosely correlated	N/A
More

XMAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XMAX and MWYN have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XMAX and MWYN's prices will move in lockstep.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To XMAX	1D Price Change %
XMAX	100%	+0.12%
MWYN - XMAX	12% Poorly correlated	+0.09%
KEQU - XMAX	11% Poorly correlated	+4.73%
VIRC - XMAX	9% Poorly correlated	+0.81%
BSET - XMAX	8% Poorly correlated	-2.27%
TILE - XMAX	7% Poorly correlated	+0.83%
More