UNH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| TMED | UNH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 65% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TMED and LLY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMED and LLY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMED | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMED | 100% | +1.13% | ||
| LLY - TMED | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| UNH - TMED | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| ALNY - TMED | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.02% | ||
| DHR - TMED | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| GILD - TMED | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNH has been closely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UNH jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.